Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

California · Nonprofit

Global GLOW

Global GLOW (California) receives grants from 20 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,109,426 to it, the largest being HODGE AND SCHUYLER FAMILY FOUNDATION ($1,200,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$3.0M
Revenue FY2024
20
Funders on record
$2.1M
Grants received
$861k
Net assets
9/20 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 11%

Against its field

Global GLOW has grown faster than half of the 1,925 youth development nonprofits its size.

Months of reserve2.4mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)18% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,925 youth development nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($1.3M) Expenses 100 ($2.8M) Net assets 100 ($331k)2020 Revenue 208 ($2.8M) Expenses 91 ($2.6M) Net assets 163 ($540k)2021 Revenue 281 ($3.8M) Expenses 125 ($3.5M) Net assets 230 ($763k)2022 Revenue 248 ($3.3M) Expenses 139 ($3.9M) Net assets 42 ($141k)2023 Revenue 395 ($5.3M) Expenses 155 ($4.4M) Net assets 316 ($1.0M)2024 Revenue 225 ($3.0M) Expenses 114 ($3.2M) Net assets 260 ($861k)
201920202021202220232024
Revenue (225)Expenses (114)Net assets (260)Peer revenue range
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 8 funders to 6 funders, grant income rose $43k → $602k.

5 of 20 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)39% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Global GLOW’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Global GLOW leans on a few funders — its largest provides 57% of grant income and the top three 90%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

39% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Global GLOW.

57%
largest funder
90%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 28% · 2018 33% · 2019 77% · 2020 100% · 2021 83% · 2022 37% · 2023 83%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

15% of Global GLOW's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 45% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

98% of Global GLOW's grant income comes from California funders.

WA
MI
NY
NV
CA
TN

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $813k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 20 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding Global GLOW receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $37 on record.

State$37
Top programs
  • REFUNDS - GENERAL $37

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Global GLOW

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Global GLOW: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Global GLOW?
Global GLOW (California) receives grants from 20 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,109,426 to it, the largest being HODGE AND SCHUYLER FAMILY FOUNDATION ($1,200,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Global GLOW have?
IRS filings report 20 organizations giving $2,109,426 in grants to Global GLOW, 9 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Global GLOW?
HODGE AND SCHUYLER FAMILY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,200,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Global GLOW find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2019–2024), and the filings of 20funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing