Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Washington · Nonprofit

Farms for Life

Farms for Life (Washington) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $271,014 to it, the largest being AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ($74,488). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$61k
Revenue FY2024
12
Funders on record
$271k
Grants received
$89k
Net assets
9/12 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 65%

Against its field

Farms for Life has grown faster than half of the 7,170 philanthropy nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−98% · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)2% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 7,170 philanthropy nonprofits under $100k, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($54k) Expenses 100 ($46k) Net assets 100 ($53k)2018 Revenue 115 ($62k) Expenses 104 ($47k) Net assets 129 ($68k)2019 Revenue 111 ($60k) Expenses 115 ($52k) Net assets 143 ($75k)2020 Revenue 174 ($94k) Expenses 190 ($86k) Net assets 158 ($83k)2021 Revenue 196 ($106k) Expenses 152 ($69k) Net assets 228 ($120k)2022 Revenue 138 ($75k) Expenses 171 ($78k) Net assets 222 ($117k)2023 Revenue 240 ($130k) Expenses 209 ($95k) Net assets 282 ($149k)2024 Revenue 113 ($61k) Expenses 265 ($121k) Net assets 169 ($89k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (113)Expenses (265)Net assets (169)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

98% of Farms for Life’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (95% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 8,526 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$9k
17
$15k
18
$7k
19
$8k
20
$37k
21
$3k
22
$35k
23
$60k
24
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 6 funders, grant income rose $5k → $55k.

3 of 12 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)48% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Farms for Life’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Farms for Life has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 27% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

70% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Farms for Life.

27%
largest funder
66%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 89% · 2018 50% · 2019 100% · 2020 39% · 2021 55% · 2022 36% · 2023 27%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

63% of Farms for Life's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 75% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

53% of Farms for Life's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA
CO
DE
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $131k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 12 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like Farms for Life

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Farms for Life: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Farms for Life?
Farms for Life (Washington) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $271,014 to it, the largest being AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ($74,488). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Farms for Life have?
IRS filings report 12 organizations giving $271,014 in grants to Farms for Life, 9 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Farms for Life?
AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $74,488 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Farms for Life find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 12funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing