· Private foundation
First Republic Foundation
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $593k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHELSEA FACTORY | $250,000 |
| TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY | $221,504 |
| ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC | $150,000 |
| EDEN HOUSING INC | $110,914 |
| THE BOTTOM LINE INC | $110,914 |
| SESAME WORKSHOP | $10,000 |
| SIMA STUDIOS | $7,500 |
| MARINES MEMORIAL FUND | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $627k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $616k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NRNEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION2× · 2021–2022 · $250k · revenue +15%
- TSTen Strands2× · 2021–2022 · $200k · revenue +577%
- JSJUILLIARD SCHOOL2× · 2021–2022 · $200k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEYone grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue -34%
- AFALI FORNEY CENTER INCone grant, 2022 · $755k · revenue +18%
- TPTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $600k · revenue -3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
For more than five decades, public advocates has challenged the systemic causes of poverty and racial discrimination by strengthening community voices in public policy and achieving tangible legal victories advancing education, housing,…
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Epacenter's mission is to increase opportunities for youth to discover and amplify their talents, realize their potential, and impact the world through art, design, and technology.
Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…
Digital nest (nurturing entrepreneurial skills with technology) is dedicated to providing equal access to technology and resources to young people in underserved communities. digital nest seeks to stimulate economic development by…
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…
City year helps students and schools succeed, while preparing the next generation of civically engaged leaders who can work across lines of difference. partnering with teachers, teams of city year americorps members cultivate learning…
The institute for nonprofit practice's mission is to transform communities by equipping the most promising nonprofit leaders with the skills, confidence, and resources they need to make their organizations effective, innovative, and…
Rivet School's mission is to build and scale a new model of higher education that reliably enables traditionally underserved students to earn an affordable bachelor's degree in as little as two years, leading to a great first job and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Grand Teton National Park Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 37% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
114 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 114 of the 138 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CHELSEA FACTORY INC ↗
- Who funds STUDENT FREEDOM INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds ALI FORNEY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE POSSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PREP FOR PREP ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ART STABILIZATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds TIPPING POINT COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds NETWORK FOR TEACHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP ↗
- Who funds Ten Strands ↗
- Who funds JUILLIARD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds EXODUS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds JUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds NON-PROFIT HOUSING ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds CITY LIVING NY INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOTTOM LINE INC ↗
- Who funds EDEN HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds DANCEUSA ↗
- Who funds 10000 DEGREES ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SPHINX ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds A COMMUNITY OF FRIENDS ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds CODMAN SQUARE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN ↗
- Who funds BREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds FIFTH AVENUE COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds LUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER OF BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
- Who funds BUSINESSES UNITED IN INVESTING LENDING & DEVELOPMENT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · McNabb Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Crankstart Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · The Henry Mayo Newhall Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area · California Community Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Asian Pacific Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization First Republic Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Black Parent Initiative — 45% of income from government
- La Alianza Hispana Inc — 41% of income from government
- Clackamas Women's Services — 33% of income from government
- The Carver Inc — 16% of income from government
- Cascade Aids Project — 13% of income from government
- Chica Inc — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Silver Lining Mentoring Inc — 10% of income from government
- Center for Creative Education — 2% of income from government
- Camp Harbor View Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Boston Center for the Arts Inc — 1% of income from government
- Enterprise Community Development Inc — 1% of income from government
- Community Music Center of Boston Inc — 1% of income from government
- North Pole Studio — 0% of income from government
- The Bottom Line Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to First Republic Foundation?
Find your warmest path to First Republic Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.