Skip to content
Financial Health Network Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Financial Health Network Inc

The financial health network is a trusted resource for business leaders, policymakers, and innovators united in a mission to improve the financial health of their customers, employees, and communities.

$25k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Community Improvement$1.1MHuman Services$627kYouth Development$325kCrime & Legal$325kPhilanthropy$272kEducation$165kPublic Safety & Disaster$151kHousing & Shelter$127kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SILVUR SERVICES LLC$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–21, $552k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GREENPATH FINANCIAL WELLNESS: $151k → 8%URBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY: $50k → 16%HEARTLAND HUMAN CARE SERVICES INC: $77k → 14%THE FINANCIAL CLINIC: $50k → 20%IRC'S CENTER FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY: $50k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $125k → 17%HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC: $50k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
IA
NJ
CA
NE
MO
MD
DE
AZ
DC
LA
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$736k · 16 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +90% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
50

Total granted

$736k
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
+1%

Still filing today

25%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyArts & CultureMembership BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION
    2× · 2018–2022 · $167k · revenue +90%
  • EI
    EARN INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $132k · revenue +131%
  • NT
    NEIGHBORHOOD TRUST FINANCIAL PARTNERS INC
    2× · 2018–2020 · $100k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • GI
    GREENPATH INC
    one grant, 2020 · $151k · revenue +5%
  • GIVEDIRECTLY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue -32%
  • M
    MyPathgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $150k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
2
Center for Responsible Lending

Promoting financial fairness and economic opportunity for all, ending abusive lending practices.

Crime & Legal
3
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
4
Enterprise Community Investment Inc

All our efforts support our strategic goals to increase housing supply, advance racial equity and build resilience and upward mobility.the organization raises private capital through investment and by forming effective partnerships.…

Housing & Shelter
5
Ascendus Inc

Ascendus empowers low-to-moderate income business owners through access to capital and financial education.

Community Improvement
6
The Louisville Urban League Inc

As an active partner, leader and catalyst, we will assist african americans, other minority groups and the disadvantaged attain social and economic equality and stability through direct services and advocacy.

Human Services
7
Abilitypath Housing

Abilitypath housing advances affordable, accessible housing projects that promote independence and inclusive communities for adults with developmental disabilities. through partnerships and innovative program designs, abilitypath housing…

Human Services
8
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
9
Finreglab Inc

Finreglab is a d.c.-based research organization working at the intersection of financial innovation and public policy. our mission is to advance technology and data use to help people and small businesses manage their financial lives,…

Science & Tech
10
Exodus Financial Services

Exodus lending works with financially excluded minnesotans to advance economic justice through consumer lending, community organizing, and advocacy.

Human Services
11
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
12
Upturn Inc

Upturn advances equity and justice in the design, governance, and use of technology.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Local Initiatives Support Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Pie for Providers Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
19/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Onward: $178,200 · OtherOnwardMyPath: $150,000 · OtherMyPathEDQUITY INC: $150,000 · OtherEDQUITY INCPIE FOR PROVIDERS LTD: $100,000 · OtherPIE FOR PROVIDERS LTDNEBRASKA EARLY CHILDHOOD COLLABORATIVE: $90,000 · OtherNEBRASKA EARLY CHILDHOOD COLLABORATIVELATIN UNITED COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSN: $76,650 · OtherGreater Birmingham Ministries: $75,000 · OtherRESTORATIVE STRATEGIES LLC: $65,000 · OtherAUBURN UNIVERSITY: $60,000 · OtherWOMEN'S INSTITUTE FOR A SECURE RETIREMENT: $75,000 · Other+37 more: $561,426 · Other+37 moreGREENPATH INC: $150,500 · Human ServicesGREENPATH INCGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTLY INCHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $125,000 · Human ServicesHENRY STREET SETTLEMENTHEARTLAND HUMAN CARE SERVICES INC: $76,650 · Human ServicesHEARTLAND HUMAN CARE SE…Change Machine: $50,000 · Human ServicesChange MachineHEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesHEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIET…URBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY: $50,000 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX C…IRCS CENTER FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesIRCS CENTER FOR ECONOMI…UPSOLVE INC: $125,000 · Crime & LegalUPSOLVE IN…finEQUITY Inc: $100,000 · Crime & LegalfinEQUITY …THE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION: $50,000 · Crime & LegalTHE ANTI-R…JUSTICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER OF LOUISIANA: $50,000 · Crime & LegalJUSTICE AN…EARN INC: $132,000 · PhilanthropyEARN INCTHE FLAGSTONE INITIATIVE INC: $90,000 · PhilanthropyTHE FLAGS…THE DIRECTORS COUNCIL: $50,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DIREC…LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $166,650 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INI…The Workers Lab: $50,000 · Community ImprovementThe Worke…ACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND INC: $50,000 · Community ImprovementACCION OP…RESOURCES LEGACY FUND: $110,000 · EnvironmentNEIGHBORHOOD TRUST FINANCIAL PARTNERS INC: $100,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,581,276Human Services$702,150Crime & Legal$325,000Philanthropy$272,000Community Improvement$266,650Environment$110,000Arts & Culture$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $166,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREENPATH INC: $150,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMyPath: $150,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetEARN INC: $132,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $125,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUPSOLVE INC: $125,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetRESOURCES LEGACY FUND: $110,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetfinEQUITY Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetPIE FOR PROVIDERS LTD: $100,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD TRUST FINANCIAL PARTNERS INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE FLAGSTONE INITIATIVE INC: $90,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetNEBRASKA EARLY CHILDHOOD COLLABORATIVE: $90,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLATIN UNITED COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSN: $76,650 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHEARTLAND HUMAN CARE SERVICES INC: $76,650 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGreater Birmingham Ministries: $75,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetWOMEN'S INSTITUTE FOR A SECURE RETIREMENT: $75,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetUNIDOSUS: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChange Machine: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Workers Lab: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCREDIT BUILDERS ALLIANCE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetJustine Petersen Housing And Reinvestment Corporation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE ANTI-RECIDIVISM COALITION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE URBAN INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJUSTICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER OF LOUISIANA: $50,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetTHE DIRECTORS COUNCIL: $50,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetCOMPASS WORKING CAPITAL INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetIRCS CENTER FOR ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO CONSUMER ACTION: $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetMONEYTHINK: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wells Fargo FoundationThe Prudential Founda…IdeoorgCiti FoundationAnnie E Casey Foundat…Robin Hood FoundationRockefeller Philanthr…Capital One Foundatio…WK Kellogg FoundationTides FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…Fidelity Foundation
Wells Fargo FoundationMN18.2× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wells Fargo Foundation · The Prudential Foundation · Ideoorg · Citi Foundation · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Capital One Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Tides Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Fidelity Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Financial Health Network Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Financial Health Network Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Urban League of Essex County: 20% of income from government
  • Compass Working Capital Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Financial Health Network’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home