Skip to content
Essential Access Health at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Essential Access Health

Essential access advances reproductive equity and champions quality sexual and reproductive health care for everyone, everywhere.

$34M
Granted FY2024still arriving
102
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$2.6M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$162MHuman Services$4.8MCivil Rights$3.6MEducation$1.9MYouth Development$1.2MHousing & Shelter$942kCommunity Improvement$861kCrime & Legal$504kOther$0
02FY2024 · 102 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k67 grants · $9.7M
  • $250k+33 grants · $24M
$171,424
Median grant
4
States reached
$40M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST$2,646,752
PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE$2,426,439
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF LOS ANGELES$2,150,171
PLANNED PARENTHOOD ORANGE & SAN BERNARDINO$1,830,750
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF PASEDENA AND SAN GABRIEL VALLEY$1,602,761
PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTHERN CALIFORNIA$1,295,062
ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE$1,125,000
FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC$722,084
BIRTHWORKERS OF COLOR COLLECTIVE$620,000
COUNTY OF LA DHS HARBOR UCLA MEDICAL CTR DEPT OF OBGYN$600,000
COUNTY OF LA DHS OLIVE VIEW MEDICAL CTR DEPT OF OBGYN$600,000
COUNTY OF LA DHS LAC USC MEDICAL CTR DEPT OF OBGYN$600,000
COUNTY OF LA DHS WOMEN'S HEALTH PROGRAM & INNOVATION$550,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF CALIFORNIA CENTRAL COAST$478,040
FAMILY PLANNING ASSOCIATES MEDICAL GROUP$475,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $5.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SHORES OF HOPE: $52k → 16%MIGHTY COMMUNITY ADVOCACY: $254k → 19%HO'OLA LAHUI HAWAIIKAUAI COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $143k → 9%SHORES OF HOPE: $39k → 16%MIGHTY COMMUNITY ADVOCACY: $54k → 19%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $51k → 10%SHORES OF HOPE: $36k → 16%HO'OLA LAHUI HAWAIIKAUAI COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $107k → 9%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $41k → 10%SHORES OF HOPE: $32k → 16%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $37k → 10%LOCAL INDIANS FOR EDUCATION: $48k → 14%FRESNO COUNTY ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION: $346k → 19%HO'OLA LAHUI HAWAIIKAUAI COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $95k → 9%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $35k → 10%LOCAL INDIANS FOR EDUCATION: $43k → 14%SHORES OF HOPE: $18k → 16%FRESNO COUNTY ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION: $237k → 19%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $20k → 10%LOCAL INDIANS FOR EDUCATION: $39k → 14%LOCAL INDIANS FOR EDUCATION: $29k → 14%FRESNO COUNTY ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION: $214k → 19%LOCAL INDIANS FOR EDUCATION: $15k → 14%FAMILIES TOGETHER OF ORANGE COUNTY: $314k → 10%FRESNO COUNTY ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION: $197k → 19%FAMILIES TOGETHER OF ORANGE COUNTY: $233k → 10%FAMILIES TOGETHER OF ORANGE COUNTY: $127k → 10%FRESNO COUNTY ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION: $176k → 19%FAMILIES TOGETHER OF ORANGE COUNTY: $97k → 10%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $375k → 14%FAMILIES TOGETHER OF ORANGE COUNTY: $30k → 10%FRESNO COUNTY ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION: $163k → 19%FRESNO COUNTY ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION: $138k → 19%HEALTH RIGHT 360: $218k → 10%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $375k → 14%WOMEN'S COMMUNITY CLINIC: $154k → 10%FRESNO COUNTY ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION: $115k → 19%HEALTH RIGHT 360: $101k → 10%WIND YOUTH: $17k → 12%ALL PEOPLES CHRISTIAN CENTER: $52k → 14%ALL PEOPLES CHRISTIAN CENTER: $45k → 14%ALL PEOPLES CHRISTIAN CENTER: $36k → 14%ALL PEOPLES CHRISTIAN CENTER: $28k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $48k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $45k → 14%ALL PEOPLES CHRISTIAN CENTER: $16k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $26k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $18k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$175M · 135 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against +62% for those funded once.

135 repeat relationships: 91 still active in FY2024, 44 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

135
14

Total granted

$175M
$952k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+62%

Still filing today

81%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $985k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST
    6× · 2017–2024 · $10M · revenue +104%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $10M · revenue +37%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $8.0M · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • DC
    DUPONT CLINIC
    one grant, 2023 · $450k
  • CHINATOWN SERVICE CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +62%
  • SC
    STANISLAUS COUNTY LIBRARY
    one grant, 2017 · $95k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
2
Native American Health Center Inc

Native American Health Center provides a continuum of medical, dental and behavioral health care, culturally responsive social and health programs and Women, Infants and Children (WIC) programs as well as other healthcare services,…

—
3
Tiburcio Vasquez Health Center Inc

Provide comprehensive community health services to southern Alameda County.

Health
4
Open Door Community Health Centers

Open Door Community Health Centers promotes social justice and human dignity through exceptional patient-centered care that improves the health and well-being of our patients, community, and staff.

Health
5
All Inclusive Community Health Cent

The organization provides health care and other related services to medically underserved populations in Los Angeles County.

Health
6
Redwoods Rural Health Center Inc

Redwoods Rural Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) that provides primary, preventative healthcare services to all people without regard to social or economic status.

Health
7
Central City Community Health Center Inc

To provide health care services to underserved communities.

Unclassified
8
United Health Centers of the San Joaquin

The organization is committed to the lifetime wellness of the communities by providing accessible, comprehensive quality health care to everyone with compassion and respect, regardless of ability to pay.

Health
9
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
10
Gardner Family Health Network Inc

Gardner Health Services (GHS) is dedicated to providing high quality, comprehensive medical and mental healthcare, including prevention and education, early intervention, treatment and advocacy services which are affordable, respectful,…

Health
11
Long Valley Health Center

Long Valley Health Center is a rural federally qualified health clinic offering primary health, including physical examinations, dental services, acupuncture, well baby checks and immunizations. Long Valley Health Center will work to…

Health
12
Mendocino Community Health Clinic Inc

To provide the highest quality healthcare for everyone in our communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is East Valley Community Health Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sex Workers Outreach Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

130 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 130 of the 158 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
127/130
Grantees still filing
106/130
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST: $10,435,615 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWESTPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $10,381,197 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $7,985,595 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELESPlanned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc: $5,922,358 · HealthPlanned Parenthood Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley Inc: $5,064,553 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOODORANGE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES INC: $4,596,805 · HealthFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC: $4,456,429 · Health+67 more: $71,566,512 · Health+67 moreHARBOR UCLA MEDICAL CENTER GUILD: $4,399,975 · OtherHARBOR UCLA MEDICAL CENTER GUI…ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: $2,575,000 · OtherACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICELOS ANGELES COUNTY REGISTRAR-RECORDERCOUNTY CLERK: $2,498,148 · OtherCOUNTY OF RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH AGENCY: $2,320,841 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHCARE: $2,123,307 · OtherSAN BERNARDINO: $1,760,751 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $1,711,867 · OtherFP ASSOCIATES MEDICAL GROUP: $1,634,571 · OtherASIAN PACIFIC HEALTH CARE VENTURE INC: $1,617,319 · OtherEAST VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $1,594,505 · OtherCommunity Action Partnership of San Luis Obispo County Inc: $1,590,467 · Other+52 more: $23,240,270 · Other+52 moreFresno County Economic Opportunities Commission: $1,584,642 · Human ServicesFAMILIES TOGETHER OF ORANGE COUNTY: $800,573 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $750,000 · Human ServicesCOUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AUX: $506,787 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTER: $472,512 · Human ServicesHO'OLA LAHUI HAWAII: $345,362 · Human ServicesMIGHTY COMMUNITY ADVOCACY: $308,020 · Human Services+7 more: $1,058,291 · Human ServicesST JOHN'S COMMUNITY HEALTH: $1,809,688 · PhilanthropyHANA HEALTH: $190,484 · PhilanthropyUniversity of Chicago: $600,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY FRESNO FOUNDATION: $63,555 · EducationACT for Women and Girls: $52,019 · EducationYOUTH DEVELOPMENT LABS INC: $600,000 · InternationalLos Angeles Metropolitan Churches: $322,326 · Religion
Health$120,409,064Other$47,067,021Human Services$5,826,187Philanthropy$2,000,172Education$715,574International$600,000Religion$322,326

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST: $10,435,615 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC: $10,381,197 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $7,985,595 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc: $5,922,358 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley Inc: $5,064,553 over 7y, 5.8% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOODORANGE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES INC: $4,596,805 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC: $4,456,429 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $3,540,056 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY HEALTHCARE NETWORK: $3,253,492 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD CALIFORNIA CENTRAL COAST: $2,896,699 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetNORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION: $2,830,413 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetCOMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $2,701,445 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: $2,575,000 over 2y, 54% of budgetMARIN COMMUNITY CLINIC: $2,562,946 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetCENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YSIDRO INC: $2,431,988 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetVISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC: $2,309,071 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetWILMINGTON COMMUNITY CLINIC: $2,222,342 over 8y, 6.5% of budgetSANTA ROSA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $2,218,858 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetAltura Centers for Health: $2,175,217 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetPEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH: $2,141,009 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetVIA CARE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $2,128,441 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHCARE: $2,123,307 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTERS INC: $2,065,680 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetWESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $1,875,209 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetLA MAESTRA FAMILY CLINIC INC: $1,839,871 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetST JOHN'S COMMUNITY HEALTH: $1,809,688 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetLA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC: $1,741,802 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCHICO FEMINIST WOMENS HEALTH CENTER dba WOMENS HEALTH SPECIALISTS: $1,706,618 over 7y, 10% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $1,670,977 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetVALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE: $1,651,988 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC HEALTH CARE VENTURE INC: $1,617,319 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetEAST VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $1,594,505 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetCommunity Action Partnership of San Luis Obispo County Inc: $1,590,467 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetFresno County Economic Opportunities Commission: $1,584,642 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CLINIC INC: $1,473,180 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $1,456,712 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetSan Diego Family Care: $1,394,029 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetJWCH INSTITUTE INC: $1,352,778 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetBAY AREA COMMUNITY HEALTH: $1,344,615 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetWATTS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION: $1,236,620 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetSACRAMENTO NATIVE AMERICAN HEALTH CENTER: $1,202,035 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetIMPERIAL BEACH COMMUNITY CLINIC: $1,187,731 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $1,097,416 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetSOUTH BAY FAMILY HEALTHCARE CENTER: $1,037,255 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA NEIGHBORHOOD CLINICS: $1,020,385 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetWAIANAE DISTR COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH &: $995,894 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAXIS COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $974,897 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetVALLEY HEALTH TEAM INC: $968,264 over 7y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE PACIFIC SOUTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo Inc ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood Pasadena and San Gabriel Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOODORANGE AND SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS OF SAN DIEGO INC ↗
  • Who funds HARBOR UCLA MEDICAL CENTER GUILD ↗
  • Who funds ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY HEALTHCARE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD CALIFORNIA CENTRAL COAST ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds MARIN COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YSIDRO INC ↗
  • Who funds VISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds WILMINGTON COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA ROSA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds Altura Centers for Health ↗
  • Who funds PEDIATRIC AND FAMILY MEDICAL CENTER DBA EISNER HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds VIA CARE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LA MAESTRA FAMILY CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN'S COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds LA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICO FEMINIST WOMENS HEALTH CENTER dba WOMENS HEALTH SPECIALISTS ↗
  • Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN PACIFIC HEALTH CARE VENTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Action Partnership of San Luis Obispo County Inc ↗
  • Who funds Fresno County Economic Opportunities Commission ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Physicians…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Direct ReliefCalifornia Healthcare…California Primary Ca…Public Health Institu…Delta Dental Communit…The California Wellne…The California Endowm…East Bay Community Fo…California Community …The Ralph M Parsons F…
California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California FdnCA114.6× affinity59 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Direct Relief · California Healthcare Foundation · California Primary Care Association · Public Health Institute · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · The California Endowment · East Bay Community Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Essential Access Health funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Essential Access Health. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    30report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 158 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Essential Access Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home