· Public charity
Esperanza United
ESPERANZA UNITED's mission is to mobilize latinas and latino communities to end domestic violence.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 32 grants below total $5,888,446 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $6,192,130 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $303,684 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
- $50k–250k23 grants · $3.7M
- $250k+7 grants · $2.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LATINAS UNIDOS POR UN NUEVO AMANECER LUNA | $419,958 |
| CORE EL CENTRO INC | $343,043 |
| MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION | $311,991 |
| CASA FORTALEZA | $282,177 |
| TRINITY HEALING CENTER INC | $279,680 |
| NUEVO SENDERO | $256,676 |
| PATI'S LIBELULAS | $253,170 |
| ALIANZA NACIONAL DE CAMPENSINAS | $233,001 |
| VIOLENCE INTERVENTION PROGRAM INC | $225,413 |
| CASA PROTEGIDA JULIA DE BURGOS INC | $203,474 |
| CONSEJO COUNSELING AND REFERRAL SERVICE | $198,651 |
| OHIO HISPANIC COALITION | $187,740 |
| LATINOS IN VIRINIA EMPOWERMENT CENTER (V) | $178,403 |
| CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA | $178,364 |
| SEPA MUJER INC | $178,168 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $3.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
28 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $225k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MLMUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION3× · 2023–2025 · $660k · revenue +23%
- LULATINAS UNIDAS POR UN NUEVO AMANECER2× · 2024–2025 · $465k · revenue +14% · 29% of their budget
- CFCASA FORTALEZA2× · 2024–2025 · $449k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- OHOHIO HISPANIC COALITIONgraduatedone grant, 2025 · $188k · revenue +62%
- AIASISTA IMMIGRANT ASSISTANCEone grant, 2025 · $22k · revenue 0%
- UNUJIMA NATIONAL CENTER ON VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN IN THE BLACK COMMUNITYone grant, 2025 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…
To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.
We exist to support victims of violence and injustice, such as domestic violence and sexual assault, with confidential victim advocacy and cultural practices for healing and justice.
La Luz Organization helps the underserved Latino population in Oklahoma with culturally and faith based trauma-informed services to victims of domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking.
La Casa de las Madres' mission is to respond to calls for help from DV victims, of all ages, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. We give survivors the tools to transform their lives. We seek to prevent future violence by educating the…
See Schedule O.The mission of Latina SafeHouse Initiative is to provide bilingual and culturally sensitive services to Latina survivors of domestic violence and their families. Latina SafeHouse Initiative builds support and…
VIDA mainly represents immigrant survivors of violent crimes particularly domestic violence sexual assault abuse and trafficking in persons modern-day slavery forced labor.
La Familia Counseling Service is an inclusive Latino community-based, multi-cultural organization committed to strengthening the emotional wellness of individuals and the preservation of families.
Esperanza united's mission is to mobilize latinas and latino communities to end domestic violence.
Centro's mission is to provide culturally competent support services to families in a holistic approach in order to improve their quality of life.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Enlace Comunitario and the most unlike its peers is Chicanos Por La Causa Inc Cplc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MUJERES LATINAS EN ACCION ↗
- Who funds Core El Centro Incorporated ↗
- Who funds LATINAS UNIDAS POR UN NUEVO AMANECER ↗
- Who funds CASA FORTALEZA ↗
- Who funds Alianza Nacional de Campesinas Inc ↗
- Who funds NUEVO SENDERO INC ↗
- Who funds LATINOS IN VIRGINIA EMPOWERMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE TRANSLATIN COALITION ↗
- Who funds Trinity Healing Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Violence Intervention Program ↗
- Who funds CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC ↗
- Who funds MIXTECO INDIGENA COMMUNITY ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗
- Who funds CASA JUANA COLON APOYO Y ORIENTACION A LA MUJER INC ↗
- Who funds VOCES LATINAS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Consejo Counseling & Referral Service ↗
- Who funds ENLACE COMUNITARIO ↗
- Who funds Hispanos Unidos De Buffalo ↗
- Who funds CASALUZ ↗
- Who funds MUJERES UNIDAS EN JUSTICIA EDUCACION Y REFFORMA INC ↗
- Who funds LA CASA INC ↗
- Who funds MONARCH SERVICES-SERVICIOS MONARCA ↗
- Who funds SEPA MUJER INC ↗
- Who funds TALLER SALUD INC ↗
- Who funds CASA PROTEGIDA JULIA DE BURGOS INC ↗
- Who funds PROYECTO MATRIA INC ↗
- Who funds THE LATINA CENTER ↗
- Who funds Centro La Familia Advocacy Services INC ↗
- Who funds OHIO HISPANIC COALITION ↗
- Who funds ASISTA IMMIGRANT ASSISTANCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hispanic Federation Inc · Latino Community Foundation · The Allstate Foundation · Tides Center · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Women's Foundation of California · Groundswell Fund · Baby2baby · Borealis Philanthropy · The Chicago Community Trust · The California Endowment · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Esperanza United funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Nuevo Sendero Inc — 100% of income from government
- Mujeres Unidas En Justicia Educacion Y Refforma Inc — 16% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.