Skip to content
Enterprise Community Partners Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Enterprise Community Partners Inc

Enterprise's mission is to make home and community places of pride, power and belonging, and platforms for resilience and upward mobility for all.

$75M
Granted FY2024still arriving
412
Grants FY2024still arriving
45
States reached
$11M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$256MCommunity Improvement$123MHuman Services$15MHealth$5.8MReligion$4.4MEnvironment$3.6MCrime & Legal$3.6MCivil Rights$3.4MOther$0
02FY2024 · 412 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $148k
  • $10k–50k206 grants · $6.1M
  • $50k–250k144 grants · $14M
  • $250k+43 grants · $54M
$45,000
Median grant
45
States reached
$942M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC$10,995,546
MODULE DESIGN INC$3,100,000
BUILD UP$3,100,000
GROUNDED SOLUTIONS NETWORK$3,100,000
NORTH CORKTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION$2,592,908
BAY AREA COMMUNITY SERVICES HOUSING CORP$2,494,775
HOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION$2,000,000
TLINGIT HAIDA REGIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY$2,000,000
COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$1,738,001
HYDRONIC SHELL TECHNOLOGIES INC$1,584,000
HYDRONIC SHELL TECHNOLOGIES LLC$1,500,000
JEFFERSON EAST INC$1,224,667
RENAISSANCE OF HOPE INC$1,114,250
BRIDGING COMMUNITIES INC$1,005,938
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVOCATES OF DETROIT$1,000,898
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $27.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOMESTEAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $240k → 9%HAWAIIAN LENDING & INVESTMENTS: $200k → 9%BRONXWORKS INC: $259k → 28%BRONXWORKS INC: $223k → 28%CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE OF ROCHESTER INC: $250k → 14%RISEBORO COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $863k → 20%RISEBORO COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $561k → 20%RISEBORO COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $381k → 20%PATH: $2.1M → 14%RISEBORO COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $276k → 20%CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC: $1.8M → 20%CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES: $583k → 20%LORI'S HANDS INC: $253k → 10%CENTRICA CARE NAVIGATORS: $288k → 12%LEADINGAGE MARYLAND INC: $190k → 6%UPPER SHORE AGING INC: $280k → 12%PRESBYTERIAN VILLAGES OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $275k → 8%QUEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $238k → 13%QUEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $223k → 13%QUEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $209k → 13%GULF COAST HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC: $1.1M → 23%GULF COAST HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC: $976k → 23%GULF COAST HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC: $230k → 23%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA DEVELOPMENT OFFICE: $550k → 9%LIFEBUILDERS: $175k → 21%LIFEBUILDERS: $175k → 21%REFUGEE WOMEN'S ALLIANCE (REWA): $185k → 9%OPEN DOORS FOR MULTICULTURAL FAMILIES: $300k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $314k → 9%SAMARITAS: $240k → 21%DREAM OF DETROIT: $319k → 21%DREAM OF DETROIT: $197k → 21%DREAM OF DETROIT: $167k → 21%CODY ROUGE COMMUNITY ACTION ALLIANCE: $505k → 21%CODY ROUGE COMMUNITY ACTION ALLIANCE: $340k → 21%CODY ROUGE COMMUNITY ACTION ALLIANCE: $190k → 21%CODY ROUGE COMMUNITY ACTION ALLIANCE: $190k → 21%HANNAN CENTER: $285k → 21%JOY SOUTHFIELD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $155k → 21%JOY SOUTHFIELD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $155k → 21%BRIDGING COMMUNITIES INC: $1.0M → 21%BRIDGING COMMUNITIES INC: $215k → 21%BRIDGING COMMUNITIES INC: $157k → 21%BRIGHTMOOR ALLIANCE INC: $470k → 21%URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD INITIATIVES INC: $269k → 21%URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD INITIATIVES INC: $215k → 21%URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD INITIATIVES INC: $194k → 21%URBAN NEIGHBORHOOD INITIATIVES INC: $190k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$286M · 665 repeat orgs$143M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

665 repeat relationships: 247 still active in FY2024, 418 since wound down; 163 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

665
529

Total granted

$286M
$118M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+20%

Still filing today

84%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesHealthEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20M · revenue +161%
  • LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $7.1M · revenue +135%
  • LR
    LAND REUTILIZATION CORPORATION OF THE CAPITAL REGION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $4.6M · revenue +56% · 83% of their budget

Funded once

  • WI
    Westhab Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $11M · revenue +65%
  • BG
    BREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION
    one grant, 2018 · $10M · revenue +18% · 33% of their budget
  • TC
    THE COMMUNITY PRESERVATION CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $9.9M · revenue +55%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeast Brooklyn Housing Develop

The Organization is commited to the preservation, development, and management of affordable housing and home ownership opportunities:community and economic development initiative and human services to effect social change in central…

Housing & Shelter
2
Neighborhood Housing Services of New Haven Inc

Community based housing program designed to stabilize neighborhoods mainly through loans to home owners unable to obtain alternative financing and construction and rehabilitation of housing, related services include technical assistance,…

Housing & Shelter
3
Neighborhood Nonprofit Housing Corp

Create quality affordable housing opportunities, enhance communities and provide households with skills to become self-sufficient.

Housing & Shelter
4
Chn Housing Capital

Chn housing capital is a certified community development financial institution serving low-income individuals and distressed communities guided by the belief that homeownership should be within everyone's reach.

Human Services
5
Community Services Housing Development Corporation

The stabilization of the community's housing stock through the development of low- and moderate income housing, with the creation of ancillary social service programs thereby enabling community residents and tenants to have safe, clean and…

Housing & Shelter
6
Neighborhood Housing Services of New Orleans Inc

Neighborhood housing services of new orleans, inc. revitalizes communities by increasing the number of homeowners and transforming vacant or substandard properties into sustainable homeownership. we improve quality of life through informed…

—
7
Home City Development Inc

1.to restore or replace substandard housing with a supply of decent, affordable, and well-managed housing for individuals and families.2.to facilitate neighborhood growth and health in collaboration with partners, leading to long-term…

Housing & Shelter
8
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
9
Community Housing Council
Housing & Shelter
10
Housing Connector

Housing connector partners with property owners and managers to lower barriers to housing and increase our region's affordable housing capacity.

Housing & Shelter
11
Partnership Housing Inc

Partnership housing, inc. brings people together to build homes, communities and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live.

Housing & Shelter
12
The Non-Profit Community Developmen Corporation of Dc

Npcdc's mission is to initate, sponsor and operate housing and economic development projects that create economic stability and upward mobility for low-income families in metropolitan washington, dc.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Resources for Community Development; the most unlike its peers is West 30s Redemption Company. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

1032 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1032 of the 1,367 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

100
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
301
Early backer (in before they grew)
988/1032
Grantees still filing
693/1032
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $19,624,496 · Housing & ShelterENTERPRISE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INCWesthab Inc: $10,871,660 · Housing & ShelterWesthab IncBREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION: $10,000,000 · Housing & ShelterBREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT …ALBANY COUNTY LAND BANK CORPORATION: $3,516,768 · Housing & Shelter+45 more: $59,194,383 · Housing & Shelter+45 moreSHANGRI-LA INDUSTRIES LLC: $4,224,000 · OtherEMMANUEL PROPERTIES INC: $4,064,623 · OtherSERVICES FOR THE UNDERSERVED INC: $3,575,518 · Other+83 more: $93,572,886 · Other+83 moreTHE COMMUNITY PRESERVATION CORPORATION: $9,873,401 · Community ImprovementTHE COMMUNITY PRESERVATI…LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $7,056,433 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPOR…LAND REUTILIZATION CORPORATION OF THE CAPITAL REGION: $4,646,760 · Community ImprovementLAND REUTILIZATION CORPO…ROCHESTER LAND BANK CORPORATION: $3,519,433 · Community ImprovementNORTH CORKTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION: $3,003,075 · Community ImprovementJASA CORPORATION: $3,000,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVOCATES OF DETROIT: $2,722,156 · Community Improvement+31 more: $35,310,907 · Community Improvement+31 moreGULF COAST HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC: $2,508,522 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC: $2,415,352 · Human ServicesRISEBORO COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $2,205,395 · Human ServicesPATH: $2,100,000 · Human ServicesBRIDGING COMMUNITIES INC: $1,803,938 · Human ServicesCody Rouge Community Action Alliance: $1,329,500 · Human ServicesUrban Neighborhood Initiatives Inc: $1,122,200 · Human ServicesTAHOE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $1,056,000 · Human ServicesBRIGHTMOOR ALLIANCE INC: $1,020,474 · Human ServicesQUEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION INC: $899,696 · Human ServicesDream of Detroit: $883,822 · Human ServicesEL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $776,230 · Human Services+4 more: $2,286,992 · Human ServicesGROUNDED SOLUTIONS NETWORK: $3,100,000 · HealthHealthy Community Forum for Sacramento Region dba Community HealthWorks: $2,100,000 · HealthGRACE GUILD OF SINAI GRACE HOSPITAL AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $1,345,000 · HealthDETROITERS WORKING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: $1,037,500 · HealthDowntown Emergency Service Center: $691,256 · HealthPROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES - WASHINGTON: $576,000 · HealthAdventist Health Clearlake Hospital Inc: $480,000 · HealthBUILD UP: $3,100,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $2,270,525 · Youth DevelopmentYoung Scholars For Academic Empowerment dba TruEvolution Inc: $834,840 · Youth DevelopmentGREATER SYRACUSE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $3,000,514 · Public Benefit
Housing & Shelter$103,207,307Other$105,437,027Community Improvement$69,132,165Human Services$20,408,121Health$9,329,756Youth Development$6,205,365Public Benefit$3,000,514

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetENTERPRISE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $19,624,496 over 4y, 9.6% of budgetWesthab Inc: $10,871,660 over 1y, 10% of budgetBREAKING GROUND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION: $10,000,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY PRESERVATION CORPORATION: $9,873,401 over 1y, 12% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $7,056,433 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetLAND REUTILIZATION CORPORATION OF THE CAPITAL REGION: $4,646,760 over 4y, 83% of budgetEMMANUEL PROPERTIES INC: $4,064,623 over 2y, 95% of budgetSERVICES FOR THE UNDERSERVED INC: $3,575,518 over 5y, 9.8% of budgetROCHESTER LAND BANK CORPORATION: $3,519,433 over 4y, 72% of budgetALBANY COUNTY LAND BANK CORPORATION: $3,516,768 over 4y, 39% of budgetGROUNDED SOLUTIONS NETWORK: $3,100,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetNORTH CORKTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION: $3,003,075 over 4y, 64% of budgetGREATER SYRACUSE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $3,000,514 over 4y, 5.4% of budgetNATIONAL HOUSING TRUST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND: $2,900,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetITHACA NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC: $2,763,718 over 4y, 21% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVOCATES OF DETROIT: $2,722,156 over 5y, 98% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR NEW YORK CITY NEIGHBORHOODS INC: $2,665,247 over 6y, 6.9% of budgetHOME HEADQUARTERS INC: $2,539,353 over 2y, 13% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS FOR EQUALITY INC: $2,514,767 over 7y, 9.1% of budgetGULF COAST HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC: $2,508,522 over 7y, 5.0% of budgetBay Area Community Services Housing Corp: $2,494,775 over 1y, 21% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC: $2,415,352 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF BROWNSVILLE DBA COME DREAM COME BUILD: $2,408,070 over 3y, 17% of budgetLIFEMOVES: $2,400,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetHOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION: $2,304,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetOSWEGO COUNTY LAND BANK CORPORATION: $2,299,981 over 4y, 83% of budgetGRANDMONT ROSEDALE DEVELOPMENT CORP: $2,271,437 over 6y, 43% of budgetCOALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $2,270,525 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetWASHINGTON COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT ASSOCIATION: $2,260,735 over 2y, 36% of budgetRISEBORO COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC: $2,205,395 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetPATH: $2,100,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetHealthy Community Forum for Sacramento Region dba Community HealthWorks: $2,100,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetCENTRAL DETROIT CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $2,092,525 over 6y, 14% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD RENEWAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION: $2,060,650 over 1y, 60% of budgetTlingit-Haida Regional Housing Authority: $2,050,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetNEWBURGH COMMUNITY LAND BANK: $2,005,451 over 4y, 94% of budgetWARRENCONNER DEVELOPMENT COALITION: $1,956,938 over 5y, 15% of budgetCHAUTAUQUA COUNTY LAND BANK CORPORATION: $1,921,681 over 4y, 21% of budgetWEST END RESIDENCES HDFC INC DBA HOMEWARD NYC: $1,878,962 over 2y, 33% of budgetHOUSING OPPORTUNITIES MADE EQUAL INC: $1,865,224 over 5y, 40% of budgetBRIDGING COMMUNITIES INC: $1,803,938 over 6y, 50% of budgetPRESERVATION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC: $1,756,720 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetJEFFERSON EAST INC: $1,687,167 over 8y, 32% of budgetRENAISSANCE OF HOPE INC: $1,664,417 over 2y, 60% of budgetLATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $1,611,759 over 6y, 8.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD PROGRESS INC: $1,595,000 over 8y, 6.2% of budgetMERCY HOUSING CALIFORNIA: $1,556,420 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetCommunity Association of Progressive Dominicans Inc: $1,550,000 over 1y, 18% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Neighborhood Reinvest…National Association …Wells Fargo FoundationCommunity Development…Corporation for Suppo…Capital One Foundatio…National Equity Fund …The Housing Partnersh…Mufg Union Bank Found…Texas State Affordabl…The Kresge FoundationCiti Foundation
Neighborhood Reinvestment CorporationDC113.4× affinity107 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation · National Association for Latino Community Asset Builders · Wells Fargo Foundation · Community Development Advocates of Detroit · Corporation for Supportive Housing · Capital One Foundation Inc · National Equity Fund Inc · The Housing Partnership Network Inc · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · Texas State Affordable Housing Corporation · The Kresge Foundation · Citi Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Enterprise Community Partners Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Enterprise Community Partners Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Govans Ecumenical Development Corp: 28% of income from government
  • Enterprise Community Loan Fund Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Rebuild Metro Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Preservation of Affordable Housing Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Enterprise Community Development Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
64report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1367 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Enterprise Community Partners’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home