Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Corporation for Supportive Housing

See schedule oto advance housing solutions that deliver three powerful outcomes: 1) improved lives for vulnerable people, 2) maximized public resources and 3) strong, healthy communities across the country.

$11M
Granted FY2024still arriving
40
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Housing & Shelter$40MHuman Services$20MHealth$16MCommunity Improvement$3.0MCrime & Legal$2.2MYouth Development$1.3MPhilanthropy$178kEducation$133kOther$0
02FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+18 grants · $9.8M
$166,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$390M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EDEN INC$1,688,678
INTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$1,644,035
TALBERT HOUSE$1,201,071
MIAMI VALLEY HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES (MVHO)$805,888
FAITH MISSION$490,000
COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES$359,505
LICKING COUNTY COALITION FOR HOUSING INC$353,000
WESTERN TIDEWATER COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD$300,000
JUDEO CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTER$300,000
VIRGINIA BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$300,000
WODA COOPER DEVELOPMENT INC$300,000
MORE$300,000
AHC INC$300,000
BAY AGING$300,000
ARLINGTON PARTNERSHIP FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC$300,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $20.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BROOKLYN COMMUNITY HOUSING AND SERVICES INC: $75k → 20%FORT BEND COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTER: $1.1M → 8%TALBERT HOUSE: $1.3M → 16%INTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $292k → 22%BAY AGING: $300k → 12%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $225k → 11%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $100k → 14%BROOKLYN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $75k → 20%TALBERT HOUSE: $1.2M → 16%BRONX HEALTH & HOUSING CONSORTIUM: $60k → 28%HOMEFULL: $354k → 14%TALBERT HOUSE: $999k → 16%HOMEFULL: $314k → 14%TALBERT HOUSE: $875k → 16%HOMEFULL: $213k → 14%TALBERT HOUSE: $510k → 16%HOMEFULL: $183k → 14%HOMEFULL: $134k → 14%YMCA OF CENTRAL OHIO: $242k → 15%HOMEFULL: $94k → 14%FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $579k → 12%YMCA OF CENTRAL OHIO: $225k → 15%FRONTLINE SERVICE: $97k → 17%FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $302k → 12%FRONTLINE SERVICE INC: $90k → 17%FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $296k → 12%YMCA OF CENTRAL OHIO: $205k → 15%HOMELESS HEALTH CARE LOS ANGELES: $50k → 14%FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $278k → 12%YMCA OF CENTRAL OHIO: $193k → 15%FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $270k → 12%FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $206k → 12%YMCA OF CENTRAL OHIO: $90k → 15%LIGHTHOUSE YOUTH SERVICES INC: $61k → 16%FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $135k → 12%HOMEFULL: $294k → 14%FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $95k → 12%HOMEFULL: $124k → 14%INTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $1.7M → 15%TALBERT HOUSE: $1.2M → 16%WATTS LABOR COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE: $50k → 14%TALBERT HOUSE: $1.0M → 16%INTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH: $1.6M → 15%TALBERT HOUSE: $1.0M → 16%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND REHABILITATION PROGRAM (SCHARP): $175k → 14%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS (PATH): $325k → 14%UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $50k → 14%BOLD COMMUNITIES: $175k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
IN
OH
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$65M · 45 repeat orgs$17M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

45 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
110

Total granted

$65M
$15M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+23%

Still filing today

87%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ED
    EMERALD DEVELOPMENT & ECONOMIC NETWORK
    8× · 2017–2024 · $12M · revenue +82%
  • IS
    INTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $11M · revenue +294%
  • TH
    TALBERT HOUSE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $8.1M · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • NH
    New Hope Housing Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3.9M · revenue +190% · 73% of their budget
  • TN
    THE NHP FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1.5M · revenue -63%
  • FB
    FORT BEND COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTER INC SOS/SHELTER-OUTREACH-SOLUTIONS
    one grant, 2020 · $1.1M · revenue +0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Human Services Corporation

Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.

Human Services
2
Community Housing Council
Housing & Shelter
3
Housing Options and Geriatric Association Resources Inc

To assist societys most disenfranchised; the elderly, seriously mentally ill adults, the homeless, people living with AIDS and the physically challenged by promoting, fostering and providing the highest quality of housing and services in a…

Health
4
Triple C Housing Inc

To provide permanent supportive housing opportunities coupled with innovative support services empowering indivduals to live independently with dignity and to fullfull their utmost potential.

—
5
Community Housing Works

Community housingworks ("chw or the organization") is a nonprofit california corporation incorporated on june 20, 1988. chw believes that opportunity begins with a stable home. the organization provides and builds life-changing affordable…

Housing & Shelter
6
Chicago House & Social Service Agency

Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids

Health
7
Bay Area Community Services Housing Corp

Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.

Housing & Shelter
8
Shine Bc-La

Provide housing and services to the most vulnerable population, especially those transitioning from (or at risk of) homelessness or institutionalization, through a variety of innovative supportive housing models.

Education
9
Mercy House Living Centers

Mercy house's most significant exempt activities focus on ending homelessness and providing comprehensive housing and support services. the organization offers homeless prevention, rapid rehousing, permanent supportive housing, and…

Housing & Shelter
10
Central City Concern

The mission of Central City Concern (CCC) is to provide comprehensive solutions for ending homelessness and achieving self-sufficiency. Founded in 1979, CCC has developed a comprehensive continuum of affordable housing options integrated…

Health
11
Housing Choices Coalition for Persons With Developmental Disabilities Inc

To enhance the lives of people with developmental and other disabilities by creating quality, affordable housing options.

Housing & Shelter
12
Community Housing Sonoma County

Community Housing Sonoma County creates supportive housing communities for people living with disabling conditions, especially veterans.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pathway Homes Inc and the most unlike its peers is More. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Community FoundationsAddiction Recovery ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportYouth Development ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyDevelopmental Disabilities …Health Access Advocacy and …Senior Support ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Ymca Youth DevelopmentDomestic Violence Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%2%<5yr12%5%5–10yr21%7%10–20yr14%30%20–35yr16%38%35–55yr20%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%1%<5yr12%0%5–10yr21%1%10–20yr14%36%20–35yr16%45%35–55yr20%17%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/176
the rest of the field
11%
8,036/74,130

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

144 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 144 of the 176 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
142/144
Grantees still filing
103/144
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EMERALD DEVELOPMENT & ECONOMIC NETWORK — $12,182,671 · Housing & ShelterEMERALD DEVELOPMENT & ECONOMIC NETWORKMIAMI VALLEY HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES INC — $5,861,419 · Housing & ShelterMIAMI VALLEY HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES INCNew Hope Housing Inc — $3,900,000 · Housing & ShelterNew Hope Housing IncLICKING COUNTY COALITION FOR HOUSING INC — $3,032,947 · Housing & ShelterLICKING COUNTY COALITION FOR HOUSING INCFAITH MISSION INC — $2,695,782 · Housing & ShelterFAITH MISSION INCTHE NHP FOUNDATION — $1,497,500 · Housing & Shelter+37 more — $4,913,118 · Housing & Shelter+37 moreINTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $11,201,067 · Human ServicesINTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEA…TALBERT HOUSE — $8,054,467 · Human ServicesTALBERT HOUSEFAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $2,159,435 · Human ServicesFAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INCHOMEFULL — $1,709,921 · Human ServicesHOMEFULLFORT BEND COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTER INC SOS/SHELTER-OUTREACH-SOLUTIONS — $1,100,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL OHIO — $955,310 · Human Services+34 more — $2,998,918 · Human Services+34 moreNEW HOUSING OHIO INC — $2,319,697 · HealthNEW HOUSING …TASC OF NORTHWEST OHIO — $2,090,686 · HealthTASC OF NORT…COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES INC — $1,729,045 · HealthCOMMUNITY SU…Greater Cincinnati Behavioral Health Services — $1,146,035 · HealthGreater Cinc…COLEMAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC — $997,410 · HealthCOLEMAN PROF…+18 more — $1,001,700 · Health+18 moreWOODLAWN ROLL UP ASSOCIATES PRESERVATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP — $776,000 · OtherWOODLAWN R…WASHINGTON TERRACE AFFORDABLE HOSUING LLC — $776,000 · OtherWASHINGTON…MHMP HOLLY PARK EAST AND WEST — $776,000 · OtherMHMP HOLLY…TRUE GROUND HOUSING PARTNERS INC — $600,000 · OtherTRUE GROUN…Cook County Health Chicago — $546,803 · OtherCook Count…BELLSITE DEVELOPMENT LLC (LOAN) — $410,000 · OtherCOUNCIL OF LARGE PUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORI AUTHORITIES — $367,360 · OtherSupportWorks Housing — $315,000 · OtherWESLEY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA — $300,000 · OtherWODA COOPER DEVELOPMENT INC — $300,000 · OtherWESTERN TIDEWATER COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH RETARDATION SERVICES BOARD — $300,000 · OtherMORE — $300,000 · Other+44 more — $2,145,252 · Other+44 moreTEJANO CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CONCERNS INC — $1,019,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — $325,000 · Youth DevelopmentJohn Burton Advocates for Youth — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS INC — $75,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentVirginia Beach Community Development Corporation — $300,000 · Community ImprovementBEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE — $221,612 · Community ImprovementTHE MAYOR'S FUND TO ADVANCE NEW YORK CITY — $50,000 · Community Improvement+4 more — $33,546 · Community ImprovementSKID ROW HOUSING TRUST — $425,000 · PhilanthropySOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS — $178,000 · Philanthropy
Housing & Shelter$34,083,437Human Services$28,179,118Health$9,284,573Other$7,912,415Youth Development$1,544,000Community Improvement$605,158Philanthropy$603,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEMERALD DEVELOPMENT & ECONOMIC NETWORK — $12,182,671 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetINTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $11,201,067 over 8y, 11% of budgetTALBERT HOUSE — $8,054,467 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetMIAMI VALLEY HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES INC — $5,861,419 over 8y, 12% of budgetNew Hope Housing Inc — $3,900,000 over 1y, 73% of budgetLICKING COUNTY COALITION FOR HOUSING INC — $3,032,947 over 8y, 23% of budgetFAITH MISSION INC — $2,695,782 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetNEW HOUSING OHIO INC — $2,319,697 over 8y, 7.5% of budgetFAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $2,159,435 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetTASC OF NORTHWEST OHIO — $2,090,686 over 8y, 15% of budgetCOMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES INC — $1,729,045 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetHOMEFULL — $1,709,921 over 8y, 7.0% of budgetTHE NHP FOUNDATION — $1,497,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetGreater Cincinnati Behavioral Health Services — $1,146,035 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetFORT BEND COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTER INC SOS/SHELTER-OUTREACH-SOLUTIONS — $1,100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTEJANO CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CONCERNS INC — $1,019,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetCOLEMAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC — $997,410 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL OHIO — $955,310 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $642,285 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetCenter for Housing and Health — $607,600 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetHOUSING WORKS — $603,750 over 5y, 9.6% of budgetTRUE GROUND HOUSING PARTNERS INC — $600,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSKID ROW HOUSING TRUST — $425,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOUNCIL OF LARGE PUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORI AUTHORITIES — $367,360 over 2y, 12% of budgetPATH — $360,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — $325,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSupportWorks Housing — $315,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetBAY AGING — $300,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCORNERSTONES HOUSING CORPORATION — $300,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetWESLEY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA — $300,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMORE — $300,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetPATHWAY HOMES INC — $300,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetVirginia Beach Community Development Corporation — $300,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetAHC INC — $300,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYOUTH CONTINUUM INC — $300,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetJUDEO-CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTERINC — $300,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetLTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $275,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA — $255,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEAST LA COMMUNITY CORPORATION — $225,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SPOKANE — $225,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE — $221,612 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBRIDGEPORT NEIGHBORHOOD TRUST — $200,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER — $191,750 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR HOMELESS PERSONS INC — $186,935 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS — $178,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAFFORDABLE LIVING FOR THE AGING — $175,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetBOLD COMMUNITIES — $175,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HEALTH & REHABILITATION PROGRAM — $175,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EMERALD DEVELOPMENT & ECONOMIC NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds INTEGRATED SERVICES FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds TALBERT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds MIAMI VALLEY HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds New Hope Housing Inc ↗
  • Who funds LICKING COUNTY COALITION FOR HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds FAITH MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HOUSING OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds TASC OF NORTHWEST OHIO ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEFULL ↗
  • Who funds THE NHP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Greater Cincinnati Behavioral Health Services ↗
  • Who funds FORT BEND COUNTY WOMEN'S CENTER INC SOS/SHELTER-OUTREACH-SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds TEJANO CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CONCERNS INC ↗
  • Who funds COLEMAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL OHIO ↗
  • Who funds TENDERLOIN NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Center for Housing and Health ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING WORKS ↗
  • Who funds TRUE GROUND HOUSING PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds SKID ROW HOUSING TRUST ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL OF LARGE PUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORI AUTHORITIES ↗
  • Who funds PATH ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds SupportWorks Housing ↗
  • Who funds BAY AGING ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONES HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WESLEY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds MORE ↗
  • Who funds PATHWAY HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds Virginia Beach Community Development Corporation ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way IncShelter Partnership I…Enterprise Community …The Ralph M Parsons F…The Rose Hills Founda…The Ahmanson Foundati…Cedars-Sinai Medical …Weingart FoundationCalifornia Community …Coalition on Homeless…THDF II Inc DBA The H…Kaiser Foundation Hos…
United Way IncCA49.5× affinity24 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Inc · Shelter Partnership Inc · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · Weingart Foundation · California Community Foundation · Coalition on Homelessness and Housing in Ohio · THDF II Inc DBA The Home Depot Foundation & Homer Fund · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Corporation for Supportive Housing funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • The Housing Collective Inc — 100% of income from government
  • Thames Valley Council for Community Action Inc — 83% of income from government
  • Community Health Resources Inc — 79% of income from government
  • Youth Continuum Inc — 76% of income from government
  • Connecticut Coalition to End Homelessness Inc — 54% of income from government
  • New London Homeless Hospitality Center — 47% of income from government
  • Pacific House Inc — 46% of income from government
  • Mutual Housing Association of Greater Hartford Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Identity Inc — 7% of income from government
  • The Community Builders Inc — 4% of income from government
  • National Center for Children and Families — 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
47report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 176 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home