· Private foundation
Engelsma Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k30 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $332k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YouthLink | $50,250 |
| PARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION | $45,000 |
| SUMMIT ACADEMY OIC | $36,000 |
| FRASER | $29,000 |
| DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY | $26,000 |
| Regions Hospital Foundation | $25,000 |
| GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY | $25,000 |
| Childrens Health Care Foundation | $25,000 |
| N C LITTLE MEMORIAL HOSPICE INC | $20,000 |
| Washburn Center for Children | $15,000 |
| FIREFIGHTERS FOR HEALING | $15,000 |
| Pinky Swear Foundation | $15,000 |
| Childrens Theater Company & School | $15,000 |
| WILDFLYER COFFEE | $11,000 |
| Layla Julien Foundation | $10,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $809k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
75 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2025, 42 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFRASER9× · 2017–2025 · $302k · revenue +51%
- SASUMMIT ACADEMY OIC9× · 2017–2025 · $233k · revenue +39%
- UVURBAN VENTURES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $175k · revenue +30%
Funded once
- MPMN PEACEBUILDING LEADERSHIP INSTone grant, 2019 · $33k
- FHFairview Health Servicesgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +38%
- AGASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF MN Fone grant, 2023 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
The foundation cultivates generosity by taking action on the greatest civic, social, and economic needs partnering with nonprofits, facilitating grantmaking, driving research and advocacy, and providing services to donors seeking to make a…
United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.
To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…
Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.
The mission of the foundation for health care continuums is to strengthen each community we serve by providing a wide spectrum of housing and health care services that honor the evolving, aging population.
Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.
Avivo increases well-being through recovery and career advancement while working to end homelessness.
We believe that great schools are the cornerstone of a just and thriving community. ensuring that every child is able to attend a school that works is our moral and social imperative - our children deserve no less.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Health Care Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Pomona College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
149 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 149 of the 171 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRASER ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT ACADEMY OIC ↗
- Who funds URBAN VENTURES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GUSTAVUS ADOLPHUS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY ↗
- Who funds REGIONS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds N C LITTLE MEMORIAL HOSPICE INC ↗
- Who funds PARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PINKY SWEAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Washburn Center for Children ↗
- Who funds AT HOME GROUP ↗
- Who funds Wildflyer Coffee ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF CHARITY ↗
- Who funds MOUNT OLIVET ROLLING ACRES INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Theatre Company and School ↗
- Who funds Animal Humane Society ↗
- Who funds FIREFIGHTERS FOR HEALING ↗
- Who funds ONEVILLAGE PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds MICROGRANTS ↗
- Who funds YOUTHLINK ↗
- Who funds SAINT PAUL & MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AGATE HOUSING & SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LAYLA JULIEN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HELPING PAWS INC ↗
- Who funds TREEHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HOPEKIDS INC ↗
- Who funds ABBOTT NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIFE TIME FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Women's Foundation of Minnesota ↗
- Who funds JACKS CAREGIVER COALITION ↗
- Who funds Fairview Health Services ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA INDEPENDENCE COLLEGE AND COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds HEALTHEAST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Karen Wyckoff Rein in Sarcoma ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Walser Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation · Wem Foundation · Target Foundation · The K Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Engelsma Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Black Women Build - Baltimore Inc — 10% of income from government
- Center for Food Action in New Jersey — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Engelsma Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Engelsma Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.