· Private foundation
Wem Foundation
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k14 grants · $56k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $265k
- $50k–250k22 grants · $2.7M
- $250k+86 grants · $356M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION | $75,165,000 |
| MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ART | $25,050,000 |
| THE LEARNING ALLIANCE | $20,000,000 |
| WILLIAMS COLLEGE | $15,000,000 |
| RIVERSIDE THEATRE | $10,050,000 |
| VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART | $10,030,000 |
| ABBOTT NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $10,000,000 |
| MINNEAPOLIS PARKS FOUNDATION | $10,000,000 |
| GUTHRIE THEATER | $8,225,000 |
| PROJECT SUCCESS | $7,100,000 |
| NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE | $6,250,000 |
| NATURE CONSERVANCY | $6,100,000 |
| GROVES ACADEMY | $5,255,000 |
| CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL | $5,150,000 |
| GREAT MN SCHOOLS | $5,100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $20.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
124 repeat relationships — 94 still active in FY2023, 30 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION4× · 2020–2023 · $75M · revenue +25%- DCDUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY4× · 2020–2023 · $31M · revenue +42% · 47% of their budget
- MSMINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS4× · 2020–2023 · $27M · revenue +73% · 39% of their budget
Funded once
- YUYALE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2020 · $13M
- MSMontana State University Foundation Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10M · revenue +114%
- MOMUSEUM OF THE ROCKIES - MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2022 · $6.5M
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
Move minnesota leads the movement for an equitable and sustainable transportation system that puts people first. we are passionate about connecting communities, ending the climate crisis, expanding access to jobs and resources, and…
Mity's mission is to inspire and challenge intellectually curious students to pursue their passions within a diverse, inclusive community and empower them by building skills and relationships for lifelong success.
Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.
Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.
Led by minnesota state university students, we are the inclusive voice for all future, current, and former students. we actively work to represent and support minnesota state university students and advocate at a campus, state, and federal…
United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.
The foundation cultivates generosity by taking action on the greatest civic, social, and economic needs partnering with nonprofits, facilitating grantmaking, driving research and advocacy, and providing services to donors seeking to make a…
Breakthrough Twin Cities supports students on their journey to college by fostering a community of mutual learning with the next generation of educators so they both can collaborate, grow, and thrive.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Outreach and Community Partners and the most unlike its peers is Mattys Heart and Soul Animal Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
153 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 153 of the 209 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds MINNEAPOLIS SOCIETY OF FINE ARTS DBA MINNEAPOLIS INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds ABBOTT NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds VERO BEACH MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds Minneapolis Parks Foundation ↗
- Who funds Montana State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT NORTH ↗
- Who funds GUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREAT MN SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds PROJECT SUCCESS ↗
- Who funds HOPE ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE ↗
- Who funds TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC ↗
- Who funds GROVES ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds WAY TO GROW ↗
- Who funds MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN VENTURES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT ACADEMY OIC ↗
- Who funds PRODEO ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL #4213 ↗
- Who funds MACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · The Walser Foundation · Joyful Noise Charitable Foundation · Mortenson Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Sauer Family Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation · Ciresi Walburn Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wem Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wild Salmon Center — 49% of income from government
- National History Day Inc — 13% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- United Way of Indian River County Inc — 1% of income from government
- Yale New Haven Hospital — 0% of income from government
- Indian River Land Trust Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Learning Alliance Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Wem Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Wem Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.