Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Community foundation

Eau Claire Community Foundation

To establish endowed funds that will benefit the eau claire community today and in the future.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
46
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$201k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Arts & Culture$8.0MEducation$2.1MHuman Services$1.2MYouth Development$932kHealth$646kReligion$629kPhilanthropy$484kFood & Nutrition$444kOther$0
02FY2024 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 46 grants below total $1,296,558 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,930,642 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $634,084 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k28 grants · $551k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $671k
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$56M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA OF CHIPPEWA VALLEY$201,000
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LOYAL$115,556
BOBS HOUSE FOR DOGS$100,000
ST MARYS ASSUMPTION PARISH$90,000
WATDA FOUNDATION$60,000
FRIENDS OF BEAVER CREEK RESERVE$54,000
JR ACHIEVEMENT OF WI N AND W CENT R$50,744
EAU CLAIRE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$43,090
SPRING FORWARD LEARNING CENTER$40,000
PARTNERS OF MARSHFIELD MEDICAL CENT$36,919
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE GREATER C$30,755
LE PHILLIPS MEORIAL PUBLIC LIBRARY$30,740
CHIPPEWA VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANIT$30,120
CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF EAU CLAIRE$27,000
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LADYSMITH$25,850
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CASA DE ESPERANZA: $9k → 14%COURAGEOUS WOMEN ASSOCIATION: $9k → 10%CALIFORNIA WOMEN'S MUSIC FESTIVAL: $10k → 15%HOUR CHILDREN INC: $12k → 13%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $22k → 17%SAVING GRACE IMAGINE LIFE WITHOUT VIOLENCE: $9k → 10%HOPEWORKS OF HOWARD COUNTY: $8k → 6%THROUGH THESE DOORS: $7k → 7%SURVIVING IN NUMBERS: $10k → 14%LA CROSSE AREA VETERANS MENTOR PROG: $10k → 12%THE HUB HOMELESS SERVICES INC: $59k → 10%THE HUB HOMELESS SERVICES INC: $20k → 10%EMBRACE SERVICES INC: $10k → 13%EMBRACE SERVICES INC: $10k → 13%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $10k → 10%YMCA OF CHIPPEWA VALLEY: $201k → 12%YMCA OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY: $168k → 12%YMCA OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY: $77k → 12%YMCA OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY: $59k → 12%YMCA OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY: $46k → 12%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN INC: $38k → 12%YMCA OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY: $38k → 12%YMCA - EAU CLAIRE: $35k → 12%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $24k → 12%YMCA - EAU CLAIRE: $21k → 12%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN INC: $18k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY: $18k → 12%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $16k → 12%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $15k → 12%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $14k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY: $13k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY: $13k → 12%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $13k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY: $12k → 12%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN INC: $9k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY: $8k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY: $7k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS-NORTHWEST WISCONSIN CHAPTER: $12k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS-NORTHWEST WISCONSIN CHAPTER: $12k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS-NORTHWEST WISCONSIN CHAPTER: $7k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS-NORTHWEST WISCONSIN CHAPTER: $7k → 12%THE COMMUNITY TABLE: $42k → 12%THE COMMUNITY TABLE: $31k → 12%ST FRANCIS FOOD PANTRY: $20k → 12%THE COMMUNITY TABLE: $19k → 12%BOLTON REFUGE HOUSE INC: $15k → 12%THE COMMUNITY TABLE: $15k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
PA
CA
UT
CO
MO
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$15M · 86 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

86 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2024, 48 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

86
83

Total granted

$15M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+19%

Still filing today

81%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $204k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    EAU CLAIRE CONFLUENCE ARTS INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $5.6M · revenue +31%
  • TY
    THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $644k · revenue +202%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE GREATER CHIPPEWA VALLEY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $425k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • HL
    HAYWARD LIBRARY FOUNDATION LTDgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $181k · revenue +93%
  • CO
    CITY OF ALTOONA
    one grant, 2019 · $67k
  • AO
    ADRC OF CHIPPEWA COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · $40k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Disability Rights Wisconsin Inc

Legal protection and advocacy to protect the rights of people with disabilities in wisconsin.

—
2
Wisconsin School Counselor Association Inc

Our vision is for wisconsin to be the model for excellence in equitable school counseling practice, exemplified by the advocacy, leadership, and expertise of the members of the wsca.

—
3
Wisconsin Rapids Family Center Inc

Our mission is to empower those affected by domestic violence and sexual assault and address the root causes of abuse in the community through education and advocacy.

—
4
Cap Services Inc

Cap services, inc.'s mission is to transform people and communities to advance social and economic justice.

Human Services
5
Eau Claire Area Chamber of Commerce

The eau claire area chamber of commerce, a not-for-profit business membership organization with steady membership around 1,200 members, is the advocate of business striving to enhance and protect the business environment and quality of…

—
6
Casa of East Central Wisconsin

The mission of casa of east central wisconsin is to advocate for the best interest of children who have experienced abuse or neglect, who are in need of court protection, to ensure they have a safe and permanent home and the opportunity to…

Crime & Legal
7
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
8
Legal Action of Wisconsin Inc

Legal action exists to provide creative, effective, and high-quality legal representation in order to achieve justice for low-income people and others to whom it would otherwise be denied. we advocate for empowerment and systemic change to…

Crime & Legal
9
Minnesota Valley Action Council Inc

Develop resources and opportunities which empower people and communities.

Community Improvement
10
Child Advocacy Centers of Wisconsin

Establish and maintain child advocacy centers and teams in wisconsin.

Human Services
11
Advocacy Center of Winona

The advocacy center of winona's mission is to end domestic and sexual violence in winona county.

—
12
Oshkosh Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc

To promote oshkosh and winnebago county a premier destination for corporate, sports, and leisure groups and individual visitors.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Courageous Women Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%2%<5yr12%7%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr16%28%35–55yr19%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%0%<5yr12%23%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr16%16%35–55yr19%21%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/177
the rest of the field
8%
3,021/36,349

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

143 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 143 of the 178 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
38
Early backer (in before they grew)
139/143
Grantees still filing
97/143
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EAU CLAIRE CONFLUENCE ARTS INC — $5,626,238 · Arts & CultureEAU CLAIRE CONFLUENCE ARTS INCEAU CLAIRE CONFLUENCE FOUNDATION INC — $1,719,924 · Arts & CultureEAU CLAIRE CONFLUENCE FOUNDATION INC+10 more — $623,348 · Arts & Culture+10 moreSCHOOL DISTRICT OF LOYAL — $632,304 · OtherSCHOOL DISTRICT OF LOYALST MARYS ASSUMPTION PARISH — $448,500 · OtherST MARYS ASSUMPTION PARISHFEED MY PEOPLE INC — $252,269 · OtherFEED MY PEOPLE INCEAU CLAIRE CITY-COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT — $185,299 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC — $175,319 · Other+84 more — $2,729,109 · Other+84 moreTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY — $643,794 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG …THE COMMUNITY TABLE INC — $141,230 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUN…BOLTON REFUGE HOUSE INC — $111,506 · Human ServicesBOLTON REF…FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $87,610 · Human ServicesFAMILY RES…LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN INC — $81,296 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN S…HUB HOMELESS SERVICES INC — $79,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY INC — $70,097 · Human Services+26 more — $305,065 · Human Services+26 moreUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC — $299,605 · EducationHAYWARD LIBRARY FOUNDATION LTD — $181,226 · EducationEAU CLAIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $89,358 · EducationTHE FOUNDATION OF THE WISCONSIN AUTOMOBILE & TRUCK DEALERS ASSOCIATION — $80,000 · EducationLITERACY CHIPPEWA VALLEY — $75,714 · EducationCHIPPEWA VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $68,895 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $46,500 · EducationSPRING FORWARD LEARNING CENTER — $40,000 · Education+6 more — $84,566 · EducationBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE GREATER CHIPPEWA VALLEY INC — $424,891 · Youth DevelopmentBig Brothers Big Sisters of 7 Rivers Region Inc — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $82,092 · Youth DevelopmentJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA — $52,711 · Youth Development+3 more — $28,106 · Youth DevelopmentCHIPPEWA VALLEY HEALTH CLINIC INC — $255,517 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $58,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC — $53,000 · HealthTHE WELLNESS SHACK INC — $40,920 · HealthHospital Sisters of St Francis Foundation Inc — $19,290 · Health+11 more — $90,431 · HealthHOPE GOSPEL MISSION INC — $304,578 · PhilanthropyBETTENDORF COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $115,630 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE GREATER CHIPPEWA VALLEY INC — $29,000 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC — $28,862 · Philanthropy+3 more — $24,757 · Philanthropy
Arts & Culture$7,969,510Other$4,422,800Human Services$1,519,598Education$965,864Youth Development$687,800Health$517,658Philanthropy$502,827

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEAU CLAIRE CONFLUENCE ARTS INC — $5,626,238 over 7y, 20% of budgetEAU CLAIRE CONFLUENCE FOUNDATION INC — $1,719,924 over 2y, 17% of budgetTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY — $643,794 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE GREATER CHIPPEWA VALLEY INC — $424,891 over 8y, 5.2% of budgetHOPE GOSPEL MISSION INC — $304,578 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC — $299,605 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetCHIPPEWA VALLEY HEALTH CLINIC INC — $255,517 over 8y, 7.0% of budgetFEED MY PEOPLE INC — $252,269 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF EAU CLAIRE INC — $241,714 over 8y, 19% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC — $175,319 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY TABLE INC — $141,230 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetLE PHILLIPS SENIOR CENTER INC — $138,580 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetCHIPPEWA VALLEY COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $136,983 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetEAU CLAIRE ASSOCIATION OF MUSEUMS INC — $126,541 over 8y, 6.5% of budgetCOURTE OREILLES LAKES ASSOCIATION INC — $124,427 over 4y, 34% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHWESTERN WISCONSIN INC — $120,510 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF BEAVER CREEK RESERVE — $118,010 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetBETTENDORF COMMUNITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $115,630 over 4y, 54% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC — $111,632 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBOLTON REFUGE HOUSE INC — $111,506 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetCONFLUENCE COUNCIL INC — $107,091 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetFALL CREEK AREA FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 71% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of 7 Rivers Region Inc — $100,000 over 5y, 22% of budgetBobshouse 4Dogs Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetEAU CLAIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $89,358 over 4y, 7.1% of budgetREGIS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $89,210 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $87,610 over 6y, 8.6% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $82,092 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN INC — $81,296 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEAU CLAIRE COMMUNITY HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC — $80,160 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION OF THE WISCONSIN AUTOMOBILE & TRUCK DEALERS ASSOCIATION — $80,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetHUB HOMELESS SERVICES INC — $79,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetLITERACY CHIPPEWA VALLEY — $75,714 over 6y, 7.4% of budgetLANDMARK CONSERVANCY INC — $75,560 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetWESTERN DAIRYLAND ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC — $71,438 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY INC — $70,097 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetCHIPPEWA VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $68,895 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetAMERICAN BIRKEBEINER SKI FOUNDATION INC — $64,439 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $58,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEAU CLAIRE AREA HMONG MUTUAL ASSIST — $55,482 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetEAU CLAIRE CHILDRENS THEATRE INC — $54,865 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetCHIPPEWA VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $53,252 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC — $53,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA — $52,711 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE REACH FOUNDATION INC — $47,151 over 6y, 59% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $46,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $43,035 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WELLNESS SHACK INC — $40,920 over 2y, 21% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pablo Foundation IncThe Jamf Nation Globa…Mayo Clinic Group Ret…Xcel Energy FoundationGreen Bay Packers Fou…United Way of the Gre…Otto Bremer TrustThe Nordson Corporati…Rcu Foundation IncAnnmarie Foundation I…Greater Green Bay Com…Herbert H Kohl Charit…
Pablo Foundation IncWI79.8× affinity36 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pablo Foundation Inc · The Jamf Nation Global Foundation · Mayo Clinic Group Return · Xcel Energy Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · United Way of the Greater Chippewa Valley Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Rcu Foundation Inc · Annmarie Foundation Inc · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Eau Claire Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 29%
  • Southwest Florida Community Foundation Inc — 69% of income from government
  • Saving Grace — 48% of income from government
  • Hopeworks of Howard County Inc — 29% of income from government
  • Mass Insight Education and Research Institute Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Womens Foundation of Oregon — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
46report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 178 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines