Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pablo Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
67
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$833k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Philanthropy$3.8MArts & Culture$3.7MHealth$2.5MHuman Services$2.3MEducation$659kFood & Nutrition$629kHousing & Shelter$610kYouth Development$557kOther$0
02FY2024 · 67 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k38 grants · $86k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $416k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $971k
  • $250k+1 grant · $833k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$31M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAYO CLINIC$833,333
FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC$204,364
FRIENDS OF BEAVER CREEK RESERVE INC$150,000
CONFLUENCE COUNCIL INC$127,800
EAU CLAIRE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$107,143
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF EAU CLAIRE INC$100,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB GREATER CHIPPEWA$83,333
CITY OF EAU CLAIRE$75,000
EAU CLAIRE SOBER LIVING INC$73,000
LAKESHORE ELEMENTARY PTO INC$50,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC$45,000
WORLD RELIEF CORPORATION O NATIONAL$40,559
UW-EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION$40,000
CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF EAU CLAIRE INC$35,000
WESTERN DAIRYLAND ECONOMIC OPPORT$31,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $735k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EMBRACE SERVICES INC: $200k → 13%CHIPPEWA RIVER INDUSTRIES INC: $24k → 10%POSITIVE ALTERNATIVES: $2k → 11%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER INC: $20k → 10%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $2k → 10%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $1k → 10%THE COMMUNITY TABLE INC: $20k → 12%THE COMMUNITY TABLE INC: $15k → 12%THE COMMUNITY TABLE INC: $13k → 12%THE COMMUNITY TABLE INC: $9k → 12%THE COMMUNITY TABLE INC: $4k → 12%ST FRANCIS FOOD PANTRY: $3k → 12%ST FRANCIS FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 12%THE COMMUNITY TABLE INC: $2k → 12%THE COMMUNITY TABLE INC: $2k → 12%ST FRANCIS FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 12%THE COMMUNITY TABLE INC: $2k → 12%ST FRANCIS FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 12%THE COMMUNITY TABLE INC: $2k → 12%THE COMMUNITY TABLE INC: $2k → 12%THE COMMUNITY TABLE INC: $1k → 12%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $204k → 12%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $37k → 12%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $34k → 12%BOLTON REFUGE HOUSE INC: $25k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE: $25k → 12%BOLTON REFUGE HOUSE INC: $25k → 12%BOLTON REFUGE HOUSE INC: $17k → 12%YMCA OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY: $16k → 12%YMCA OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY: $15k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE: $4k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF THE CHIPPEWA VALL: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 52 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

52 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
43

Total granted

$12M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
0%

Still filing today

62%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $574k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CONFLUENCE COUNCIL INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $3.2M · revenue +77% · 48% of their budget
  • FM
    FEED MY PEOPLE INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $531k · revenue +18%
  • CV
    CHIPPEWA VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $355k · revenue +128% · 64% of their budget

Funded once

  • HV
    HOPE VILLAGE TINY HOUSING ALTERNATI
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
  • ES
    EMBRACE SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +12%
  • SH
    SACRED HEART FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $75k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eau Claire Area Chamber of Commerce

The eau claire area chamber of commerce, a not-for-profit business membership organization with steady membership around 1,200 members, is the advocate of business striving to enhance and protect the business environment and quality of…

—
2
Eau Claire Regional Arts Council Inc

The eau claire regional arts council promotes the appreciation, expression, and growth of the arts in the chippewa valley and strives to transform lives through performing and visual arts.

—
3
Eau Claire Area Economic Development Corporation

Advance economic prosperity through business and job growth. the eau claire area economic development corporation's purpose is to create and implement strategies to attract and grow businesses, investment, and talent to our service area.

—
4
Eau Claire County Housing Inc

Help provide safe, sanitary, and accessible dwelling accommodations for people of low and moderate incomes at rents and prices they can afford, and to help arrange the clearance, re-planning, and reconstruction of areas in which unsanitary…

Housing & Shelter
5
Eau Claire Area Convention and Visitors Bureau Inc

Visit eau claire is a community asset dedicated to creatively marketing, effectively managing, endlessly motivating and continously building a dynamic tourism economy of business, sports and leisure travelers. we amplify the image of our…

—
6
Central Wisconsin Community Action Council Inc

The mission of central wisconsin community action council, inc. (cwcac) is to provide opportunities for services which help low-income individuals and families within our service area achieve self-sufficiency and independence.

Human Services
7
Eau Claire Community Complex Inc

Eau claire community complex, inc. was formed to acquire, construct, own, and operate a multi-purpose events and recreation facility, making portions of it available to the university of wisconsin - eau claire and mayo clinic health system…

Community Improvement
8
Variety - the Children's Charity of Wisconsin Inc

Enriching the lives of children with physical or developmental special needs and their families.

—
9
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
10
The Arc Eau Claire Inc

To promote the general welfare of the mentally retarded and to foster development of programs and encourage research on their behalf.

Human Services
11
Waukesha County Community Foundation

Wccf is a pool of permanent endowment and project funds created primarily by and for the people of waukesha county to provide grant support to charitable organizations. the intent of the foundation is to serve a broad spectrum of the…

Philanthropy
12
Eau Claire Confluence Arts Inc

The corporation is responsible for developing and enacting all policies and procedures required to acquire and ensure the sustainable operation of an arts facility at the lowest reasonable cost for the benefit of community arts…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is LEau Claire Jazz Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyRecovery & Support ServicesEarly Childhood Care & Deve…Private Clubs and Sports Or…Diverse Community ServicesCommunity Health ServicesWisconsin Advocacy & Develo…Music and Theater Arts Educ…Professional & Hobby Associ…Food Assistance & Distribut…Chippewa Valley Community O…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%8%<5yr12%13%5–10yr17%24%10–20yr18%23%20–35yr16%21%35–55yr21%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%1%<5yr12%3%5–10yr17%40%10–20yr18%19%20–35yr16%16%35–55yr21%22%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/74
the rest of the field
12%
791/6,650

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 118 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

10
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/66
Grantees still filing
35/66
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PABLO CENTER — $4,505,000 · OtherPABLO CENTERFEED MY PEOPLE INC — $530,843 · OtherFEED MY PEOPLE INCCHIPPEWA VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $355,203 · OtherCHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $319,784 · Other+67 more — $2,026,546 · Other+67 moreCONFLUENCE COUNCIL INC — $3,152,541 · Arts & CultureCONFLUENCE COUNCIL INCCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF EAU CLAIRE INC — $135,000 · Arts & Culture+10 more — $108,000 · Arts & CultureMAYO CLINIC — $1,623,333 · HealthMAYO CLINICCHIPPEWA VALLEY HEALTH CLINIC INC — $324,876 · HealthCHIPPEWA VALLEY…VIVENT HEALTH INC — $100,000 · HealthEAU CLAIRE SOBER LIVING INC — $75,000 · Health+4 more — $82,673 · HealthEAU CLAIRE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $497,944 · PhilanthropyHOPE GOSPEL MISSION INC — $202,000 · PhilanthropyVISIT EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC — $52,000 · Philanthropy+4 more — $48,510 · PhilanthropyFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $275,620 · Human ServicesEMBRACE SERVICES INC — $200,000 · Human ServicesBOLTON REFUGE HOUSE INC — $88,386 · Human ServicesTHE COMMUNITY TABLE INC — $71,871 · Human ServicesCatholic Charities of the Diocese — $64,080 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY — $31,000 · Human Services+5 more — $60,697 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC — $257,920 · EducationWILDLANDS SCHOOL INC — $137,000 · EducationEAU CLAIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $102,000 · EducationLITERACY CHIPPEWA VALLEY — $55,035 · Education+2 more — $27,000 · EducationPOWER OF PERCEPTION INC — $151,600 · Youth DevelopmentTANDEM MENTORSHIP INC — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentBADGER BOYS STATE INCORPORATED — $10,000 · Youth Development
Other$7,737,376Arts & Culture$3,395,541Health$2,205,882Philanthropy$800,454Human Services$791,654Education$578,955Youth Development$191,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONFLUENCE COUNCIL INC — $3,152,541 over 6y, 48% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $1,623,333 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY PEOPLE INC — $530,843 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetEAU CLAIRE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $497,944 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetCHIPPEWA VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $355,203 over 2y, 64% of budgetCHIPPEWA VALLEY HEALTH CLINIC INC — $324,876 over 6y, 30% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $275,620 over 3y, 37% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC — $257,920 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE GOSPEL MISSION INC — $202,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetEMBRACE SERVICES INC — $200,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetPOWER OF PERCEPTION INC — $151,600 over 2y, 42% of budgetFRIENDS OF BEAVER CREEK RESERVE — $150,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetWILDLANDS SCHOOL INC — $137,000 over 4y, 74% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF EAU CLAIRE INC — $135,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetEAU CLAIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $102,000 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetVIVENT HEALTH INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOLTON REFUGE HOUSE INC — $88,386 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetEAU CLAIRE SOBER LIVING INC — $75,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY TABLE INC — $71,871 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetCatholic Charities of the Diocese — $64,080 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFIERCE FREEDOM INC — $61,461 over 5y, 14% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC — $61,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE REACH FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 over 1y, 72% of budgetLITERACY CHIPPEWA VALLEY — $55,035 over 6y, 5.4% of budgetVISIT EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC — $52,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetSCULPTURES EAU CLAIRE INC — $41,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY — $31,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTANDEM MENTORSHIP INC — $30,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetTRINITY EQUESTRIAN CENTER KIDS KAMP INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHIPPEWA RIVER INDUSTRIES INC — $24,116 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER — $23,096 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CHIPPEWA CO — $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFLYING EAGLES SKI CLUB INC — $20,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetEAU CLAIRE ASSOCIATION OF MUSEUMS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetTHE VILLAGE PROJECT INC — $17,000 over 2y, 73% of budgetCouncil on Foundations Inc — $13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJONAH INC — $11,200 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetSTAND IN THE LIGHT MEMORY CHOIR INC — $11,000 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEAU CLAIRE COMMUNITY PARKS ASSOC INC — $10,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetUW WAUSAU CAMPUS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetISLANDS OF BRILLIANCE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetST FRANCIS FOOD PANTRY INC — $8,985 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetEAU CLAIRE CHAMBER ORCHESTRA INC — $8,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetEVOLVING WELLNESS CORP — $7,673 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetEAU CLAIRE AREA HMONG MUTUAL ASSIST — $6,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC — $5,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONFLUENCE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds EAU CLAIRE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHIPPEWA VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHIPPEWA VALLEY HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE GOSPEL MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds EMBRACE SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds POWER OF PERCEPTION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BEAVER CREEK RESERVE ↗
  • Who funds WILDLANDS SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF EAU CLAIRE INC ↗
  • Who funds EAU CLAIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VIVENT HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds BOLTON REFUGE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds EAU CLAIRE SOBER LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of the Diocese ↗
  • Who funds FIERCE FREEDOM INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE REACH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY CHIPPEWA VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds VISIT EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SCULPTURES EAU CLAIRE INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eau Claire Community …The Jamf Nation Globa…Xcel Energy FoundationMayo Clinic Group Ret…Green Bay Packers Fou…Annmarie Foundation I…United Way of the Gre…Otto Bremer TrustMulthauf Foundation L…Ba Mason TrustRcu Foundation IncThe Nordson Corporati…
Eau Claire Community FoundationWI79.8× affinity36 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eau Claire Community Foundation · The Jamf Nation Global Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Mayo Clinic Group Return · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Annmarie Foundation Inc · United Way of the Greater Chippewa Valley Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Multhauf Foundation Ltd · Ba Mason Trust · Rcu Foundation Inc · The Nordson Corporation Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pablo Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    22report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pablo Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Pablo Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 118 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines