Skip to content
Plinth
Ask
← Funding

Washington · Nonprofit

SAGE ADVOCACY CENTER

SAGE ADVOCACY CENTER (Washington) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $279,373 to it, the largest being COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WASHINGTON ($134,507). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 51% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$1.7M
Revenue FY2025
10
Funders on record
$279k
Grants received
$586k
Net assets
5/10 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 4%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.4M) Expenses 100 ($1.3M) Net assets 100 ($498k)2018 Revenue 115 ($1.6M) Expenses 117 ($1.6M) Net assets 99 ($495k)2019 Revenue 118 ($1.6M) Expenses 117 ($1.6M) Net assets 107 ($531k)2020 Revenue 126 ($1.7M) Expenses 128 ($1.7M) Net assets 107 ($531k)2021 Revenue 113 ($1.5M) Expenses 121 ($1.6M) Net assets 91 ($452k)2022 Revenue 118 ($1.6M) Expenses 117 ($1.6M) Net assets 100 ($495k)2023 Revenue 129 ($1.8M) Expenses 116 ($1.6M) Net assets 140 ($694k)2024 Revenue 111 ($1.5M) Expenses 99 ($1.3M) Net assets 183 ($908k)2025 Revenue 128 ($1.7M) Expenses 144 ($1.9M) Net assets 118 ($586k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (128)Expenses (144)Net assets (118)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 82% · 2018 88% · 2019 86% · 2020 86% · 2021 93% · 2022 85% · 2023 92% · 2024 89% · 2025 92%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$21k
’17
−$3k
’18
$36k
’19
$208
’20
−$79k
’21
$44k
’22
$199k
’23
$177k
’24
−$182k
’25
0.2
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 4 funders to 2 funders, grant income rose $36k → $38k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
Numerica Credit Unionunclassified
$62k
Inatai Foundationunclassified
$15k
funders
4
2
3
3
6
4
2
3

3 of 10 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 51% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of SAGE ADVOCACY CENTER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 7 of 10 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SAGE ADVOCACY CENTER leans on a few funders — its largest provides 48% of grant income and the top three 83%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SAGE ADVOCACY CENTER.

48%
largest funder
83%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2019 57% · 2020 100% · 2021 57% · 2022 61% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

51% of SAGE ADVOCACY CENTER's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $137k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Washington funders.

WA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’19
’21
’22
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $142k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 10 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like SAGE ADVOCACY CENTER

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Domestic Violence Center of Grays Harbor84%Safeplace84%Domestic Abuse Women's Network83%Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County82%Emergency Support Shelter82%YWCA Pierce County81%Washington Coalition of Sexual Assault P81%Children's Advocacy Centers of Washington81%

Nationally

Domestic Violence Center of Grays Harbor84%Domestic and Sexual Violence Services of Carbon County84%Safeplace84%Saving Grace84%Women's Center Inc83%Sheltering Wings Center for Women Inc83%Victims of Violence Intervention83%Alliance Against Domestic Abuse83%
04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

90% of spending goes to programs.

Program 90%Management 9%Fundraising 0%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SAGE ADVOCACY CENTER: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SAGE ADVOCACY CENTER?
SAGE ADVOCACY CENTER (Washington) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $279,373 to it, the largest being COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WASHINGTON ($134,507). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 51% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does SAGE ADVOCACY CENTER have?
IRS filings report 10 organizations giving $279,373 in grants to SAGE ADVOCACY CENTER, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SAGE ADVOCACY CENTER?
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH CENTRAL WASHINGTON is the largest funder on record, with $134,507 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SAGE ADVOCACY CENTER find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 10funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing