· Private foundation
Helen Close Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $194k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SIERRA NEVADA JOURNEYS | $53,250 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA-RENO FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| SIERRA NEVADA JOURNEYS | $25,000 |
| THE EMPOWERMENT CENTER | $25,000 |
| EXPERIENCE EDUCATION DBA BRAIN HEALTH LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN NEVADA | $16,772 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,500 |
| CHANNEL 5 PUBLIC BROADCASTING | $10,000 |
| WALKER BASIS CONSERVANCY | $10,000 |
| CANINE REHABILITATION CENTER AND CAT SANCTUARY | $10,000 |
| CARE CHEST OF SIERRA NEVADA | $10,000 |
| LEAST RESISTANCE TRAINING CONCEPTS INC | $8,300 |
| GREAT BASIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| WESTERN NEVADA COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $413k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SNSIERRA NEVADA JOURNEYS8× · 2017–2024 · $443k · revenue +55%
- UOUniversity of Nevada Reno Foundation8× · 2017–2024 · $260k · revenue +35%
- HSHUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE7× · 2017–2024 · $120k · revenue +145%
Funded once
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesone grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +9%
- MVMASON VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTone grant, 2020 · $30k
- STSky Tavern Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +59%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide substance abuse prevention & treatment.
Wild horse protection, preservation, rescue and care work.
The Nevada Wildlife Federation is the Oldest 501(c)(3) statewide conservation organization dedicated to sustaining Nevada's wildlife through conservation and education.
CSNV is engaged in comprehensive community development projects that promote neighborhood revitalization and economic development, community education and civic action, housing, development; cultural awareness, equity and
Valley Humane Society (VHS) creates a brighter future for cats and dogs by encouraging and strengthening the bond between people and pets. VHS rescues and rehabilitates companion animals, champions responsible caretaking, shares pets'…
Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…
Nevada spca saves the lives of southern nevada's most vulnerable pets, inspires human companions to uphold the best possible care and increases the human-animal bond through adoption, foster and preventative care.
Our mission is to save, rehabilitate and rehome animals which may otherwise be euthanized at shelters due to their behavioural issues.
NVHC provides health services throughout the State of Nevada. Health services include OB/GYN, Pediatrics, Internal Medicine, Primary medical, Behavioral Health and dental care services. NVHC operates a mobile mammography clinic, two mobile…
Promote and facilitate the construction of housing for transitionally homeless men, women, and children
The organization supports Nevada local CASA programs which recruit, train, retain and deploy volunteers to advocate for abused or neglected children.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Cabinet Inc and the most unlike its peers is Boys and Girls Club of Mason Valley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SIERRA NEVADA JOURNEYS ↗
- Who funds University of Nevada Reno Foundation ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF TRUCKEE-TAHOE ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF THE SIERRA NEVADA INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEVADA DISCOVERY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE OF THE RANGE & THE AMERICAN MUSTANG ↗
- Who funds Community Foundation of Northern Nevada ↗
- Who funds TRUCKEE MEADOWS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE 1701 GROUP FKA ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF RENO-SPARKS ↗
- Who funds RIDGE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CARE CHEST OF SIERRA NEVADA ↗
- Who funds WESTERN NEVADA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE EMPOWERMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds GREAT BASIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHANNEL 5 PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC ↗
- Who funds Northern Nevada HIV Outpatient Program Education and Services ↗
- Who funds URBAN ROOTS GARDEN CLASSROOMS ↗
- Who funds LEAST RESISTANCE TRAINING CONCEPTS INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL RECREATION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Sky Tavern Inc ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NOTHERN NEVADA INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE TALK FOR TEENS ↗
- Who funds Douglas Animal Welfare Group ↗
- Who funds Quest Counseling & Consulting Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY RESPITE CARE OF NEVADA ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN NEVADA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds WALKER BASIN CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MASON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds Canine Rehabilitation Center and Cat Sanctuary ↗
- Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD'S CLOTHES CLOSET ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: NV Energy Charitable Foundation · The E L Cord Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · Dermody Properties Foundation · Thelma B & Thomas P Hart Foundation · The Nell J Redfield Foundation · Robert Z Hawkins Foundation · John Ben Snow Memorial Tr Uw #839158 · Renown Health · Tahoe Community Foundation · Peek Family Charitable Foundation · William N Pennington Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Helen Close Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Helen Close Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Helen Close Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.