Skip to content

Nevada · Nonprofit

THE HOLLAND PROJECT

THE HOLLAND PROJECT (Nevada) receives grants from 17 organizations whose IRS filings report $625,959 to it, the largest being The Nell J Redfield Foundation ($300,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$587k
Funders on record
17
Grants received
$626k
Net assets
$1.0M
7/17 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 27%
01What it does

What The Holland Project does

Mission

All age events (an average of 16 per month) reaching more than 10,000 youth (aged 13-26) in the truckee meadows. Events include live music, workshops and classes, gallery exhibits and art events, spoken word and poetry events, city-wide special events, film presentations, dance events, band recordings, forums and speaker presentations.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. All age events (an average of 16 per month) reaching more than 10,000 youth (aged 13-26) in the truckee meadows. Events include live music, workshops and classes, gallery exhibits and art events, spoken word and poetry events, city-wide special events, film presentations, dance events, band recordings, forums, and speaker presentations. Due to covid-19 crisis, organization had to pivot their programs to provide more education, workshop, speaking and discussion opportunities, virtual exhibitions and music, hybrid in-person/virtual camps and afterschool programs, community radio projects, blog series and publications, and spending more hours in community aid and volunteer service as a team.

    $516,484 spent$267,153 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $516,484.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($269k) Expenses 100 ($163k) Net assets 100 ($772k)2018 Revenue 73 ($196k) Expenses 148 ($241k) Net assets 94 ($727k)2019 Revenue 103 ($278k) Expenses 174 ($283k) Net assets 93 ($722k)2020 Revenue 101 ($272k) Expenses 167 ($272k) Net assets 93 ($722k)2021 Revenue 181 ($488k) Expenses 190 ($310k) Net assets 117 ($900k)2022 Revenue 204 ($550k) Expenses 233 ($379k) Net assets 139 ($1.1M)2023 Revenue 158 ($424k) Expenses 264 ($431k) Net assets 138 ($1.1M)2024 Revenue 198 ($533k) Expenses 359 ($586k) Net assets 131 ($1.0M)2025 Revenue 218 ($587k) Expenses 358 ($584k) Net assets 131 ($1.0M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (218)Expenses (358)Net assets (131)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $1.2M to $1.7M (+40%).

$772k
$727k
$722k
$757k
$1.0M
$1.2M
$1.2M
$1.7M
$1.7M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 10% · 2018 13% · 2019 8% · 2020 8% · 2021 22%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

53% of THE HOLLAND PROJECT’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (64% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 19,618 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$106k
’17
−$45k
’18
−$6k
’19
$99
’20
$178k
’21
$170k
’22
−$6k
’23
−$53k
’24
$3k
’25
17
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed12111110121281010
Joined·+4+0+1+2+0+1+5+0
No longer listed·50200530
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 8 funders, grant income rose $250 → $113k.

4 of 17 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 18% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THE HOLLAND PROJECT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE HOLLAND PROJECT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 48% of grant income and the top three 69%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

28% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE HOLLAND PROJECT.

48%
largest funder
69%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 83% · 2020 56% · 2021 57% · 2022 53% · 2023 40% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of THE HOLLAND PROJECT's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 41% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

87% of THE HOLLAND PROJECT's grant income comes from Nevada funders.

NY
NV
PA
CA
NC
AL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Nevada out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $115k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

THE HOLLAND PROJECT holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 12,262 arts & culture nonprofits its size.

Operating margin1% · below the median
Months of reserve16.8mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)10% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 12,262 arts & culture nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like THE HOLLAND PROJECT

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Nevada

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

88% of spending goes to programs.

Program 88%Management 12%Fundraising 0%

Governance

9
board members
0%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE HOLLAND PROJECT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE HOLLAND PROJECT?
THE HOLLAND PROJECT (Nevada) receives grants from 17 organizations whose IRS filings report $625,959 to it, the largest being The Nell J Redfield Foundation ($300,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does THE HOLLAND PROJECT have?
IRS filings report 17 organizations giving $625,959 in grants to THE HOLLAND PROJECT, 7 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE HOLLAND PROJECT?
The Nell J Redfield Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $300,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE HOLLAND PROJECT find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Nevada. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Holland Project →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 17 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing