· Public charity
Cwi Works Inc
Cwi works, inc was incorporated in 1962, as a not-for-profit organization.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 40% of CWI WORKS INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $29k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $2.4M
- $250k+38 grants · $33M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MOTIVATION EDUCATION AND TRAINING INC | $11,474,106 |
| CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC | $2,036,435 |
| WINSTON-SALEM URBAN LEAGUE | $1,228,513 |
| EAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE INC | $1,224,656 |
| COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS INC | $1,083,384 |
| MIDDLE ALABAMA AREA AGENCY ON AGING | $1,074,339 |
| NEW CURATIVE REHABILITATION INC | $873,018 |
| NATIONAL ABLE NETWORK | $810,941 |
| JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON | $704,382 |
| COUNTY OF ERIE DEPARTMENT OF SENIOR SERVICES-SUPPORTIVE SERVICES CORP | $699,298 |
| EAST TN HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY | $648,749 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF WORCESTER | $630,961 |
| THE URBAN LEAGUE OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY | $567,025 |
| NORTHERN INDIANA WORKFORCE BOARD | $535,721 |
| SOUTH CENTRAL HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY | $533,054 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $88.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
74 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $133k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MEMOTIVATION EDUCATION AND TRAINING8× · 2017–2025 · $55M · revenue +48%
- CPCHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC8× · 2017–2025 · $16M · revenue +162%
- ESEAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC8× · 2017–2025 · $12M · revenue +20%
Funded once
- CCCURATIVE CONNECTIONS INCone grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue -10%
- MPMERRILL PARK CIVIC ASSOC OF SPRINGFIELD GDNS INCone grant, 2024 · $520k · revenue +4% · 39% of their budget
- COCity of Oakland OPRYDone grant, 2017 · $500k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
In partnership with our community, capca is committed to educating eligible participants by providing quality services which empower lives, expand self-reliance and increase community involvement.
Empowering seniors to live with dignity and choice.
The western connecticut area agency on aging, inc. (wcaaa) develops, manages and provides comprehensive services through person centered planning for seniors, caregivers and individuals with disabilities in order to maintain their…
To provide quality services to low-income individuals and families, moving them toward self-sufficiency and improving their quality of life.
Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…
To partner with the community to eliminate poverty and create social change through advocacy and essential services.
Scbec builds capacity and ensures the long-term success of skilled employees, well run businesses, organizations, and life enriching senior nutrition and social/health activities, and public transportation services on the southern oregon…
The agency's mission is to advocate and provide services to enhance the quality of life for older adults.
To promote independent and meaningful living for older adults through direct services and programs in the home and community.
To respectfully assist people to achieve and sustain self-sufficiency through direct services, education, and community partnerships. the agency administers more than 50 different programs including head start, early head start, homeless…
Wci empowers individuals through employment and training services, helping people of all backgrounds including low-skilled and unskilled adults enter the workforce. we provide economically disadvantaged individuals and those facing…
Assist older adults in responding to their changing lifestyles and maximizing their independence through a variety of programs and services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Program Corporation of Washington-Morgan Counties Ohio and the most unlike its peers is Motivation Education and Training. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MOTIVATION EDUCATION AND TRAINING ↗
- Who funds CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds EAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Winston-Salem Urban League ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF WORCESTER ↗
- Who funds EAST TENNESSEE HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN MS PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH CENTRAL HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds MERITAN INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN INDIANA WORKFORCE BOARD INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds United Way of the Cape Fear Area Inc ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS FOR CITIZENS INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST TENNESSEE HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Fort Wayne - South Bend Inc ↗
- Who funds COASTLINE ELDERLY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds KANKAKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WORKFORCE RESOURCE INC ↗
- Who funds State of Franklin Health Council ↗
- Who funds Chattanooga Goodwill Industries Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds JAMAICA SERVICE PROGRAM FOR OLDER ADULTS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Usaging · Meals on Wheels America · National Council on Aging Inc · Center for Technology and Civic Life · Goodwill Industries International Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Cities for Financial Empowerment Fund Inc · Duluth-Superior Area Community Foundation · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cwi Works Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Coastline Elderly Services Inc — 58% of income from government
- Citizens for Citizens Inc — 41% of income from government
- Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
- Family and Children's Services of Centra — 10% of income from government
- Goodwill Industries of the Chesapeake Inc — 7% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.