Skip to content
Cwi Works Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Cwi Works Inc

Cwi works, inc was incorporated in 1962, as a not-for-profit organization.

$35M
Granted FY2025still arriving
52
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$11M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Employment$302MHuman Services$5.9M
02FY2025 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $29k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $2.4M
  • $250k+38 grants · $33M
$386,232
Median grant
12
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOTIVATION EDUCATION AND TRAINING INC$11,474,106
CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC$2,036,435
WINSTON-SALEM URBAN LEAGUE$1,228,513
EAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE INC$1,224,656
COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS INC$1,083,384
MIDDLE ALABAMA AREA AGENCY ON AGING$1,074,339
NEW CURATIVE REHABILITATION INC$873,018
NATIONAL ABLE NETWORK$810,941
JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON$704,382
COUNTY OF ERIE DEPARTMENT OF SENIOR SERVICES-SUPPORTIVE SERVICES CORP$699,298
EAST TN HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY$648,749
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF WORCESTER$630,961
THE URBAN LEAGUE OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY$567,025
NORTHERN INDIANA WORKFORCE BOARD$535,721
SOUTH CENTRAL HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY$533,054
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $88.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COASTLINE ELDERLY SERVICES INC: $623k → 11%EAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE INC: $1.7M → 11%THE URBAN LEAGUE OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY: $754k → 9%CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $2.3M → 17%FIRST TN HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY: $616k → 14%MERITAN INC: $981k → 17%WINSTON-SALEM URBAN LEAGUE: $1.7M → 15%CARITAS FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $750k → 15%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $940k → 8%EAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE INC: $1.7M → 11%THE URBAN LEAGUE OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY: $575k → 9%CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $2.2M → 17%FIRST TN HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY: $614k → 14%MERITAN INC: $718k → 17%WINSTON-SALEM URBAN LEAGUE: $1.6M → 15%CARITAS FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $749k → 15%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $761k → 8%EAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE INC: $1.6M → 11%CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $2.2M → 17%FIRST TN HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY: $587k → 14%MERITAN INC: $639k → 17%WINSTON-SALEM URBAN LEAGUE: $1.4M → 15%CARITAS FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $743k → 15%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $705k → 8%EAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE INC: $1.5M → 11%CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $2.0M → 17%MERITAN INC: $628k → 17%WINSTON-SALEM URBAN LEAGUE: $1.2M → 15%CARITAS FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $723k → 15%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $704k → 8%EAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE INC: $1.5M → 11%CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $2.0M → 17%MERITAN INC: $595k → 17%WINSTON-SALEM URBAN LEAGUE: $1.2M → 15%CARITAS FAMILY SOLUTIONS: $617k → 15%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $704k → 8%EAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE INC: $1.4M → 11%CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $1.8M → 17%WINSTON-SALEM URBAN LEAGUE: $1.2M → 15%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $693k → 8%EAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE INC: $1.4M → 11%CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $1.8M → 17%WINSTON-SALEM URBAN LEAGUE: $1.1M → 15%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $692k → 8%EAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICE INC: $1.2M → 11%CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $1.8M → 17%WINSTON-SALEM URBAN LEAGUE: $1.0M → 15%JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $685k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
CA
MD
NM
TN
NC
MS
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$302M · 74 repeat orgs$5.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

74 repeat relationships: 51 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

74
23

Total granted

$302M
$5.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+16%

Still filing today

55%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $133k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEmploymentCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ME
    MOTIVATION EDUCATION AND TRAINING
    8× · 2017–2025 · $55M · revenue +48%
  • CP
    CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $16M · revenue +162%
  • ES
    EAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $12M · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • CC
    CURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue -10%
  • MP
    MERRILL PARK CIVIC ASSOC OF SPRINGFIELD GDNS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $520k · revenue +4% · 39% of their budget
  • CO
    City of Oakland OPRYD
    one grant, 2017 · $500k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Action Program for Central Arkansas

In partnership with our community, capca is committed to educating eligible participants by providing quality services which empower lives, expand self-reliance and increase community involvement.

Human Services
2
The Capital Area Agency On Aging

Empowering seniors to live with dignity and choice.

Human Services
3
Western Connecticut Area Agency On Aging Inc

The western connecticut area agency on aging, inc. (wcaaa) develops, manages and provides comprehensive services through person centered planning for seniors, caregivers and individuals with disabilities in order to maintain their…

Human Services
4
Southwestern Community Action Council Inc

To provide quality services to low-income individuals and families, moving them toward self-sufficiency and improving their quality of life.

Human Services
5
Area Agency On Aging of Western Michigan Inc

Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…

Human Services
6
Community Action Board

To partner with the community to eliminate poverty and create social change through advocacy and essential services.

Employment
7
South Coast Business Employment Corporation

Scbec builds capacity and ensures the long-term success of skilled employees, well run businesses, organizations, and life enriching senior nutrition and social/health activities, and public transportation services on the southern oregon…

Employment
8
Capital Area Agency On Aging Inc

The agency's mission is to advocate and provide services to enhance the quality of life for older adults.

Human Services
9
Senior Community Services Inc

To promote independent and meaningful living for older adults through direct services and programs in the home and community.

Human Services
10
Cayugaseneca Community Action Agency Inc

To respectfully assist people to achieve and sustain self-sufficiency through direct services, education, and community partnerships. the agency administers more than 50 different programs including head start, early head start, homeless…

—
11
Workforce Connections Inc

Wci empowers individuals through employment and training services, helping people of all backgrounds including low-skilled and unskilled adults enter the workforce. we provide economically disadvantaged individuals and those facing…

Employment
12
Eastern Area Adult Services Inc

Assist older adults in responding to their changing lifestyles and maximizing their independence through a variety of programs and services.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Program Corporation of Washington-Morgan Counties Ohio; the most unlike its peers is Motivation Education and Training. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
57/61
Grantees still filing
45/61
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MIDDLE ALABAMA AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $8,886,727 · OtherMIDDLE ALABAMA AREA AGENCY ON AGINGNEW CURATIVE REHABILITATION INC: $7,765,356 · OtherNEW CURATIVE REHABILITATION INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF WORCESTER: $6,327,584 · OtherEAST TENNESSEE HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY INC: $6,102,345 · OtherCOUNTY OF ERIE DEPARTMENT OF SENIOR SERVICES-SUPPORTIVE SERVICES CORP: $6,012,857 · OtherSOUTHERN MS PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC: $5,468,224 · OtherSOUTH CENTRAL HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY INC: $5,294,488 · OtherTOP OF ALABAMA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS: $4,499,586 · OtherCATHOLIC BISHOP OF CHICAGO: $4,424,247 · Other+49 more: $69,954,179 · Other+49 moreCHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $16,237,650 · Human ServicesCHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCI…EAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC: $12,069,690 · Human ServicesEAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES …Winston-Salem Urban League: $10,380,226 · Human ServicesWinston-Salem Urban LeagueJEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $5,882,512 · Human ServicesJEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF …MERITAN INC: $5,224,744 · Human ServicesMERITAN INCCHRISTIAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $4,639,253 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE OF WESTCHESTER INC: $4,595,054 · Human ServicesFIRST TENNESSEE HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY: $4,260,065 · Human ServicesCatholic Charities of the Diocese of Fort Wayne - South Bend Inc: $4,046,956 · Human ServicesCOASTLINE ELDERLY SERVICES INC: $3,939,173 · Human ServicesBLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $3,715,688 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $3,148,598 · Human Services+13 more: $10,778,912 · Human Services+13 moreMOTIVATION EDUCATION AND TRAINING: $54,815,989 · EmploymentMOTIVATION EDUCATION AND TRA…COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS: $8,523,229 · EmploymentCOMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM…NORTHERN INDIANA WORKFORCE BOARD INC: $4,904,692 · EmploymentNORTHERN INDIANA WORKFORCE B…WORKFORCE RESOURCE INC: $3,446,707 · EmploymentChattanooga Goodwill Industries Inc: $3,222,811 · Employment+3 more: $1,891,532 · EmploymentCITIZENS FOR CITIZENS INC: $4,357,835 · Community ImprovementKANKAKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $3,593,275 · Community ImprovementWEST ALABAMA REGIONAL COMMISSION: $1,984,660 · Community ImprovementCENTRALINA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COM: $1,882,812 · Community ImprovementURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER CHATTANOOGA: $938,086 · Community ImprovementUnited Way of the Cape Fear Area Inc: $4,494,487 · PhilanthropyPathpoint: $473,572 · Education
Other$124,735,593Human Services$88,918,521Employment$76,804,960Community Improvement$12,756,668Philanthropy$4,494,487Education$473,572

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOTIVATION EDUCATION AND TRAINING: $54,815,989 over 8y, 23% of budgetCHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $16,237,650 over 8y, 6.7% of budgetEAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC: $12,069,690 over 8y, 21% of budgetWinston-Salem Urban League: $10,380,226 over 8y, 81% of budgetCOMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS: $8,523,229 over 8y, 30% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF WORCESTER: $6,327,584 over 8y, 8.1% of budgetEAST TENNESSEE HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY INC: $6,102,345 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetJEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $5,882,512 over 8y, 18% of budgetSOUTHERN MS PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC: $5,468,224 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY INC: $5,294,488 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetMERITAN INC: $5,224,744 over 8y, 5.6% of budgetNORTHERN INDIANA WORKFORCE BOARD INC: $4,904,692 over 8y, 11% of budgetCHRISTIAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS: $4,639,253 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF WESTCHESTER INC: $4,595,054 over 8y, 13% of budgetUnited Way of the Cape Fear Area Inc: $4,494,487 over 8y, 27% of budgetCITIZENS FOR CITIZENS INC: $4,357,835 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetFIRST TENNESSEE HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY: $4,260,065 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetCatholic Charities of the Diocese of Fort Wayne - South Bend Inc: $4,046,956 over 8y, 14% of budgetCOASTLINE ELDERLY SERVICES INC: $3,939,173 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetBLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $3,715,688 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetKANKAKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $3,593,275 over 8y, 9.0% of budgetWORKFORCE RESOURCE INC: $3,446,707 over 6y, 9.5% of budgetState of Franklin Health Council: $3,259,662 over 8y, 45% of budgetChattanooga Goodwill Industries Inc: $3,222,811 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $3,148,598 over 7y, 6.2% of budgetJAMAICA SERVICE PROGRAM FOR OLDER ADULTS INC: $2,799,943 over 6y, 15% of budgetNorthwest TN Human Resource Agency: $2,310,936 over 8y, 4.4% of budgetELDER SERVICES OF CAPE COD AND THE ISLANDS INC: $2,295,303 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetPRO ACTION OF STEUBEN AND YATES INC: $2,244,836 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetWEST ALABAMA REGIONAL COMMISSION: $1,984,660 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetCENTRALINA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COM: $1,882,812 over 5y, 73% of budgetEAST CENTRAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC: $1,629,586 over 8y, 3.3% of budgetNATIONAL ABLE NETWORK INC: $1,580,306 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetMAC INCORPORATED: $1,394,481 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetWEST CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION: $1,366,347 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetNATIONAL INDIAN COUNCIL ON AGING: $1,273,285 over 2y, 12% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF WESTERN NEW YORK: $1,034,215 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCURATIVE CONNECTIONS INC: $1,023,421 over 1y, 14% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER CHATTANOOGA: $938,086 over 2y, 17% of budgetARROWHEAD ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY AGENCY INCORPORATED: $873,257 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SIOUXLAND: $864,955 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetCENTRAL MINNESOTA JOBS AND TRAINING SERVICES INC: $793,430 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE CHESAPEAKE INC: $728,982 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCWI LABS INC: $721,750 over 2y, 20% of budgetBRIDGES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $649,060 over 2y, 47% of budgetMERRILL PARK CIVIC ASSOC OF SPRINGFIELD GDNS INC: $520,439 over 1y, 39% of budgetPathpoint: $473,572 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF CENTRA: $428,666 over 1y, 6.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOTIVATION EDUCATION AND TRAINING ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Winston-Salem Urban League ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF WORCESTER ↗
  • Who funds EAST TENNESSEE HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COUNCIL FOR THE AGING OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN MS PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH CENTRAL HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds MERITAN INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN INDIANA WORKFORCE BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds United Way of the Cape Fear Area Inc ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS FOR CITIZENS INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST TENNESSEE HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Fort Wayne - South Bend Inc ↗
  • Who funds COASTLINE ELDERLY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds KANKAKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds WORKFORCE RESOURCE INC ↗
  • Who funds State of Franklin Health Council ↗
  • Who funds Chattanooga Goodwill Industries Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds JAMAICA SERVICE PROGRAM FOR OLDER ADULTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

UsagingMeals on Wheels Ameri…National Council on A…Center for Technology…Goodwill Industries I…Otto Bremer TrustCities for Financial …Duluth-Superior Area …Rockland Trust Charit…Baltimore Community F…National Fish and Wil…Eastern Bank Foundati…
UsagingDC25.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Usaging · Meals on Wheels America · National Council on Aging Inc · Center for Technology and Civic Life · Goodwill Industries International Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Cities for Financial Empowerment Fund Inc · Duluth-Superior Area Community Foundation · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cwi Works Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cwi Works Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Coastline Elderly Services Inc: 58% of income from government
  • Citizens for Citizens Inc: 41% of income from government
  • Associated Catholic Charities Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Family and Children's Services of Centra: 10% of income from government
  • Goodwill Industries of the Chesapeake Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 98 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cwi Works’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home