Skip to content
Coypu Foundation Trust Xxxxx3002 at a glance

· Private foundation

Coypu Foundation Trust Xxxxx3002

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$934k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$99k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$2.0MEducation$1.8MAnimals$1.7MScience & Tech$100kCommunity Improvement$95kArts & Culture$49kYouth Development$25kRecreation & Sports$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $314k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $615k
$48,680
Median grant
11
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LSU FOUNDATION$98,500
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION$70,000
WATER INSTITUTE OF THE GULF$70,000
NICHOLIS STATE UNIVERSITY$64,837
COALITION TO RESTORE COASTAL$61,425
FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$50,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$50,000
PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION$50,000
AUDUBON NATURE INSTITUTE$50,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIRD OBSERVATORY$50,000
THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION$48,680
PONTCHARTRAIN CONSERVANCY$45,000
COMMON GROUND RELIEF$44,925
CHIMP HAVEN$40,211
BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $65k → 17%Wildlife Conservation Society: $50k → 28%PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $50k → 17%SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $50k → 14%AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $50k → 15%INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION: $50k → 9%ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIRD OBSERVATORY: $50k → 10%MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $50k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTHERN: $78k → 22%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $125k → 7%WOODLANDS CONSERVANCY: $50k → 16%Nicholls State University: $80k → 17%LSU FOUNDATION: $101k → 19%COMMON GROUND RELIEF: $63k → 23%NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $65k → 17%PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%SOUTHWEST RESEARCH: $50k → 14%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100k → 7%NICHOLIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $71k → 17%LSU FOUNDATION: $99k → 19%COMMON GROUND RELIEF: $62k → 23%NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $60k → 17%PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $50k → 14%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100k → 7%NICHOLIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $65k → 17%WATER INSTITUTE OF THE GULF: $70k → 19%COMMON GROUND RELIEF: $51k → 23%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $100k → 7%NICHOLIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $58k → 17%LSU FOUNDATION: $52k → 19%LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN BASIN FOUNDATION: $68k → 23%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $75k → 7%NICHOLIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $55k → 17%The Nature Conservancy: $50k → 7%THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $50k → 7%Louisiana State University Foundation: $89k → 19%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $84k → 23%COALITION TO RESTORE COASTAL: $61k → 19%AUDUBON NATURE INSTITUTE: $63k → 23%COALITION TO RESTORE COASTAL: $50k → 19%AUDUBON NATURE INSTITUTE: $50k → 23%COALITION TO RESTORE COASTAL: $50k → 19%COALITION TO RESTORE COASTAL: $49k → 19%LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND: $55k → 19%LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND: $50k → 19%LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND: $50k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
CA
UT
CO
VA
TN
NC
DC
LA
MS
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 25 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
25

Total granted

$4.1M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+14%

Still filing today

72%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $204k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentAnimalsEducationRecreation & SportsPublic Safety & DisasterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LSU FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $319k · revenue +67%
  • AN
    Audubon Nature Institute Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $281k · revenue +78%
  • CG
    COMMON GROUND RELIEF INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $222k · revenue +114% · 39% of their budget

Funded once

  • LS
    Louisiana State University Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · $89k
  • TA
    THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $84k · revenue +8%
  • NS
    Nicholls State University
    one grant, 2017 · $80k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
The Houston Audubon Society

To advance the conservation of birds and their habitats in the Greater Houston Gulf Coast region by acquiring and maintaining critical habitat as bird sanctuaries, providing education programs and nature experiences, and advocating policy…

Environment
4
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
5
Tucson Audubon Society

Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.

Animals
6
Houston Zoo Inc

Mission: Connect communities with animals, inspiring action to save wildlife. Vision: Be a leader in the global movement to save wildlife. (Continued on Schedule O) Houston Zoo, Inc. (HZI) strives to be a zoo that practices exemplary…

Animals
7
Wetlands America Trust Inc

Wetlands america trust, inc. is a nonprofit organization formed in 1985 to expand ducks unlimited, inc's mission to provide leadership in the protection of the natural balance of wetlands ecosystems ensuring the future viability of…

Environment
8
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.

Animals
9
Tennessee Aquarium

The mission of the Tennessee Aquarium is to connect people with nature and empower them to make informed decisions about water and wildlife.

Animals
10
California Institute of Environmental Studies

The institute is dedicated to scientific research, the results of which are used to promote public awareness and education in the areas of conservation biology and ecology,including the wise use of natural resources.

Animals
11
South Carolina Aquarium

Our mission is to inspire conservation of the natural world by exhibiting and caring for animals, by excelling in education and research, and by providing an exceptional visitor experience.

Animals
12
Int'l Union for Conservation of Nature & Natural Resources - Us

Iucn-us fund builds bridges between us donors and iucn by catalyzing, accelerating, funding and promoting iucn's work - conserving nature and natural resources in the united states and throughout the world.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Earth Conservation; the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
27/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $600,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $390,000 · OtherNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATIONUNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $361,297 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE ALUMNI ASSOCIATIONNICHOLIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $289,964 · OtherNICHOLIS STATE UNIVERSITYCOALITION TO RESTORE COASTAL: $210,639 · OtherCOALITION TO RESTORE COASTALNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC: $190,000 · OtherNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INCLOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND: $154,995 · OtherBAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL: $114,697 · OtherFISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $111,800 · Other+17 more: $811,395 · Other+17 moreAudubon Nature Institute Inc: $280,548 · AnimalsAudubon Nature I…CHIMP HAVEN INC: $140,224 · AnimalsCHIMP HAVEN INCAmerican Bird Conservancy: $129,000 · AnimalsAmerican Bird Co…MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 · AnimalsMORRIS ANIMAL FO…INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL CR…ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIRD OBSERVATORY: $50,000 · AnimalsROCKY MOUNTAIN B…Wildlife Conservation Society: $50,000 · AnimalsWildlife Conserv…SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $46,469 · AnimalsDefenders of Wildlife: $45,000 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF BATON ROUGE ZOO: $37,500 · AnimalsPONTCHARTRAIN CONSERVANCY: $198,589 · EnvironmentPONTCHARTRAIN C…PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $175,000 · EnvironmentPARKS AND WILDL…Southwings Inc: $99,224 · EnvironmentSouthwings IncHill Country Alliance: $79,000 · EnvironmentHill Country Al…THE WATER INSTITUTE OF THE GULF: $70,000 · EnvironmentTHE WATER INSTI…Ducks Unlimited Inc: $61,333 · EnvironmentDucks Unlimited…THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION: $48,680 · EnvironmentTHE AMERICAN CH…+5 more: $90,000 · Environment+5 moreLSU FOUNDATION: $319,381 · EducationLSU FOUNDAT…University of Idaho Foundation Inc: $119,000 · EducationUniversity …THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $84,160 · EducationTHE ADMINIS…AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $49,822 · EducationAUBURN UNIV…+1 more: $5,000 · EducationCOMMON GROUND RELIEF INC: $221,815 · Public Safety & DisasterWOODLANDS CONSERVANCY: $85,000 · Recreation & SportsLafayette Central Park Inc: $12,000 · Recreation & SportsFriends of Lafitte Corridor Inc: $91,000 · Community Improvement
Other$3,234,787Animals$878,741Environment$821,826Education$577,363Public Safety & Disaster$221,815Recreation & Sports$97,000Community Improvement$91,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $600,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $361,297 over 4y, 27% of budgetLSU FOUNDATION: $319,381 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAudubon Nature Institute Inc: $280,548 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMON GROUND RELIEF INC: $221,815 over 4y, 39% of budgetPONTCHARTRAIN CONSERVANCY: $198,589 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetPARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS: $175,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCHIMP HAVEN INC: $140,224 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican Bird Conservancy: $129,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Idaho Foundation Inc: $119,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL: $114,697 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSouthwings Inc: $99,224 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetFriends of Lafitte Corridor Inc: $91,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetWOODLANDS CONSERVANCY: $85,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $84,160 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHill Country Alliance: $79,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetTHE PEREGRINE FUND INC: $65,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $61,333 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN BIRD OBSERVATORY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $49,822 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION: $48,680 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $46,469 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF BATON ROUGE ZOO: $37,500 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetSEACOLOGY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTEXAS WATER TRADE: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTeaching Responsible Earth Education TREE: $25,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetOcean Alliance Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLafayette Central Park Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetONE EARTH CONSERVATION: $10,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTHE LENS: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LSU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Audubon Nature Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMON GROUND RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds PONTCHARTRAIN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds CHIMP HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds American Bird Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds University of Idaho Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Southwings Inc ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Lafitte Corridor Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOODLANDS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds Hill Country Alliance ↗
  • Who funds THE WATER INSTITUTE OF THE GULF ↗
  • Who funds THE PEREGRINE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIRD OBSERVATORY ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
  • Who funds AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater New Orlea…Shell USA Company Fou…National Fish and Wil…Freeman-Woollam Found…Apache FoundationKeller Family Foundat…Foundation for Louisi…PatagoniaorgJpmorgan Chase Founda…Vanguard Charitable E…Morgan Stanley Global…Network for Good
The Greater New Orleans FoundationLA21.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Freeman-Woollam Foundation · Apache Foundation · Keller Family Foundation · Foundation for Louisiana · Patagoniaorg · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Coypu Foundation Trust Xxxxx3002 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Coypu Foundation Trust Xxxxx3002. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Coypu Foundation Trust Xxxxx3002?

    Find your warmest path to Coypu Foundation Trust Xxxxx3002 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Coypu Foundation Trust Xxxxx3002’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home