· Private foundation
Coypu Foundation Trust Xxxxx3002
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $314k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $615k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LSU FOUNDATION | $98,500 |
| WATER INSTITUTE OF THE GULF | $70,000 |
| NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION | $70,000 |
| NICHOLIS STATE UNIVERSITY | $64,837 |
| COALITION TO RESTORE COASTAL | $61,425 |
| PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $50,000 |
| ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIRD OBSERVATORY | $50,000 |
| AUDUBON NATURE INSTITUTE | $50,000 |
| FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION | $48,680 |
| PONTCHARTRAIN CONSERVANCY | $45,000 |
| COMMON GROUND RELIEF | $44,925 |
| CHIMP HAVEN | $40,211 |
| BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $204k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LFLSU FOUNDATION5× · 2021–2025 · $319k · revenue +67%
- ANAudubon Nature Institute Inc7× · 2017–2025 · $281k · revenue +78%
- CGCOMMON GROUND RELIEF INC4× · 2020–2025 · $222k · revenue +114% · 39% of their budget
Funded once
- LSLouisiana State University Foundationone grant, 2017 · $89k
- TATHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUNDone grant, 2024 · $84k · revenue +8%
- NSNicholls State Universityone grant, 2017 · $80k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
To advance the conservation of birds and their habitats in the Greater Houston Gulf Coast region by acquiring and maintaining critical habitat as bird sanctuaries, providing education programs and nature experiences, and advocating policy…
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.
Mission: Connect communities with animals, inspiring action to save wildlife. Vision: Be a leader in the global movement to save wildlife. (Continued on Schedule O) Houston Zoo, Inc. (HZI) strives to be a zoo that practices exemplary…
Wetlands america trust, inc. is a nonprofit organization formed in 1985 to expand ducks unlimited, inc's mission to provide leadership in the protection of the natural balance of wetlands ecosystems ensuring the future viability of…
Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.
The mission of the Tennessee Aquarium is to connect people with nature and empower them to make informed decisions about water and wildlife.
The institute is dedicated to scientific research, the results of which are used to promote public awareness and education in the areas of conservation biology and ecology,including the wise use of natural resources.
Our mission is to inspire conservation of the natural world by exhibiting and caring for animals, by excelling in education and research, and by providing an exceptional visitor experience.
Iucn-us fund builds bridges between us donors and iucn by catalyzing, accelerating, funding and promoting iucn's work - conserving nature and natural resources in the united states and throughout the world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Earth Conservation and the most unlike its peers is Wildlife Conservation Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA LAFAYETTE ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds LSU FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Audubon Nature Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMON GROUND RELIEF INC ↗
- Who funds PONTCHARTRAIN CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds PARKS AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION OF TEXAS ↗
- Who funds CHIMP HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds American Bird Conservancy ↗
- Who funds University of Idaho Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BAT CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Southwings Inc ↗
- Who funds Friends of Lafitte Corridor Inc ↗
- Who funds WOODLANDS CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds Hill Country Alliance ↗
- Who funds THE WATER INSTITUTE OF THE GULF ↗
- Who funds THE PEREGRINE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRANE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN BIRD OBSERVATORY ↗
- Who funds AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN CHESTNUT FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Freeman-Woollam Foundation · Apache Foundation · Keller Family Foundation · Foundation for Louisiana · Patagoniaorg · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Coypu Foundation Trust Xxxxx3002 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Coypu Foundation Trust Xxxxx3002?
Find your warmest path to Coypu Foundation Trust Xxxxx3002 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.