Skip to content
Corvallis Neighborhood Housing Services Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Corvallis Neighborhood Housing Services Inc

To grow vibrant northwest communities by empowering the region's individuals, families, small businesses, and neighborhoods by opening doors to financial opportunity.

$3.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$71k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$329kHuman Services$264kHousing & Shelter$230kReligion$218kEmployment$180kCommunity Improvement$155kEducation$106kScience & Tech$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $347,549, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,078,941 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,731,392 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $203k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $123k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$76M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LINN BENTON LINCOLN HEALTH EQUITY ALLIANCE$71,068
ECUMENICAL MINISTRIES OF OREGON$51,554
CLACKAMAS EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT$48,398
MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY$21,609
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF LANE AND SOUTH COAST COUNTIES$20,250
LINGUISTICS GLOBAL ASSOCIATES$17,195
KLAMATH HOUSING AUTHORITY$15,075
ECHO MOUNTAIN FIRE RELIEF$15,000
CASCADE PACIFIC RC&D INC$15,000
CORVALLIS MULTICULTURAL LITERACY CENTER$10,000
STRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIES$10,000
YOUNG ROOTS OREGON$10,000
OLALLA CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES$10,000
CORVALLIS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER$10,000
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF JACKSON COUNTY$9,950
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $228k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEIGHBOR IMPACT: $26k → 10%NEIGHBOR IMPACT: $26k → 10%CASA LATINOS UNIDOS OF BENTON: $23k → 18%CASA LATINOS UNIDOS OF BENTON: $22k → 18%OLD MILL CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND: $16k → 18%OLD MILL CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND: $7k → 18%OLD MILL CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND: $7k → 18%DISABILITY EQUITY CENTER: $12k → 18%COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $8k → 18%VINA MOSES CENTER: $8k → 18%COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $7k → 18%STRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIES: $23k → 18%STRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIES: $13k → 18%STRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIES: $12k → 18%STRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIES: $12k → 18%STRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIES: $10k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 23 repeat orgs$376k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against -27% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
5

Total granted

$1.2M
$196k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
-27%

Still filing today

61%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $179k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementEmploymentHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    Cascade Pacific RC&D Area
    3× · 2022–2024 · $84k · revenue +25%
  • SR
    STRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIES
    5× · 2019–2024 · $69k · revenue +214%
  • GI
    GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF LANE AND SOUTH COAST COUNTIES INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $69k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • FH
    FARMWORKER HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2023 · $151k · revenue -43%
  • CP
    CORVALLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $16k · revenue -5%
  • UA
    Upstream Access
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ashland Works

Local Innovation Works supports recovery and resilience in Southern Oregon by supporting and training emerging leaders in values-aligned community organizations. It also hosts public conversations on topics related to the long term…

Community Improvement
2
Welcome Home Coalition

Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…

Community Improvement
3
Centro Cultural of Washington County

Centro cultural promotes education and economic development, increases cultural consciousness, responds to community needs and celebrates understanding among the diverse groups in our community.

—
4
Oregon Human Development Corporation

To promote economic and social advancement of farmworkers and disadvantaged individuals through the provision of education, training, advocacy and services that enhance self-sufficiency.

Human Services
5
Better Together Central Oregon

Our mission is to improve educational outcomes for children and youth from cradle to career in Central Oregon. They do this by fostering cross-sector collaboration bringing together partners from education, business, health, philanthropy,…

Human Services
6
The Campbell Institute

Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.

Unclassified
7
Team for Economic Action in Molalla

To build and maintain strong, diverse business districts; to create and retain living wage jobs; and to promote Molalla as a rewarding place to work, live, invest, and shop.

Community Improvement
8
Urban League of Portland Inc

To help empower african americans and others achieve equality in education, employment, and economic security.

Human Services
9
Cultivate Initiatives

The organization collectively works alongside those on the margins to empower individuals and communities through an inclusive range of services and support in east portland.

Housing & Shelter
10
Oregon Energy Systems Technology and Research
Environment
11
Rogue Farm Corps Dba Oregon Farm Corps

Oregon farm corps trains and equips the next generation of regenerative farmers and rancers through hands-on skill building, education, and business support.

Environment
12
Community and Shelter Assistance Corp

Rooted in its service to farmworkers, casa of oregon improves the lives of oregonians in underserved communities through building affordable housing, neighborhood facilities and programs that increase families' financial security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid Willamette Valley Community Action Agency; the most unlike its peers is Corvallis Daytime Drop-in Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ECUMENICAL MINISTRIES OF OREGON: $217,586 · OtherECUMENICAL MINISTRIES OF OREGONOREGON EDUCATION ASSOCIATION: $111,463 · OtherOREGON EDUCATION ASSOCIATIONOREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $58,850 · OtherOREGON STATE UNIVERSITYOLALLA CENTER: $55,500 · OtherOLALLA CENTERCLACKAMAS EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRIC: $48,398 · OtherCLACKAMAS EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICKLAMATH HOUSING AUTHORITY: $43,950 · OtherKLAMATH HOUSING AUTHORITYACCESS: $41,625 · OtherSouth Central Oregon Economic Development District: $32,850 · OtherGARFIELD ELEMENTARY PARENT TEACHER: $29,450 · Other+9 more: $155,182 · Other+9 moreSTRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIES: $68,950 · Human ServicesSTRENGTHENING RU…NEIGHBORIMPACT: $51,600 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORIMPACTCASA LATINOS UNIDOS DE BENTON COUNTY: $44,800 · Human ServicesCASA LATINOS UNI…OLD MILL CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $29,000 · Human ServicesOLD MILL CENTER …COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $14,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY OUTREA…Upstream Access: $12,000 · Human Services+1 more: $7,500 · Human ServicesLINN BENTON LINCOLN HEALTH EQUITY ALLIANCE: $71,068 · HealthLINN BENTON…PARROTT CREEK CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $67,000 · HealthPARROTT CRE…CORVALLIS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER: $22,000 · HealthCORVALLIS D…FARMWORKER HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $150,931 · Housing & ShelterFARMWORKER …Cascade Pacific RC&D Area: $84,038 · Community ImprovementCascade P…Corvallis Multicultural Literacy Center: $36,000 · Community ImprovementCorvallis…COMMUNITY LENDINGWORKS: $10,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY…GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF LANE AND SOUTH COAST COUNTIES INC: $68,550 · EmploymentCORVALLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $16,000 · Philanthropy
Other$794,854Human Services$228,350Health$160,068Housing & Shelter$150,931Community Improvement$130,038Employment$68,550Philanthropy$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFARMWORKER HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $150,931 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCascade Pacific RC&D Area: $84,038 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSTRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIES: $68,950 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF LANE AND SOUTH COAST COUNTIES INC: $68,550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARROTT CREEK CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $67,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetOLALLA CENTER: $55,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetNEIGHBORIMPACT: $51,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCASA LATINOS UNIDOS DE BENTON COUNTY: $44,800 over 2y, 11% of budgetACCESS: $41,625 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCorvallis Multicultural Literacy Center: $36,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetOLD MILL CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $29,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG ROOTS OREGON: $26,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCORVALLIS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER: $22,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetMID WILLAMETTE VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $21,609 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Oregon Inc: $18,225 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCORVALLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetECHO MOUNTAIN FIRE RELIEF: $15,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCOMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $14,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOregon Farmers Markets Association: $13,903 over 2y, 22% of budgetUpstream Access: $12,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetVINA MOSES WELFARE CENTER INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …Meyer Memorial TrustThe Ford Family Found…The Collins FoundationBenton Community Foun…The Autzen FoundationOCF Joseph E Weston P…Intercommunity Health…Juan Young TrustThe Roundhouse Founda…United Way of Benton …Good Samaritan Hospit…
The Oregon Community FoundationOR42.5× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Ford Family Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Benton Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Intercommunity Health Plans Inc · Juan Young Trust · The Roundhouse Foundation · United Way of Benton & Lincoln Counties · Good Samaritan Hospital Corvallis

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Corvallis Neighborhood Housing Services Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Corvallis Neighborhood Housing Services Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 38%
  • Oregon Farmers Markets Association: 90% of income from government
  • Mid Willamette Valley Community Action Agency: 81% of income from government
  • Neighborimpact: 68% of income from government
  • Access: 65% of income from government
  • Upstream Access: 53% of income from government
  • Strengthening Rural Families: 43% of income from government
  • Community Lendingworks: 43% of income from government
  • Old Mill Center for Children and Families Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Corvallis Multicultural Literacy Center: 37% of income from government
  • Casa Latinos Unidos De Benton County: 36% of income from government
  • Young Roots Oregon: 21% of income from government
  • Parrott Creek Child and Family Services: 20% of income from government
  • Corvallis Daytime Drop-in Center: 8% of income from government
  • Community Outreach Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Farmworker Housing Development Corporation: 7% of income from government
  • Goodwill Industries of Lane and South Coast Counties Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Corvallis Neighborhood Housing Services’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home