Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Corvallis Neighborhood Housing Services Inc

To grow vibrant northwest communities by empowering the region's individuals, families, small businesses, and neighborhoods by opening doors to financial opportunity.

$3.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$71k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of CORVALLIS NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 17 grants below total $347,549 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,078,941 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,731,392 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $203k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $123k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$76M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LINN BENTON LINCOLN HEALTH EQUITY ALLIANCE$71,068
ECUMENICAL MINISTRIES OF OREGON$51,554
CLACKAMAS EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT$48,398
MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY$21,609
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF LANE AND SOUTH COAST COUNTIES$20,250
LINGUISTICS GLOBAL ASSOCIATES$17,195
KLAMATH HOUSING AUTHORITY$15,075
ECHO MOUNTAIN FIRE RELIEF$15,000
CASCADE PACIFIC RC&D INC$15,000
CORVALLIS MULTICULTURAL LITERACY CENTER$10,000
STRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIES$10,000
YOUNG ROOTS OREGON$10,000
OLALLA CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES$10,000
CORVALLIS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER$10,000
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF JACKSON COUNTY$9,950
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $228k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEIGHBOR IMPACT: $26k → 10%NEIGHBOR IMPACT: $26k → 10%CASA LATINOS UNIDOS OF BENTON: $23k → 18%CASA LATINOS UNIDOS OF BENTON: $22k → 18%OLD MILL CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND: $16k → 18%OLD MILL CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND: $7k → 18%OLD MILL CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND: $7k → 18%DISABILITY EQUITY CENTER: $12k → 18%COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $8k → 18%VINA MOSES CENTER: $8k → 18%COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $7k → 18%STRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIES: $23k → 18%STRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIES: $13k → 18%STRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIES: $12k → 18%STRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIES: $12k → 18%STRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIES: $10k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 23 repeat orgs$376k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against -27% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
5

Total granted

$1.2M
$196k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
-27%

Still filing today

61%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $179k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementEmploymentHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    Cascade Pacific RC&D Area
    3× · 2022–2024 · $84k · revenue +25%
  • SR
    STRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIES
    5× · 2019–2024 · $69k · revenue +214%
  • GI
    GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF LANE AND SOUTH COAST COUNTIES INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $69k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • FH
    FARMWORKER HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2023 · $151k · revenue -43%
  • CP
    CORVALLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $16k · revenue -5%
  • UA
    Upstream Access
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue +12%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ashland Works

Local Innovation Works supports recovery and resilience in Southern Oregon by supporting and training emerging leaders in values-aligned community organizations. It also hosts public conversations on topics related to the long term…

Community Improvement
2
Welcome Home Coalition

Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…

Community Improvement
3
Centro Cultural of Washington County

Centro cultural promotes education and economic development, increases cultural consciousness, responds to community needs and celebrates understanding among the diverse groups in our community.

4
Better Together Central Oregon

Our mission is to improve educational outcomes for children and youth from cradle to career in Central Oregon. They do this by fostering cross-sector collaboration bringing together partners from education, business, health, philanthropy,…

Human Services
5
Oregon Human Development Corporation

To promote economic and social advancement of farmworkers and disadvantaged individuals through the provision of education, training, advocacy and services that enhance self-sufficiency.

Human Services
6
Team for Economic Action in Molalla

To build and maintain strong, diverse business districts; to create and retain living wage jobs; and to promote Molalla as a rewarding place to work, live, invest, and shop.

Community Improvement
7
The Campbell Institute

Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.

Unclassified
8
Urban League of Portland Inc

To help empower african americans and others achieve equality in education, employment, and economic security.

Human Services
9
Cultivate Initiatives

The organization collectively works alongside those on the margins to empower individuals and communities through an inclusive range of services and support in east portland.

Housing & Shelter
10
Oregon Energy Systems Technology and Research
Environment
11
Central Oregon Villages

Central oregon villages mission is to advocate for and provide safe and secure shelter, housing and related services in central oreogn for the unhoused populations or at risk of becoming unhoused.

Housing & Shelter
12
Clackamas Service Center

Clackamas service center is an inclusive, "one-stop" community center for individuals and families seeking food relief and resources for improved health, dignity, and stability.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid Willamette Valley Community Action Agency and the most unlike its peers is Olalla Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%13%<5yr13%9%5–10yr18%13%10–20yr19%17%20–35yr12%35%35–55yr16%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%9%<5yr13%3%5–10yr18%14%10–20yr19%24%20–35yr12%40%35–55yr16%10%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 6% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
6%
2/34
the rest of the field
12%
1,336/11,473

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ECUMENICAL MINISTRIES OF OREGON — $217,586 · OtherECUMENICAL MINISTRIES OF OREGONOREGON EDUCATION ASSOCIATION — $111,463 · OtherOREGON EDUCATION ASSOCIATIONOREGON STATE UNIVERSITY — $58,850 · OtherOREGON STATE UNIVERSITYOLALLA CENTER — $55,500 · OtherOLALLA CENTERCLACKAMAS EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRIC — $48,398 · OtherCLACKAMAS EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICKLAMATH HOUSING AUTHORITY — $43,950 · OtherKLAMATH HOUSING AUTHORITYACCESS — $41,625 · OtherSouth Central Oregon Economic Development District — $32,850 · OtherGARFIELD ELEMENTARY PARENT TEACHER — $29,450 · Other+9 more — $155,182 · Other+9 moreSTRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIES — $68,950 · Human ServicesSTRENGTHENING RU…NEIGHBORIMPACT — $51,600 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORIMPACTCASA LATINOS UNIDOS DE BENTON COUNTY — $44,800 · Human ServicesCASA LATINOS UNI…OLD MILL CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $29,000 · Human ServicesOLD MILL CENTER …COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC — $14,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY OUTREA…Upstream Access — $12,000 · Human Services+1 more — $7,500 · Human ServicesLINN BENTON LINCOLN HEALTH EQUITY ALLIANCE — $71,068 · HealthLINN BENTON…PARROTT CREEK CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $67,000 · HealthPARROTT CRE…CORVALLIS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER — $22,000 · HealthCORVALLIS D…FARMWORKER HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $150,931 · Housing & ShelterFARMWORKER …Cascade Pacific RC&D Area — $84,038 · Community ImprovementCascade P…Corvallis Multicultural Literacy Center — $36,000 · Community ImprovementCorvallis…COMMUNITY LENDINGWORKS — $10,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY…GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF LANE AND SOUTH COAST COUNTIES INC — $68,550 · EmploymentCORVALLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $16,000 · Philanthropy
Other$794,854Human Services$228,350Health$160,068Housing & Shelter$150,931Community Improvement$130,038Employment$68,550Philanthropy$16,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFARMWORKER HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $150,931 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCascade Pacific RC&D Area — $84,038 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSTRENGTHENING RURAL FAMILIES — $68,950 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF LANE AND SOUTH COAST COUNTIES INC — $68,550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPARROTT CREEK CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $67,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetOLALLA CENTER — $55,500 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetNEIGHBORIMPACT — $51,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCASA LATINOS UNIDOS DE BENTON COUNTY — $44,800 over 2y, 11% of budgetACCESS — $41,625 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCorvallis Multicultural Literacy Center — $36,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetOLD MILL CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $29,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG ROOTS OREGON — $26,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCORVALLIS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER — $22,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetMID WILLAMETTE VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY — $21,609 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Oregon Inc — $18,225 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCORVALLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $16,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetECHO MOUNTAIN FIRE RELIEF — $15,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCOMMUNITY OUTREACH INC — $14,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOregon Farmers Markets Association — $13,903 over 2y, 22% of budgetUpstream Access — $12,000 over 1y, 9.7% of budgetVINA MOSES WELFARE CENTER INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR42.5× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Ford Family Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Benton Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Intercommunity Health Plans Inc · Juan Young Trust · The Roundhouse Foundation · United Way of Benton & Lincoln Counties · Good Samaritan Hospital Corvallis

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Corvallis Neighborhood Housing Services Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 38%
  • Oregon Farmers Markets Association90% of income from government
  • Mid Willamette Valley Community Action Agency81% of income from government
  • Neighborimpact68% of income from government
  • Access65% of income from government
  • Upstream Access53% of income from government
  • Strengthening Rural Families43% of income from government
  • Community Lendingworks43% of income from government
  • Old Mill Center for Children and Families Inc38% of income from government
  • Corvallis Multicultural Literacy Center37% of income from government
  • Casa Latinos Unidos De Benton County36% of income from government
  • Young Roots Oregon21% of income from government
  • Parrott Creek Child and Family Services20% of income from government
  • Corvallis Daytime Drop-in Center8% of income from government
  • Community Outreach Inc7% of income from government
  • Farmworker Housing Development Corporation7% of income from government
  • Goodwill Industries of Lane and South Coast Counties Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph