Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Public charity

Intercommunity Health Plans Inc

To provide management of integrated health care services.

$2.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
35
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$255k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$3.4MHuman Services$591kPhilanthropy$400kCrime & Legal$156kHousing & Shelter$71kInternational$52kYouth Development$19kPublic Safety & Disaster$10k
02FY2024 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $225k
  • $50k–250k24 grants · $2.1M
  • $250k+1 grant · $255k
$60,143
Median grant
1
States reached
$168M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BENTON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$255,312
UNITED WAY OF LINN BENTON & LINCOLN$200,000
BENTON FURNITURE SHARE$177,331
COMMUNITY SERVICES CONSORTIUM$174,966
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF LINCOLN COUNTY$166,500
UNITY SHELTER INC$117,716
FAITH COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK$104,260
FAMILY TREE RELIEF NURSERY$93,024
DEV NW$93,013
CASA LATINOS UNIDOS$80,764
YOUNG ROOTS OREGON$73,560
MID WILLAMETTE TRANS SUPPORT NETWORK$71,152
COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC$70,886
PATHFINDER CLUBHOUSE$66,951
FAITH HOPE AND CHARITY$63,097
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $824k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BENTON FURNITURE SHARE: $177k → 13%UNITY SHELTER INC: $118k → 18%ECLB: $60k → 13%ONE2ANOTHER: $20k → 13%OLD MILL CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIE: $9k → 18%ONE TO ANOTHER: $19k → 13%CASA LATINOS UNIDOS: $81k → 18%FAITH COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK: $104k → 13%MID WILLAMETTE TRANS SUPPORT NETWORK: $71k → 18%COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $71k → 18%VINA MOSES WELFARE CENTER: $36k → 18%ABC HOUSE: $58k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.5M · 5 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

5 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 31 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

$2.5M
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+60%

Still filing today

40%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BENTON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
    7× · 2017–2024 · $932k
  • LC
    LINN COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES
    7× · 2017–2024 · $785k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF LINN BENTON AND LINCOLN COUNTIES
    2× · 2022–2024 · $400k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • LB
    LINN BENTON LINCOLN EDUCATIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT (LBL-ESD)
    one grant, 2023 · $38k
  • YE
    YOUTH ERAgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $19k · revenue +60%
  • SM
    SANTIAM MEMORIAL HOSPITALgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +217%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eastern Oregon Health and Wellness Inc

Eastern oregon health & wellness provides recovery housing and outpatient services that support individuals and families impacted by substance use disorder through safe housing, trauma-informed care, and community-based support.

Health
2
Thrive Central Oregon

To connect individuals to the housing and community resources they seek.

Human Services
3
Community Wellness Collective

Mental health, drug abuse support. Operating a day-shelter and inclement weather shelter serving unhoused individuals in Newberg.

Health
4
Welcome Home Coalition

Welcome Home is a diverse coalition in the Portland metropolitan region that uses its collective resources to create healthy communities by ensuring everyone has an affordable and stable home. We use community education and collaboration…

Community Improvement
5
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
6
The Alliance for Community Wellness Dba La Familia Counseling Services

La Familia Counseling Service is an inclusive Latino community-based, multi-cultural organization committed to strengthening the emotional wellness of individuals and the preservation of families.

—
7
Family Forward Oregon

We work collectively to educate and advocate for systems that elevate the vital work of care and caregiving in its many forms within our community.

Human Services
8
Oslc Community Programs dba Oregon Community Programs

Provide outpatient mental and behavioral therapy for children and families, therapeutic treatment foster care to at-risk youth, as well as a variety of parent training services.

Science & Tech
9
Columbia Wellness

CARE. Commitment to improving quality of life. Advocacy for mental health and overall well-being. Response to community needs. Effective treatment with measurable outcomes.

—
10
Oregon Child Abuse Solutions

To ensure children and youth in oregon have access to high quality, comprehensive services and resources to address child abuse.

Crime & Legal
11
The Everly Project

Our mission is to provide trauma-informed harm reduction services to people who are unhoused in the Portland Metro area. Our focus is on mental health services, nursing care, extreme weather supplies, food and safer use supplies for people…

Health
12
Carry It Forward

The name "Carry It Forward" is meant to highlight the mutual benefits ofdirect service to our unhoused neighbors. Our work is designed to reducesuffering by meeting basic human needs while developing a sustainable modelfor incorporating…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helping Hands Reentry Outreach Centers and the most unlike its peers is Benton Furniture Share. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyResidential Support ServicesLinn-Benton Regional Commun…Child Advocacy & Protection…Rural Community Events & De…Food Assistance & Gleaning
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 8 years old; the field is 22. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%21%<5yr12%38%5–10yr17%8%10–20yr20%13%20–35yr14%17%35–55yr19%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%16%<5yr12%37%5–10yr17%6%10–20yr20%11%20–35yr14%30%35–55yr19%1%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 21% of your grantees by number, and just 16% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/41
the rest of the field
9%
152/1,740

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
8/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BENTON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT — $932,499 · OtherBENTON COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENTLINN COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES — $785,170 · OtherLINN COUNTY HEALTH SERVICESLINCOLN COUNTY OREGON — $357,929 · OtherLINCOLN COUNTY OREGONCOMMUNITY SERVICES CONSORTIUM — $174,966 · OtherCOMMUNITY SERVICES CONSORTIUMHOUSING AUTHORITY OF LINCOLN COUNTY — $166,500 · OtherHOUSING AUTHORITY OF LINCOLN COUNTY+16 more — $641,263 · Other+16 moreBENTON FURNITURE SHARE — $177,331 · Human ServicesBENTON FURNITURE SH…UNITY SHELTER — $117,716 · Human ServicesUNITY SHELTERFAITH COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK — $104,260 · Human ServicesFAITH COMMUNITY HEA…CASA LATINOS UNIDOS DE BENTON COUNTY — $80,764 · Human ServicesCASA LATINOS UNIDOS…Mid-Willamette Trans Support Network — $71,152 · Human ServicesMid-Willamette Tran…COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC — $70,886 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY OUTREACH …ECLB — $60,000 · Human ServicesECLBABC HOUSE FOUNDATION — $58,000 · Human ServicesABC HOUSE FOUNDATIO…One II Another — $39,456 · Human ServicesVINA MOSES WELFARE CENTER INC — $35,909 · Human Services+1 more — $8,900 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF LINN BENTON AND LINCOLN COUNTIES — $400,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WA…FAMILY TREE RELIEF NURSERY — $93,024 · Crime & LegalFAITH HOPE & CHARITY INC — $63,097 · Crime & LegalCROSSROADS COMMUNITIES — $63,000 · Housing & ShelterCREATING HOUSING COALITION — $60,000 · Housing & ShelterHEART OF THE VALLEY BIRTH&BEYOND DBA COMMUNITY DOULA PROGRAM — $60,452 · HealthHELPING HANDS REENTRY OUTREACH CENTERS — $23,341 · HealthSANTIAM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $10,000 · HealthPATHFINDER CLUBHOUSE — $66,951 · Employment
Other$3,058,327Human Services$824,374Philanthropy$400,000Crime & Legal$156,121Housing & Shelter$123,000Health$93,793Employment$66,951

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF LINN BENTON AND LINCOLN COUNTIES — $400,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetBENTON FURNITURE SHARE — $177,331 over 1y, 23% of budgetUNITY SHELTER — $117,716 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetFAITH COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK — $104,260 over 1y, 95% of budgetFAMILY TREE RELIEF NURSERY — $93,024 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCORVALLIS NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES INC — $93,013 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCASA LATINOS UNIDOS DE BENTON COUNTY — $80,764 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetYOUNG ROOTS OREGON — $73,560 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY OUTREACH INC — $70,886 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetPATHFINDER CLUBHOUSE — $66,951 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetFAITH HOPE & CHARITY INC — $63,097 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetCROSSROADS COMMUNITIES — $63,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetHEART OF THE VALLEY BIRTH&BEYOND DBA COMMUNITY DOULA PROGRAM — $60,452 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetECLB — $60,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCREATING HOUSING COALITION — $60,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCascade Pacific RC&D Area — $59,130 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetABC HOUSE FOUNDATION — $58,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSALEM FOR REFUGEES — $52,300 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWEAVING FALA — $51,896 over 1y, 40% of budgetOne II Another — $39,456 over 2y, 27% of budgetVINA MOSES WELFARE CENTER INC — $35,909 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetHELPING HANDS REENTRY OUTREACH CENTERS — $23,341 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYOUTH ERA — $19,455 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMETROPOLITAN AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION — $11,401 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSANTIAM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON FAMILY SUPPORT NETWORK INC — $9,728 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOLD MILL CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC — $8,900 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …Benton Community Foun…The Ford Family Found…The Collins FoundationGood Samaritan Hospit…United Way of Linn Be…The Roundhouse Founda…Meyer Memorial TrustThe Autzen FoundationMarie Lamfrom Charita…Corvallis Neighborhoo…Linn Benton Food Share
The Oregon Community FoundationOR49.6× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Benton Community Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Good Samaritan Hospital Corvallis · United Way of Linn Benton and Lincoln Counties · The Roundhouse Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Autzen Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Corvallis Neighborhood Housing Services Inc · Linn Benton Food Share

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Intercommunity Health Plans Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 36%
  • Family Tree Relief Nursery — 57% of income from government
  • Oregon Family Support Network Inc — 53% of income from government
  • Pathfinder Clubhouse — 44% of income from government
  • Unity Shelter — 42% of income from government
  • Youth Era — 39% of income from government
  • Old Mill Center for Children and Families Inc — 38% of income from government
  • Faith Hope & Charity Inc — 36% of income from government
  • Casa Latinos Unidos De Benton County — 36% of income from government
  • Salem for Refugees — 35% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Affordable Housing Corporation — 24% of income from government
  • Young Roots Oregon — 21% of income from government
  • Helping Hands Reentry Outreach Centers — 18% of income from government
  • Corvallis Neighborhood Housing Services Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Community Outreach Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Santiam Memorial Hospital — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines