Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Corinthian International Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
51
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Arts & Culture$949kReligion$879kFood & Nutrition$871kHuman Services$672kEducation$668kInternational$639kPublic Benefit$506kHealth$486kOther$0
02FY2024 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k32 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $251k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $750k
$2,500
Median grant
11
States reached
$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Good People Foundation$200,000
Hatzalah South Florida Emergency Medical Services$100,000
Weill Cornell Medicine$100,000
Institute For Curriculum Services$100,000
New Yorkers Against Gun Violence Education Fund$50,070
Individual grant recipient$50,000
Rescuing Leftover Cuisine$50,000
FACE TO FACE VICTORY GARDEN$50,000
SIRUM$50,000
Us Holocaust Memorial Museum$46,535
REMA HORT MANN FOUNDATION$42,585
Footsteps$30,000
Sights On Health Inc$25,000
FIDF$25,000
Public Theater$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $718k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UPLIFT AFGHANISTAN FUND: $68k → 10%KOREAN AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICE CENTER: $1k → 14%ADAPTABILITY: $29k → 20%SOLES4SOULS: $1k → 14%PORT HEALTH SERVICES: $5k → 20%CHILDREN OF PROMISE: $5k → 15%ONE SIMPLE WISH: $1k → 11%BIKOR CHOLIM OF LAKEWOOD: $5k → 11%Life's WORC: $1k → 6%ADAPTABILITY: $26k → 20%SOULS 4 SOULS INC: $1k → 14%ADAPTABILITY: $15k → 20%THE CENTER FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $5k → 17%ADAPTABILITY: $15k → 20%ADAPTABILITY: $15k → 20%ADAPTABILITY: $10k → 20%Center For Food Action: $1k → 7%ADAPTABILITY: $10k → 20%GREATER RIDGEWOOD YOUTH COUNCIL: $1k → 13%HOT BREAD KITCHEN LTD: $10k → 20%Accountability Lab: $50k → 14%CorpsAfrica: $3k → 14%Footsteps: $30k → 17%Footsteps: $20k → 17%Footsteps: $15k → 17%FOOTSTEPS: $10k → 17%START SMALL THINK BIG: $51k → 17%START SMALL THINK BIG: $50k → 17%START SMALL THINK BIG: $50k → 17%START SMALL THINK BIG: $50k → 17%START SMALL THINK BIG: $50k → 17%START SMALL THINK BIG: $5k → 17%COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT INC: $400 → 17%Chinese-American Planning Council Inc: $1k → 17%BRAVER ANGELS: $100k → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $1k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED: $3k → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.9M · 62 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

62 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 35 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

62
203

Total granted

$3.9M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+24%

Still filing today

63%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $463k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesInternationalEducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RL
    RESCUING LEFTOVER CUISINE INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $400k · revenue +301%
  • NY
    NEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE EDUCATION FUND INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $300k · revenue +70%
  • SS
    START SMALL THINK BIG INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $256k · revenue +237%

Funded once

  • JI
    JEWBELONG INC
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue +3%
  • NC
    NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CITIZENSHIP
    one grant, 2020 · $106k · revenue -53%
  • RE
    RepresentUs Education Fundgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
3
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
4
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
5
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
6
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
7
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
8
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
9
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
10
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
11
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
12
Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc

For over 20 years, chai's mission has been to save lives and improve health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries around the world. we do this by enabling the government and private sector to strengthen and sustain quality health…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Liberty Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Papa John's Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Community FoundationsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Christian Missionary Organi…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Food Banks and PantriesImmigrant Worker SupportHealth Access Advocacy and …Animal Rescue and ShelterDevelopmental Disabilities …Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community Arts CentersCancer Support ServicesYouth Development ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Policy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%8%<5yr14%6%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr19%20%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%8%<5yr14%10%5–10yr20%44%10–20yr19%15%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%11%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/177
the rest of the field
10%
11,856/120,583

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

172 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 172 of the 292 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
170/172
Grantees still filing
100/172
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FACE TO FACE VICTORY GARDEN — $350,000 · OtherFACE TO FACE VICTORY GARDENIndividual grant recipient — $300,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWeill Cornell Medicine — $200,000 · OtherWeill Cornell MedicineThe Good People Foundation — $200,000 · OtherThe Good People FoundationUS HOLOCUAST MEMORIAL COUNCIL — $164,505 · OtherPROJECT AKILAH DBA AKILAH FOUNDATION — $122,700 · OtherRepresentUs — $153,000 · OtherSUPPORTING INITIATIVES TO REDISTRIBUTE UNUSED MEDICINE - SIRUM — $150,000 · OtherREMA HORT MANN FOUNDATION INC — $164,485 · Other+135 more — $1,827,711 · Other+135 moreNEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE EDUCATION FUND INC — $300,070 · Arts & CultureNEW YORKERS A…The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $231,149 · Arts & CultureThe United St…NEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $191,300 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK SHAK…THEATRE FOR A NEW AUDIENCE INC — $42,000 · Arts & CultureTHEATRE FOR A…+4 more — $11,750 · Arts & CultureSTART SMALL THINK BIG INC — $256,000 · Human ServicesSTART SMALL …ADAPT ABILITY INC — $119,140 · Human ServicesADAPT ABILIT…Braver AngelsInc — $100,000 · Human ServicesBraver Angel…FOOTSTEPS INC — $90,000 · Human ServicesFOOTSTEPS IN…Uplift Afghanistan Fund — $68,000 · Human ServicesUplift Afgha…ACCOUNTABILITY LAB INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesACCOUNTABILI…+11 more — $53,000 · Human Services+11 moreSIGHTS ON HEALTH INC — $181,940 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $80,000 · InternationalNOVA UKRAINE — $75,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $25,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $18,349 · InternationalTHE KOSCIUSZKO FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · International+8 more — $47,510 · InternationalRESCUING LEFTOVER CUISINE INC — $400,000 · Food & Nutrition+4 more — $13,500 · Food & NutritionINSTITUTE FOR CURRICULUM SERVICES — $100,000 · EducationPARTNERS IN TORAH INC — $100,000 · EducationUATX — $50,033 · EducationTHE ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS INC — $31,000 · Education+5 more — $27,104 · EducationJEWBELONG INC — $250,000 · ReligionFAITH IN NEW YORK — $30,000 · ReligionFRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW INC — $26,000 · Religion
Other$3,632,401Arts & Culture$776,269Human Services$736,140International$442,799Food & Nutrition$413,500Education$308,137Religion$306,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRESCUING LEFTOVER CUISINE INC — $400,000 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetNEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE EDUCATION FUND INC — $300,070 over 6y, 10% of budgetSTART SMALL THINK BIG INC — $256,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetJEWBELONG INC — $250,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $231,149 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $191,300 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSIGHTS ON HEALTH INC — $181,940 over 7y, 66% of budgetREMA HORT MANN FOUNDATION INC — $164,485 over 8y, 7.2% of budgetRepresentUs — $153,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetSUPPORTING INITIATIVES TO REDISTRIBUTE UNUSED MEDICINE - SIRUM — $150,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetADAPT ABILITY INC — $119,140 over 7y, 50% of budgetNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CITIZENSHIP — $106,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetRepresentUs Education Fund — $100,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetPARTNERS IN TORAH INC — $100,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetBraver AngelsInc — $100,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetHATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC — $100,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetFOOTSTEPS INC — $90,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $80,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNOVA UKRAINE — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUplift Afghanistan Fund — $68,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetUATX — $50,033 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGENERATION CITIZEN INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetACCOUNTABILITY LAB INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetThe Face To Face Project Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFLORIDA FOR UKRAINE INC — $44,562 over 1y, 37% of budgetTHEATRE FOR A NEW AUDIENCE INC — $42,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ORGANIZING — $35,915 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS INC — $31,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetFAITH IN NEW YORK — $30,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW INC — $26,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCents Ability Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetTHE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOARDASSIST — $20,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $18,349 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAPIARY FOR PRACTICAL SUPPORT INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE KOSCIUSZKO FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND — $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEJ AUTISM FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetHIAS INC — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $10,104 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINMOTION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSEACREST SCHOOL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RESCUING LEFTOVER CUISINE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds START SMALL THINK BIG INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWBELONG INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds SIGHTS ON HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds REMA HORT MANN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RepresentUs ↗
  • Who funds SUPPORTING INITIATIVES TO REDISTRIBUTE UNUSED MEDICINE - SIRUM ↗
  • Who funds ADAPT ABILITY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CITIZENSHIP ↗
  • Who funds RepresentUs Education Fund ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR CURRICULUM SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds Braver AngelsInc ↗
  • Who funds HATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOTSTEPS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds NOVA UKRAINE ↗
  • Who funds Uplift Afghanistan Fund ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds UATX ↗
  • Who funds GENERATION CITIZEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCOUNTABILITY LAB INC ↗
  • Who funds The Face To Face Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundOpen Society InstituteThe Warburg Pincus Fo…American Express Foun…Credit Suisse America…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Tides FoundationJpmorgan Chase Founda…The Ford FoundationHopewell FundThe New York Communit…Silicon Valley Commun…
Jewish Communal FundNY22.1× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Open Society Institute · The Warburg Pincus Foundation · American Express Foundation · Credit Suisse Americas Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Tides Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Hopewell Fund · The New York Community Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Corinthian International Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 190%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
  • Newark Public Radio Inc — 51% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
  • Young Musicians Unite Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Center for Food Action in New Jersey — 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
19get no government money at all
34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 292 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home