Skip to content
Colket Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Colket Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$37kRecreation & Sports$32kReligion$29kHealth$18kHuman Services$17kInternational$4kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $8,559, the rows itemized in this filing. The $51,171 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $42,612 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$475
Median grant
4
States reached
$717k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION$2,690
CAMP SUMMIT$2,347
MANEGAIT$1,100
GREEN WAVE CLUB AT TULANE UNIV$1,000
HEROES$475
HEARTEST YARD FOUNDATION$267
COVENANT HOUSE$250
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$250
FRIENDS OF FAIRVIEW FIREFIGHTERS$180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%COVENANT HOUSE INTL: $250 → 17%The Flatwater Foundation: $200 → 10%COVENANT HOUSE: $250 → 16%CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $118 → 12%THE SUMMER HOUSE: $1k → 16%METROCREST SERVICES: $250 → 14%MANEGAIT: $2k → 5%MANEGAIT: $1k → 5%MANEGAIT: $1k → 5%MANEGAIT: $1k → 5%MANEGAIT: $1k → 5%MANEGAIT: $945 → 5%MANEGAIT: $945 → 5%ManeGait: $900 → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$114k · 38 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

38 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

38
82

Total granted

$114k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+12%

Still filing today

71%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $767 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HE
    HELPING EVERYONE REACH OUTSTANDING EDUCATIONAL SUCCESS
    7× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +69%
  • MG
    Mane Gait
    8× · 2017–2024 · $9k · revenue +210%
  • FV
    FOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL OF COLORADO
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JOHNS EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE REDEEMER
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
2
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
5
Banner Alzheimer's Foundation

Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…

Health
6
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
7
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
8
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
9
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
12
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Visiontrust International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Clubfoot Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 123 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
55/57
Grantees still filing
39/57
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION: $19,880 · OtherADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATIONST PHILIPS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $10,875 · OtherST PHILIPS EPISCOPAL CHURCHST JOHNS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $7,500 · OtherST JOHNS EPISCOPAL CHURCHCORNERSTONE RANCH: $7,059 · OtherCORNERSTONE RANCH+84 more: $53,339 · Other+84 moreHELPING EVERYONE REACH OUTSTANDING EDUCATIONAL SUCCESS: $9,580 · HealthHELPING EVER…TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $4,000 · HealthTEXAS SCOTTI…Go Jen Go Foundation Inc: $1,035 · HealthGo Jen Go Fo…+9 more: $2,775 · Health+9 moreMane Gait: $9,340 · Human ServicesMane GaitABANDON PROJECT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesABANDON PR…The Summerhouse: $1,000 · Human ServicesThe Summer…URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Human ServicesURBAN IMPA…EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $750 · Human Services+5 more: $1,168 · Human Services+5 moreFOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL OF COLORADO: $6,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR LOVEJOY SCHOOLS: $2,500 · EducationTEXAS TECH ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $1,000 · EducationTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $850 · EducationGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC: $750 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $600 · Education+2 more: $300 · EducationCAMP SUMMIT INC: $8,417 · Youth DevelopmentCAMP OZARK FOUNDATION INC: $1,750 · Youth Development+1 more: $250 · Youth DevelopmentSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $3,000 · ReligionWreaths Across America: $2,000 · Public Benefit
Other$98,653Health$17,390Human Services$14,258Education$12,000Youth Development$10,417Religion$3,000Public Benefit$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHELPING EVERYONE REACH OUTSTANDING EDUCATIONAL SUCCESS: $9,580 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMane Gait: $9,340 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP SUMMIT INC: $8,417 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL OF COLORADO: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR LOVEJOY SCHOOLS: $2,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN INN INC: $2,450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWreaths Across America: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP OZARK FOUNDATION INC: $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPI BETA PHI FOUNDATION: $1,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA of Texas: $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSKY RANCHES INC: $1,589 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJAMAICA BEACH VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetALLEN COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC: $1,050 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGo Jen Go Foundation Inc: $1,035 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTEXAS TECH ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Army Historical Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHI OMEGA FOUNDATION: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LUNCH PROJECT: $522 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMercy Ships International: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC THE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTH CAROLINA: $265 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMY POSSIBILITIES: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROCREST SERVICES: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget24 Foundation Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH: $218 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSigma Alpha Epsilon Foundation: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FLATWATER FOUNDATON: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIC ALERT FOUNDATION UNITED STATES: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HELPING EVERYONE REACH OUTSTANDING EDUCATIONAL SUCCESS ↗
  • Who funds Mane Gait ↗
  • Who funds CAMP SUMMIT INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR LOVEJOY SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN INN INC ↗
  • Who funds Wreaths Across America ↗
  • Who funds CAMP OZARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PI BETA PHI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPCA of Texas ↗
  • Who funds SKY RANCHES INC ↗
  • Who funds JAMAICA BEACH VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLEN COMMUNITY OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Go Jen Go Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TECH ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds The Army Historical Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ABANDON PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds The Summerhouse ↗
  • Who funds URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…Texas Instruments Fou…Duke Energy FoundationUnited Way WorldwideCoserv Charitable Fou…Synchrony FoundationThe Dallas FoundationHillcrest FoundationEquitable Foundation …Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Blackbaud Giving …Albemarle Foundation
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX21.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Coserv Charitable Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · Equitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Albemarle Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Colket Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Colket Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 123 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Colket’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home