· Private foundation
Colket Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $8,559 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $51,171 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $42,612 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ADAPTIVE SPORTS ASSOCIATION | $2,690 |
| CAMP SUMMIT | $2,347 |
| MANEGAIT | $1,100 |
| GREEN WAVE CLUB AT TULANE UNIV | $1,000 |
| HEROES | $475 |
| HEARTEST YARD FOUNDATION | $267 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS | $250 |
| COVENANT HOUSE | $250 |
| FRIENDS OF FAIRVIEW FIREFIGHTERS | $180 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
38 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $767 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HEHELPING EVERYONE REACH OUTSTANDING EDUCATIONAL SUCCESS7× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +69%
- MGMane Gait8× · 2017–2024 · $9k · revenue +210%
- FVFOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL OF COLORADO2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +9%
Funded once
- SJST JOHNS EPISCOPAL CHURCHone grant, 2017 · $8k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $3k
- COCHURCH OF THE REDEEMERone grant, 2018 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.
City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.
Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…
To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Visiontrust International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Clubfoot Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 123 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HELPING EVERYONE REACH OUTSTANDING EDUCATIONAL SUCCESS ↗
- Who funds Mane Gait ↗
- Who funds CAMP SUMMIT INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds TEXAS SCOTTISH RITE HOSPITAL FOR CRIPPLED CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR LOVEJOY SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN INN INC ↗
- Who funds Wreaths Across America ↗
- Who funds CAMP OZARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PI BETA PHI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPCA of Texas ↗
- Who funds SKY RANCHES INC ↗
- Who funds ALLEN COMMUNITY OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds JAMAICA BEACH VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds Go Jen Go Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Army Historical Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds TEXAS TECH ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds ABANDON PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds The Summerhouse ↗
- Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Coserv Charitable Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · Equitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Albemarle Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Colket Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.