Skip to content

· Public charity

California Colorectal Cancer Coalition

C4 is a statewide, all-volunteer non-profit organization consisting of academic clinicians, physicians, public health practitioners, crc survivors and advocates, and nonprofit partners.

$245k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Health$344k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$175k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Petaluma Health Center$45,000
Western Sierra Medical Clinic$30,000
Mission Neighborhood Health Center$30,000
The Achievable Foundation$20,000
Alexander Valley Health Care$20,000
Bartz-Altadonna Community$20,000
Operation Samham$20,000
Gardner Family Health Network$20,000
Northeast Valley Health Corporation$10,000
Vista Community Clinic$10,000
Shasta Community Health Center$10,000
Cheeky Charity$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Achievable Foundation: $20k → 14%The Achievable Foundation: $19k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$154k · 4 repeat orgs$190k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$154k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+18%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $155k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WESTERN SIERRA MEDICAL CLINIC INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $45k · revenue +13%
  • THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $39k · revenue +39%
  • BC
    BARTZ-ALTADONNA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $35k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • NORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +18%
  • COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
2
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
3
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
4
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
5
Nuestra Clinica Del Valle Inc

Our mission is to provide comprehensive, patient-centered primary care and to cultivate partnerships between our patients and their health care providers while excelling at customer service.

—
6
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
7
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
8
Pomona Community Health Center

Pomona community health center's mission is to be the medical home for the underserved in our community by providing high quality preventive and primary care health services.

Health
9
Valley Health Team Inc

Valley Health Team, Inc. was established in 1973 for the purpose of providing accessible comprehensive, quality primary health care and additional services to the people in the communities we serve in a culturally and linguistically…

Health
10
Nevada Health Centers Inc

NVHC provides health services throughout the State of Nevada. Health services include OB/GYN, Pediatrics, Internal Medicine, Primary medical, Behavioral Health and dental care services. NVHC operates a mobile mammography clinic, two mobile…

Health
11
Westside Family Health Center

Westside Family Health Center provides comprehensive, high quality, cost effective health care in an educational and supportive environment that empowers patients to take an assertive role in caring for their well-being through all stages…

Health
12
Mendocino Community Health Clinic Inc

To provide the highest quality healthcare for everyone in our communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Area Health Associates; the most unlike its peers is Cheeky Charity Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTERN SIERRA MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $45,000 · HealthWESTERN SIERRA MEDICAL CLINIC INCPETALUMA HEALTH CENTER INC: $45,000 · HealthPETALUMA HEALTH CENTER INCBARTZ-ALTADONNA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $35,000 · HealthBARTZ-ALTADONNA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERGARDNER FAMILY HEALTH NETWORK INC: $35,000 · HealthGARDNER FAMILY HEALTH NETWORK INCMISSION AREA HEALTH ASSOCIATES: $30,000 · HealthMISSION AREA HEALTH ASSOCIATESNORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES: $20,000 · HealthNORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICESOPERATION SAMAHAN INC: $20,000 · HealthOPERATION SAMAHAN INCCOPPERTOWER FAMILY MED CTR INC DBA ALEXANDER VALLEY HEALTHCARE: $20,000 · HealthCOPPERTOWER FAMILY MED CTR INC DBA ALEXANDER VALLEY HEALTHCARENORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION: $10,000 · HealthVISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC: $10,000 · HealthCheeky Charity Inc: $10,000 · HealthSHASTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $10,000 · HealthTHE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $38,562 · Human ServicesTHE ACHIEVAB…COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $15,000 · Other
Health$290,000Human Services$38,562Other$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWESTERN SIERRA MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPETALUMA HEALTH CENTER INC: $45,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $38,562 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBARTZ-ALTADONNA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGARDNER FAMILY HEALTH NETWORK INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION AREA HEALTH ASSOCIATES: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SAMAHAN INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOPPERTOWER FAMILY MED CTR INC DBA ALEXANDER VALLEY HEALTHCARE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHASTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California FdnCA30.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · California Healthcare Foundation · Direct Relief · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Primary Care Association · Tides Foundation · Norcal Group Foundation · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · California Community Foundation · Essential Access Health · Tides Center · Reach Out and Read Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization California Colorectal Cancer Coalition funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from California Colorectal Cancer Coalition. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to California Colorectal Cancer Coalition?

    Find your warmest path to California Colorectal Cancer Coalition through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on California Colorectal Cancer Coalition’s filings →

    More from the funding graph