Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

California Colorectal Cancer Coalition

C4 is a statewide, all-volunteer non-profit organization consisting of academic clinicians, physicians, public health practitioners, crc survivors and advocates, and nonprofit partners.

$245k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232024.

Health$344k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$175k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Petaluma Health Center$45,000
Western Sierra Medical Clinic$30,000
Mission Neighborhood Health Center$30,000
The Achievable Foundation$20,000
Gardner Family Health Network$20,000
Bartz-Altadonna Community$20,000
Operation Samham$20,000
Alexander Valley Health Care$20,000
Northeast Valley Health Corporation$10,000
Vista Community Clinic$10,000
Shasta Community Health Center$10,000
Cheeky Charity$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The Achievable Foundation: $20k → 14%The Achievable Foundation: $19k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$154k · 4 repeat orgs$190k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
2

Total granted

$154k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+18%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $155k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WESTERN SIERRA MEDICAL CLINIC INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $45k · revenue +13%
  • THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $39k · revenue +39%
  • BC
    BARTZ-ALTADONNA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $35k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • NORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +18%
  • COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
2
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
3
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
4
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

5
Nuestra Clinica Del Valle Inc

Our mission is to provide comprehensive, patient-centered primary care and to cultivate partnerships between our patients and their health care providers while excelling at customer service.

6
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
7
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
8
Pomona Community Health Center

Pomona community health center's mission is to be the medical home for the underserved in our community by providing high quality preventive and primary care health services.

Health
9
Valley Health Team Inc

Valley Health Team, Inc. was established in 1973 for the purpose of providing accessible comprehensive, quality primary health care and additional services to the people in the communities we serve in a culturally and linguistically…

Health
10
Nevada Health Centers Inc

NVHC provides health services throughout the State of Nevada. Health services include OB/GYN, Pediatrics, Internal Medicine, Primary medical, Behavioral Health and dental care services. NVHC operates a mobile mammography clinic, two mobile…

Health
11
Westside Family Health Center

Westside Family Health Center provides comprehensive, high quality, cost effective health care in an educational and supportive environment that empowers patients to take an assertive role in caring for their well-being through all stages…

Health
12
Mendocino Community Health Clinic Inc

To provide the highest quality healthcare for everyone in our communities.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Area Health Associates and the most unlike its peers is Cheeky Charity Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WESTERN SIERRA MEDICAL CLINIC INC — $45,000 · HealthWESTERN SIERRA MEDICAL CLINIC INCPETALUMA HEALTH CENTER INC — $45,000 · HealthPETALUMA HEALTH CENTER INCBARTZ-ALTADONNA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $35,000 · HealthBARTZ-ALTADONNA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERGARDNER FAMILY HEALTH NETWORK INC — $35,000 · HealthGARDNER FAMILY HEALTH NETWORK INCMISSION AREA HEALTH ASSOCIATES — $30,000 · HealthMISSION AREA HEALTH ASSOCIATESCOPPERTOWER FAMILY MED CTR INC DBA ALEXANDER VALLEY HEALTHCARE — $20,000 · HealthCOPPERTOWER FAMILY MED CTR INC DBA ALEXANDER VALLEY HEALTHCAREOPERATION SAMAHAN INC — $20,000 · HealthOPERATION SAMAHAN INCNORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES — $20,000 · HealthNORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICESNORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION — $10,000 · HealthVISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC — $10,000 · HealthCheeky Charity Inc — $10,000 · HealthSHASTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $10,000 · HealthTHE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION — $38,562 · Human ServicesTHE ACHIEVAB…COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC — $15,000 · Other
Health$290,000Human Services$38,562Other$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWESTERN SIERRA MEDICAL CLINIC INC — $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPETALUMA HEALTH CENTER INC — $45,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION — $38,562 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBARTZ-ALTADONNA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGARDNER FAMILY HEALTH NETWORK INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION AREA HEALTH ASSOCIATES — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOPPERTOWER FAMILY MED CTR INC DBA ALEXANDER VALLEY HEALTHCARE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOPERATION SAMAHAN INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEAST VALLEY HEALTH CORPORATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA COMMUNITY CLINIC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHASTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California FdnCA30.2× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · California Healthcare Foundation · Direct Relief · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Primary Care Association · Tides Foundation · Norcal Group Foundation · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · California Community Foundation · Essential Access Health · Tides Center · Reach Out and Read Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization California Colorectal Cancer Coalition funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to California Colorectal Cancer Coalition?

    Find your warmest path to California Colorectal Cancer Coalition through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph