Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bradley L Goldberg Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$769k
Granted FY2025still arriving
35
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$1.2MArts & Culture$864kEnvironment$544kEducation$446kHealth$340kHuman Services$214kCrime & Legal$165kPhilanthropy$121kOther$0
02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $114k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $185k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $470k
$10,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MSK CANCER CENTER$130,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$85,000
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY$80,000
WNETTHIRTEEN$75,000
LARCHMONT TEMPLE$50,000
NEW MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART$50,000
UJA FEDERATION NY$27,000
NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN$25,000
HEART$22,500
VEGETARIAN RESOURCE GROUP$15,000
NRDC$15,000
SAVE THE SOUND$10,000
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND$10,000
ANIMAL RECOVERY MISSION$10,000
PET RESCUE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $87k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER & PUTNAM: $5k → 9%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER & PUTNAM: $4k → 9%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER & PUTNAM: $4k → 9%UNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER & PUTNAM: $4k → 9%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $15k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $15k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $10k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $10k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $10k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
CT
RI
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 50 repeat orgs$213k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

50 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
11

Total granted

$3.8M
$130k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
0%

Still filing today

84%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $83k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentEducationArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    Wildlife Conservation Society
    9× · 2017–2025 · $375k · revenue +59%
  • NM
    New Museum of Contemporary Art
    7× · 2017–2025 · $290k · revenue +6%
  • NY
    NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $171k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • YL
    YALE LAW SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • HL
    HARVARD LAW SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • Physicians Committee for Responsible Med
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
3
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
4
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
5
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
6
The Humane League

We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…

Animals
7
Sweet Farm Foundation

Sweet farm is the world's first nonprofit sanctuary to address the devastating impact that factory farming has on climate change from the perspective of animals, plants, and the planet. we must first understand how these pieces are…

Animals
8
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
9
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
10
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
11
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
12
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Farm Sanctuary Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lewis & Clark College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
55/55
Grantees still filing
39/55
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MSK CANCER CENTER: $230,000 · OtherMSK CANCER CENTERHEART: $207,500 · OtherHEARTMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING L YEDDIS FUND: $195,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING L YEDDIS…PCRM: $70,000 · OtherPCRMTRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $60,000 · OtherYALE LAW SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherLARCHMONT TEMPLE INC: $50,000 · OtherTHE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC: $49,500 · OtherTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $70,000 · OtherTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC+13 more: $207,500 · Other+13 moreWildlife Conservation Society: $375,000 · AnimalsWildlife Conservation Societ…Humane World for Animals Inc: $167,500 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals IncFARM SANCTUARY INC: $105,000 · AnimalsFARM SANCTUARY INCWILDAID INC: $80,000 · AnimalsWILDAID INCANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $70,000 · AnimalsANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND IN…SAVE THE CHIMPS INC: $35,000 · AnimalsTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $35,000 · Animals+9 more: $149,500 · Animals+9 moreWNET: $420,000 · Arts & CultureWNETNew Museum of Contemporary Art: $290,000 · Arts & CultureNew Museum of Contempora…Museum of Modern Art: $58,500 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Modern ArtWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $52,500 · Arts & CultureWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERIC…THE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC: $43,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $171,000 · EnvironmentNEW YORK BOTA…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $110,500 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOU…GREENPEACE FUND INC: $70,000 · EnvironmentGREENPEACE FU…SAVE THE SOUND: $47,500 · EnvironmentSAVE THE SOUN…EARTHJUSTICE: $35,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICEMULTIPLIER: $20,000 · Environment+3 more: $30,000 · Environment+3 moreNew York University: $120,000 · EducationLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE: $63,000 · EducationROCKING THE BOAT INC: $10,000 · EducationUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $10,000 · EducationMAMARONECK-LARCHMONT STUDENT AID FUND: $10,000 · EducationNEW YORK COALITION FOR HEALTHY SCHOOL LUNCHES INC: $7,500 · EducationUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $54,000 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $50,000 · PhilanthropyALLIANCE FOR CANCER GENE THERAPY INC: $25,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $2,500 · PhilanthropyBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $52,500 · HealthTHE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC: $45,000 · HealthPhysicians Committee for Responsible Med: $10,000 · HealthLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Health
Other$1,189,500Animals$1,017,000Arts & Culture$864,000Environment$484,000Education$220,500Philanthropy$131,500Health$115,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWNET: $420,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $375,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNew Museum of Contemporary Art: $290,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $171,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $167,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNew York University: $120,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $110,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC: $105,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWILDAID INC: $80,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $70,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $70,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGREENPEACE FUND INC: $70,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE: $63,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $58,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $54,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $52,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $52,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC: $49,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE SOUND: $47,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC: $45,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC: $43,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE CHIMPS INC: $35,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $35,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR HUMANE EDUCATION: $32,500 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetANIMAL RECOVERY MISSION INC: $27,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCHIMP HAVEN INC: $27,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CANCER GENE THERAPY INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHIAS INC: $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMULTIPLIER: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVEGAN FRIENDLY INC: $17,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WESTCHESTER AND PUTNAM: $17,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTER GREEN INC: $15,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetROCKING THE BOAT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOUR HEN HOUSE: $10,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetPhysicians Committee for Responsible Med: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAMARONECK-LARCHMONT STUDENT AID FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBIGS & LITTLES NYC MENTORING INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNonhuman Rights Project Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS OF KATHMANDU INC: $9,000 over 4y, 7.3% of budgetLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WNET ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
  • Who funds New Museum of Contemporary Art ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds FARM SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDAID INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENPEACE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds THE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE SOUND ↗
  • Who funds THE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE CHIMPS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR HUMANE EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL RECOVERY MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHIMP HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds WOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CANCER GENE THERAPY INC ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY16× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vegfund Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Animal Welfare Trust Inc · Nalith Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bradley L Goldberg Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bradley L Goldberg Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 37%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Save the Sound: 37% of income from government
  • Lewis & Clark College: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Bradley L Goldberg Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Bradley L Goldberg Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bradley L Goldberg Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph