· Private foundation
Nalith Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k19 grants · $74k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $32k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTH AMERICAN VEGAN SOCIETY | $22,000 |
| WOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY | $10,000 |
| COALITION FOR HEALTHY SCHOOL FOOD | $9,000 |
| PLANT-BASED PREVENTION OF DISEASE | $8,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| HEALTHY PLANET | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN VEGAN SOCIETY | $5,000 |
| SAVE THE EARTH ECOCENTER | $5,000 |
| CATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY | $4,500 |
| THE VEGAN MUSEUM | $3,500 |
| NATIONAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION | $3,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,500 |
| RESPONSIBLE EATING AND LIVING WW | $3,000 |
| OUR HEN HOUSE | $3,000 |
| COMPASSIONATE LIVING | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 76% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
24 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WFWOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC4× · 2020–2024 · $27k · revenue +12%
- NHNATIONAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION4× · 2021–2024 · $24k · revenue +72%
- AVAMERICAN VEGAN SOCIETY5× · 2020–2024 · $20k · revenue +90%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZone grant, 2021 · $3k
- CFCITIZENS FOR A BETTER S FLone grant, 2020 · $3k
- TNTRUE NORTH HEALTHone grant, 2020 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission at Peaceful Prairie Sanctuary is to provide a safe, loving and permanent home for rescued farmed animals whom are not accepted at most shelters. In addition to providing life-long care for the animals, we are dedicated to…
We firmly believe that the animal welfare and vegan community can significantly enhance their impact by extending their efforts to all corners of the world. Our dedication is to facilitate and contribute to this global outreach, striving…
To provide refuge for unwanted farmed animals, to further their welfare through education of the public and to foster ethics of compassion and responsibility towards nonhuman animals by advocating a vegan lifestyle.
Working to eliminate animal suffering, reduce environmental impacts, and improve human health through a vegan diet.
Growing respect and acceptance for veganism through our dedicated work of rescue and creative care, impactful vegan food programs, vibrant education, and consistent advocacy; all strengthened by our engagement with a rising global network…
Animal and Vegan Advocacy International, Inc. is dedicated to creating a world in which animals are removed from the food system and other human uses. It furthers this mission by convening advocates through an international conference…
This organization was formed to promote the vegan lifestyle and to promote respect and care for all animals.
Our mission is to promote a world where all beings live a just life of dignity and respect. To this end, we engage in practical actions, raise funds, spread understanding and foster compassion.
The organization advocates for animal rights and the vegan lifestyle, through its National Animal Rights Day (NARD) events and other projects that: 1. Promote the idea that animals have, and should have, the same basic rights that humans…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Animal Outlook Inc and the most unlike its peers is Charlies Acres. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Plant-based Prevention Of Disease Inc ↗
- Who funds WOODSTOCK FARM ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CATSKILL ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN VEGAN SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds GO VEGGIE INC ↗
- Who funds Compassionate Actions Project Kind Veg Healthy Vegetarian Food Bank ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR JEWISH FOOD ETHICS ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL OUTLOOK INC ↗
- Who funds Compassionate Living ↗
- Who funds OUR HEN HOUSE ↗
- Who funds GENTLE WORLD INC ↗
- Who funds ANN WIGMORE NATURAL HEALTH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Peace Advocacy Network ↗
- Who funds THE VEGETARIAN RESOURCE GROUP ↗
- Who funds Charlies Acres ↗
- Who funds PIEDMONT FARM ANIMAL REFUGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Vegfund Inc · The Quinn Foundation · Bradley L Goldberg Family Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Nalith Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.