Skip to content

· Private foundation

AstraZeneca Foundation (fka AstraZeneca Healthcare Foundation)

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$5.8MHousing & Shelter$1.5MHuman Services$628kPhilanthropy$595kPublic Safety & Disaster$61kCommunity Improvement$50k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $466k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.0M
$250,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$41M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Health Care for the Homeless Inc$250,000
SOME Inc$250,000
LCH Health and Community Services$250,000
Community Volunteers in Medicine$250,000
AIDS Resource Alliance Inc$249,949
Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc$215,793
Individual grant recipient$2,840
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $750k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LCH Health and Community Services: $250k → 6%LCH Health and Community Services: $250k → 6%LCH Health and Community Services: $250k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
SD
IN
OH
PA
CA
WV
VA
MD
DE
NC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.1M · 16 repeat orgs$500k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
7

Total granted

$8.1M
$500k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+41%

Still filing today

88%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    LCH Health and Community Services
    3× · 2023–2025 · $750k · revenue +1%
  • CV
    COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $750k · revenue +13%
  • HC
    HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $750k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • SW
    Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation
    one grant, 2019 · $125k
  • UO
    University of Mississippi
    one grant, 2019 · $125k
  • WF
    WESTMINSTER FREE CLINICgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +242%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Newark Community Health Centers Inc

The mission of newark community health centers is to provide affordable, high quality, and accessible healthcare to the communities that we serve. as one of the largest providers of comprehensive primary care services for uninsured and…

Health
2
Community Care of West Virginia Inc

The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…

—
3
Interior Community Health Center

Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.

Health
4
Community Care Clinic Inc

To provide health care to low-income persons in the community who do not have health insurance through disease prevention, continuity of care, and active follow-up, we can prmote the health and well-being of the community.

Health
5
Community Health Clinic Inc

The mission of community health clinic is to provide quality, affordable comprehensive primary healthcare services, across the lifecycles and regardless of the ability to pay, to residents of allegheny, armstrong, butler and westmoreland…

Health
6
Community Health Services Inc

To provide medical services for the residents of the greater hartford connecticut area. to provide quality health care services to low and moderate income individuals in the greater hartford connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.

Health
7
Christian Community Health Center

To provide high quality primary health care and related services to the community regardless of the ability to pay, in a manner which demonstrates in work and deed the love of Jesus Christ.

Philanthropy
8
Universal Community Health Center

The organization provides quality and accessible health care to underserved communties and a pateint centered model of care to empower communities towards wellness.

Health
9
Open Cities Health Center Inc

Open Cities Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) whose mission is to provide culturally competent primary and preventive healthcare services to a largely underserved population in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.

Health
10
Community First Health Centers

We provide high quality, patient centered health care that is respectful, compassionate and accessible to all members of our community.

Health
11
Community Health Center of Richmond Inc

The organization's mission is to sustain a vibrant, healthy and strong community through affordable, culturally competent, quality primary health care.

Health
12
Westside Family Health Center

Westside Family Health Center provides comprehensive, high quality, cost effective health care in an educational and supportive environment that empowers patients to take an assertive role in caring for their well-being through all stages…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montgomery Area Community Wellness Coalition; the most unlike its peers is Sankofa Community Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
16/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOME INC: $750,000 · OtherSOME INCHEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $750,000 · OtherHEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INCAIDS RESOURCE ALLIANCE INC: $749,899 · OtherAIDS RESOURCE ALLIANCE INCMary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc: $628,013 · OtherMary's Center for Maternal and Child Care IncOklahoma City Indian Clinic: $545,000 · OtherOklahoma City Indian ClinicHEALTHVISIONS MIDWEST INC: $544,249 · OtherHEALTHVISIONS MIDWEST INCCHARITABLE PHARMACY OF CENTRAL OHIO INC: $544,144 · OtherCHARITABLE PHARMACY OF CENTRAL OHIO INC+5 more: $445,921 · Other+5 moreCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $750,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDIC…GOOD NEWS CLINICS INC: $544,935 · HealthGOOD NEWS CLINICS INCMONTGOMERY AREA COMMUNITY WELLNESS COALITION: $544,288 · HealthMONTGOMERY AREA COMMUNITY WEL…CATHERINES HEALTH CENTER: $169,998 · HealthCATHERINES HEALTH CENTERASIAN HEALTH COALITION: $155,000 · HealthASIAN HEALTH COALITION+2 more: $100,000 · HealthLCH Health and Community Services: $750,000 · Human ServicesLCH Healt…CAMINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $545,000 · PhilanthropyMERCY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyCHESAPEAKE CHARITIES INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropySANKOFA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $50,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$4,957,226Health$2,264,221Human Services$750,000Philanthropy$645,000Arts & Culture$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLCH Health and Community Services: $750,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetSOME INC: $750,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $750,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetHEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $750,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetAIDS RESOURCE ALLIANCE INC: $749,899 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetMary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc: $628,013 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCAMINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $545,000 over 4y, 9.8% of budgetGOOD NEWS CLINICS INC: $544,935 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetMONTGOMERY AREA COMMUNITY WELLNESS COALITION: $544,288 over 4y, 17% of budgetHEALTHVISIONS MIDWEST INC: $544,249 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetCHARITABLE PHARMACY OF CENTRAL OHIO INC: $544,144 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetCATHERINES HEALTH CENTER: $169,998 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC: $85,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWESTMINSTER FREE CLINIC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetDr Arenia C Mallory Community Health Center Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMERCY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSANKOFA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $50,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE CHARITIES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Direct ReliefCA22.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Direct Relief · Americares Foundation Inc · National Association of Free and Charitable Clinics Inc · Heart to Heart International Inc · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization AstraZeneca Foundation (fka AstraZeneca Healthcare Foundation) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from AstraZeneca Foundation (fka AstraZeneca Healthcare Foundation). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Health Care for the Homeless Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to AstraZeneca Foundation (fka AstraZeneca Healthcare Foundation)?

Find your warmest path to AstraZeneca Foundation (fka AstraZeneca Healthcare Foundation) through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on AstraZeneca Foundation (fka AstraZeneca Healthcare Foundation)’s filings →

More from the funding graph