Skip to content
Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs

The mission of the association of maternal & child health programs is to protect and promote the optimal health of women, children, and families.

$836k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
20
States reached
$89k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$6.6MHuman Services$466kEducation$303kEmployment$172kFood & Nutrition$136kEnvironment$88kCommunity Improvement$69kCrime & Legal$49kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 27 grants below total $688,595, the rows itemized in this filing. The $836,046 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $147,451 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $515k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $149k
$18,750
Median grant
20
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$88,847
CAMDEN COALITION OF HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS$60,000
ELEPHANT CIRCLE$49,154
REACHUP INC$41,250
RESTORING OUR OWN THROUGH TRANSFORMATION (ROOTT)$38,450
HELUNA HEALTH$37,500
INSTITUTE OF WOMEN & ETHNIC STUDIES$35,790
MICHIGAN PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE$35,250
MAMATOTO VILLAGE$32,104
BALTIMORE HEALTHY START INC$30,000
MAYA ORGANIZATION$30,000
EVERTHRIVE ILLINOIS$26,324
THE BIRTHING HUT LLC$25,000
HEALTHY START INC$18,750
FAMILIES FIRST OF MONROE COUNTY INC$18,748
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HELLO NEIGHBOR: $15k → 11%MAMATOTO VILLAGE: $32k → 14%THE SOCIAL JUSTICE CENTER: $10k → 10%HANDS & VOICES: $31k → 8%SISTER SONG INC: $200k → 13%URBAN BABY BEGINNINGS: $19k → 19%MAYA ORGANIZATION: $30k → 11%MAMATOTO VILLIAGE: $13k → 14%HANDS & VOICES: $10k → 8%URBAN BABY BEGINNINGS: $11k → 19%HANDS & VOICES: $9k → 8%CHILDREN'S FORUM INC: $16k → 19%CHILDREN'S FORUM INC: $10k → 19%URBAN PERINATAL EDUCATION CENTER: $11k → 14%NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH QUALITY: $345k → 16%NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH QUALITY: $333k → 16%NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH QUALITY: $273k → 16%NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH QUALITY: $15k → 16%NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH QUALITY: $13k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.6M · 60 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

60 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 50 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
54

Total granted

$5.6M
$1.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+6%

Still filing today

53%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $315k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $850k · revenue +57%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR HEALTH POLICY DEVELOPMENT
    5× · 2017–2021 · $256k · revenue +25%
  • AO
    ASSOCIATION OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL HEALTH OFFICIALS
    4× · 2018–2021 · $224k · revenue +166%

Funded once

  • HD
    HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
    one grant, 2021 · $221k
  • SI
    SISTERSONG INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue +29%
  • ED
    E3 DIAGNOSTICS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $166k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Altarum Institute

Altarum is focused on improving the health of individuals with fewer financial resources and populations disenfranchised by the health care system. we drive impactful changes in four domains: 1) transform health service delivery - we work…

Science & Tech
2
Healthconnect One

Healthconnect one (hc one) is the national leader in advancing equitable, community-based, peer-to-peer support for pregnancy, birth, breastfeeding and early parenting. hc one realizes its mission by promoting health equity. we work to…

Health
3
National Perinatal Information Center

The national perinatal information center (npic) is dedicated to the improvement of perinatal health through comparative data analysis, program evaluation, health services research and professional continuing education.

Health
4
2020 Mom Policy Center for Maternal

The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…

Health
5
Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs

The mission of the association of maternal & child health programs is to protect and promote the optimal health of women, children, and families.

Public Benefit
6
Maryland Patient Safety Center Inc

To develop and implement strategies to improve the safety of patient care in maryland. mpsc unites stakeholders to champion patient safety, eliminate preventable harm, and accelerate improvements in safety quality across healthcare.

Health
7
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
8
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
9
National Nurse-Led Care Consortium

The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.

Health
10
Pacific Health Research & Education Institute

See schedule ophrei conducts health research and education that improves the health and well-being of veterans and all people in hawaii, central california, the pacific region, and throughout the u.s. driven by the values of excellence and…

—
11
New Mexico Perinatal Collaborative

The mission of the new mexico perinatal collaborative is to convene stakeholders to achieve health equity through the promotion of evidence- based reproductive and perinatal health practices that: increase collaboration with communities…

—
12
Alliancechicago

Alliancechicago is the continuation of an existing effort to bring together charitable federally qualified health centers (fqhcs) to collaboratively pursue their charitable missions by better serving their disadvantaged patients with…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Everthrive Illinois; the most unlike its peers is Urban Baby Beginnings dba Ubb. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 132 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
67/70
Grantees still filing
35/70
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTER FOR HEALTH POLICY DEVELOPMENT: $255,611 · OtherCENTER FOR HEALTH POLICY DEVELOPMENTUTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $227,675 · OtherUTAH STATE UNIVERSITYHAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: $221,495 · OtherHAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $171,549 · OtherE3 DIAGNOSTICS INC: $165,890 · OtherGeorgia Department of Public Health: $161,251 · OtherNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $155,657 · Other+75 more: $2,650,092 · Other+75 morePARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC: $850,000 · HealthPARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONA…ASSOCIATION OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL HEALTH OFFICIALS: $224,000 · HealthASSOCIATION OF STATE AND TE…GREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITIATIVE INC: $112,000 · HealthGREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITI…NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE ALCOHOL AND DRUG AGENCY DIRECTORS INC: $102,418 · HealthNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STA…CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $98,126 · HealthUNITED BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $73,159 · HealthGENETIC ALLIANCE INC: $69,685 · HealthCamden Coalition Inc: $67,500 · Health+17 more: $309,736 · Health+17 moreNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH QUALITY INC: $979,360 · Human ServicesNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR …SISTERSONG INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesSISTERSONG INCFAMILY VOICES: $180,288 · Human ServicesFAMILY VOICES+9 more: $264,590 · Human Services+9 moreGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $64,332 · EducationUNITED STATES BREASTFEEDING COMMITTEE INC: $48,060 · EducationSMALL WORLD YOGA INC: $15,133 · EducationTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION: $12,904 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF UTAH RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $11,491 · EducationTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $117,138 · PhilanthropyAdvocacy Without Borders: $5,100 · PhilanthropyTHE RECONCILIATION CENTER INC: $50,000 · Civil RightsHEART AND SOL COLLECTIVE: $12,000 · Civil RightsYOUNG INVINCIBLES: $10,000 · Civil RightsFAMILIES FIRST OF MONROE COUNTY INC: $24,998 · Community ImprovementPHILADELPHIA CITY FUND INC: $15,000 · Community ImprovementWYOMING PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION INC: $9,960 · Community Improvement
Other$4,009,220Health$1,906,624Human Services$1,624,238Education$151,920Philanthropy$122,238Civil Rights$72,000Community Improvement$49,958

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH QUALITY INC: $979,360 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetPARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC: $850,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetCENTER FOR HEALTH POLICY DEVELOPMENT: $255,611 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetASSOCIATION OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL HEALTH OFFICIALS: $224,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSISTERSONG INC: $200,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFAMILY VOICES: $180,288 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $171,549 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $155,657 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORIES INC: $122,025 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $117,138 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITIATIVE INC: $112,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE ALCOHOL AND DRUG AGENCY DIRECTORS INC: $102,418 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $98,126 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $73,159 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE EAR FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA: $72,600 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetGENETIC ALLIANCE INC: $69,685 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCamden Coalition Inc: $67,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $64,332 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREACHUP Inc: $60,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY AND CITY HEALTH OFFICALS: $55,877 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RECONCILIATION CENTER INC: $50,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetHands and Voices of Georgia Inc: $50,000 over 3y, 64% of budgetELEPHANT CIRCLE: $49,154 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED STATES BREASTFEEDING COMMITTEE INC: $48,060 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetInstitute of Women & Ethnic Studies: $47,720 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUSA Parent to Parent: $47,262 over 1y, 31% of budgetEVERTHRIVE ILLINOIS: $45,198 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAMATOTO VILLAGE INC: $44,946 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetRestoring Our Own Through Transformation: $38,450 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetMICHIGAN PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE: $35,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPublic Health Institute: $30,321 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYA ORGANIZATION: $30,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetBALTIMORE HEALTHY START INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUrban Baby Beginnings dba UBB: $30,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetEMBOLDEN WI INC: $26,300 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS: $26,201 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST LOUISIANA AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER FOUNDATION: $26,039 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S FORUM INC: $26,007 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCommonwealth Health Corporation Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES FIRST OF MONROE COUNTY INC: $24,998 over 2y, 11% of budgetALABAMA PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC: $22,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetSIGNAL CENTERS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHY START INC: $18,750 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSTART EARLY: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSMALL WORLD YOGA INC: $15,133 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetPHILADELPHIA CITY FUND INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHELLO NEIGHBOR: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH QUALITY INC ↗
  • Who funds PARENTS AS TEACHERS NATIONAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR HEALTH POLICY DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF STATE AND TERRITORIAL HEALTH OFFICIALS ↗
  • Who funds SISTERSONG INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY VOICES ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREEN & HEALTHY HOMES INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE ALCOHOL AND DRUG AGENCY DIRECTORS INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EAR FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds GENETIC ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Camden Coalition Inc ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds REACHUP Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY AND CITY HEALTH OFFICALS ↗
  • Who funds THE RECONCILIATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Hands and Voices of Georgia Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Association of State …Association of Public…Council of State and …National Foundation f…Investor Protection T…North American Associ…The Pew Charitable Tr…National Network of P…Groundswell FundJohns Hopkins Univers…National Fish and Wil…Recreational Boating …
Association of State and Territorial Health OfficialsVA44.3× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Association of State and Territorial Health Officials · Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc · Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Inc · National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc · Investor Protection Trust · North American Association of Central Cancer Registries · The Pew Charitable Trusts · National Network of Public Health Institutes Inc · Groundswell Fund · Johns Hopkins University · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Green & Healthy Homes Initiative Inc: 100% of income from government
  • National Institute for Children's Health Quality Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Postpartum Support International: 43% of income from government
  • Baltimore Healthy Start Inc: 43% of income from government
  • Family Voices: 39% of income from government
  • Trenton Health Team Inc: 31% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Reachup Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • Connecticut Children's Medical Center: 5% of income from government
  • The University of Vermont Medical Center: 1% of income from government
  • Children's Forum Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Genetic Alliance Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 132 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home