· Private foundation
Arbor Dog Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k27 grants · $102k
- $10k–50k26 grants · $312k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS LATIN SCHOOL OF MARYLAND INC | $23,000 |
| FRIENDS OF CLIFTON MANSION | $20,000 |
| IRVINE NATURE CENTER | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES | $15,000 |
| CYLBURN ARBORETUM ASSOC | $14,000 |
| MSGR ODWYER RETREAT HOUSE | $12,500 |
| BALTIMORE EDUCATIONAL SCHOOLARSHIP | $12,500 |
| FUND FOR EDUCATIONAL EXCELLENCE | $12,000 |
| ST JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $12,000 |
| GIRLS EMPOWERMENT MISSION GEM | $11,000 |
| HELPING UP MISSION OF BALTIMORE CIT | $10,000 |
| BALTIMORE TREE TRUST INC | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| I AM MENTALITY YOUTH MALE EMPOWERME | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $79k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
45 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $189k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFRIENDS OF CLIFTON MANSION INC3× · 2021–2024 · $65k · revenue +227% · 42% of their budget
- CBCHESAPEAKE BAY OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL INC2× · 2022–2023 · $60k · revenue +37%
- INIRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC3× · 2022–2024 · $38k · revenue +61%
Funded once
- NDNOTRE DAME PREPARATORY SCHOOLone grant, 2023 · $32k
- WPWATERFRONT PARTNERSHIP OF BALTIMORE INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +27%
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To nurture a love of learning in a small family-like environment by providing an extraordinary and proven montessori public school experience for families in baltimore city.
As a statewide resource center, the school provides outreach, educational and residential services for students to reach their fullest potential by preparing them to be as successful, independent, and well-rounded contributing members of…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Promote religious, charitable, and educational interests of its members and constituent monthly meetings.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Nonprofit organization that provides educational programs and therapeutic services that invest in the abilities of neurodivergent children and young adults with unique learning needs including special education.
Baltimore Green Space is a land trust that partners with communities to preserve and support community gardens , forest patches , pocket parks , and other community-managed spaces.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Clifton Mansion Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE BOYS' LATIN SCHOOL OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CLIFTON MANSION INC ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds IRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Turnaround Tuesday Inc ↗
- Who funds THREAD INC ↗
- Who funds THE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC ↗
- Who funds LIFEBRIDGE CENTER FOR HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds CAMBRIDGE SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds WATERFRONT PARTNERSHIP OF BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds ROLAND PARK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST PAUL'S SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE CURRICULUM PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT PNEUMA INC ↗
- Who funds FIRST FRUITS FARM INC ↗
- Who funds Mentoring Mentors Inc ↗
- Who funds GREEN STREET ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds SHEPPARD PRATT HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING UP MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds REBUILD METRO INC ↗
- Who funds THE ODYSSEY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds CIVIC WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds I AM MENTALITY INC ↗
- Who funds CYLBURN ARBORETUM FRIENDS INC ↗
- Who funds BALTIMORE TREE TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds WESTMINSTER RESCUE MISSION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · Brown Advisory Charitable Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · The Marion I & Henry J Knott Foundation Inc · Clayton Baker Trust · T Rowe Price Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Arbor Dog Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Baltimore Tree Trust Inc — 100% of income from government
- Autism Society of Maryland Inc — 67% of income from government
- Civic Works Inc — 63% of income from government
- Talmar Inc — 46% of income from government
- Parks and People Inc — 43% of income from government
- Center for Urban Families Inc — 36% of income from government
- Pride of Baltimore Inc — 30% of income from government
- First Fruits Farm Inc — 26% of income from government
- Turnaround Inc — 18% of income from government
- Baltimore Corps Inc — 15% of income from government
- Thread Inc — 12% of income from government
- Center Stage Associates Inc — 7% of income from government
- Helping Up Mission Inc — 6% of income from government
- Rebuild Metro Inc — 5% of income from government
- Northwest Hospital Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Franciscan Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Waterfront Partnership of Baltimore Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc — 1% of income from government
- Fund for Educational Excellence Inc — 1% of income from government
- Sheppard Pratt Health System Inc — 0% of income from government
- Our Sisters School — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Arbor Dog Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Arbor Dog Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.