· Private foundation
Antioch Community Foundation Attn Keith Archuleta
Provide funds to qualifying organizations that support integrated programs for antioch children in the areas of academics, fine arts and athletics, at-risk youth in the areas of counseling, mentoring and health services & other programs that support antioch residents.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k54 grants · $197k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $37k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PEOPLE WHO CARE CHILDREN ASSOCIATION | $15,000 |
| BRIDGE BUILDERS TO THE NEW GENERATION | $12,000 |
| COUNSELING OPTIONS AND PARENT EDUCATION (COPE) | $10,000 |
| BIOTECH PARTNERS | $9,500 |
| HIJAS DEL CAMPO | $9,500 |
| VILLAGE KEEPERS | $9,000 |
| DELTA BAY IMPACT | $9,000 |
| ANTIOCH ROTARY CLUB | $8,500 |
| RR TRANSITIONAL HOUSING | $8,000 |
| PARENT OF AFRICAN AMERICAN COLLABORATIVE TEAM | $7,000 |
| DIABLO BALLET | $7,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,500 |
| GENESIS CHURCH | $6,000 |
| JOHN MUIR LAND TRUST | $6,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
37 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $89k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RCRUAH COMMUNITY OUTREACH4× · 2022–2025 · $32k · revenue +112%
- BBBRIDGE BUILDERS TO THE NEW GENERATION3× · 2023–2025 · $27k · revenue +93%
- MLMindful Life Project4× · 2022–2025 · $23k · revenue +27%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $8k
- YIYOUTH INTERVENTION NETWORKone grant, 2017 · $5k
- CCContra Costa Interfaith Transitional Housing Incgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +62%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
For more than 70 years, East Bay Agency for Children continues to improve the well-being of children, youth and families by reducing the impact of trauma and social inequalities.
To ignite the potential of youth today for vibrant communities tomorrow. We offer positive experiences, environments and relationships and a foundation for youth to grow, learn and develop into happy, self-sufficient young adults.
Comprehensive Family Service System.
We provide education, counseling, and intervention programs to support individuals and families facing substance abuse, behavioral, and mental health challenges. Our mission is to empower youth and fimilies with the skills, resources, and…
To provide each student or participant with the access, skills, and opportunities needed to become successful and productive members of society, and to encourage them to have some fun along the way. The Organization offers support and…
Provides culturally responsive therapy, peer to peer support groups, community outreach services, and facilitated workshops in Alameda County with the aim to enhance the mental health and overall well-being of the LGBTQIA+ and QTBIPOC…
To provide services to families and to youth with emotional disturbance in order to enable these youth to maintain family and community relationships.
Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.
Through coaching and group facilitation, leaders of color heal from racism, develop skills to identify & interrupt racism in personal leadership, organizational practices & policies, and produce antiracist solutions in partnership with…
Resources and Community Advocacy. Serving low income youth and families in the community. Providing culturally competent and sensitivie programing based on based on the needs and resources available in Santa Clara County.
Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Contra Costa Family Justice Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Rr Transitional Housing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 14. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 24% of your grantees by number, and just 18% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Biotech Partners ↗
- Who funds People Who Care Children's Association ↗
- Who funds RUAH COMMUNITY OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE BUILDERS TO THE NEW GENERATION ↗
- Who funds Mindful Life Project ↗
- Who funds COPE Family Support Center Inc ↗
- Who funds DIABLO BALLET ↗
- Who funds Village Community Resource Center ↗
- Who funds RR TRANSITIONAL HOUSING ↗
- Who funds HIJAS DEL CAMPO ↗
- Who funds ANTIOCH ROTARY CLUB ↗
- Who funds John Muir Land Trust prev Muir Heritage Land Trust ↗
- Who funds CELEBRATE ANTIOCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CONTRA COSTA FAMILY JUSTICE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds WHITE PONY EXPRESS ↗
- Who funds Love Never Fails Inc ↗
- Who funds DELTA BAY IMPACT ↗
- Who funds Grace Arms of Antioch ↗
- Who funds Beat the Streets Inc ↗
- Who funds Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center ↗
- Who funds Newberrys BLOCK ↗
- Who funds LOAVES AND FISHES ↗
- Who funds NAMI Contra Costa ↗
- Who funds Families Empowered and Transformed - FEAT ↗
- Who funds MONUMENT IMPACT ↗
- Who funds LA CONCORDIA WELLNESS CENTER ↗
- Who funds IMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dean and Margaret Lesher Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · John Muirmt Diablo Community Health Fund · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Contra Costa Regional Health Foundation · Justice Justice Foundation · John Muir Health · Richmond Community Foundation · Lowell Berry Foundation · Tipping Point Community · The San Francisco Foundation · Bernard E & Alba Witkin Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Antioch Community Foundation Attn Keith Archuleta funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Antioch Community Foundation Attn Keith Archuleta?
Find your warmest path to Antioch Community Foundation Attn Keith Archuleta through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.