How much did ANTIOCH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION grant in FY2023?

ANTIOCH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION reported 35 grants totaling $128,000 in its FY2023 IRS filing.

Where is ANTIOCH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION based?

ANTIOCH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is based in CA.

ANTIOCH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Private foundation

ANTIOCH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

Provide funds to qualifying organizations that support programs and services for children, youth, and seniors; enhance economic security and health for residents; support antioch parks and recreation programs for families; and help improve the overall quality of life for the antioch community.

$128k

Granted FY2023

Grants

Communities

$12k

Largest

01What you fund

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 48% of ANTIOCH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

—

2020

—

2022

businessaging

2023

deltavillage

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k30 grants · $75k
$10k–50k5 grants · $53k

$1,500

Median grant

States reached

$1.1M

Total assets

Largest grants

VILLAGE KEEPERS$11,750
MINDFUL LIFE PROJECT$11,000
PEOPLE WHO CARE CHILDREN ASSOCIATION$10,000
BIOTECH PARTNERS$10,000
VILLAGE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER$10,000
FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER$7,500
COUNSELING OPTIONS AND PARENT EDUCATION (COPE)$7,500
RCF CONNECTS-MOBILITY$7,500
DIABLO BALLET$6,250
LOVE NEVER FAILS$6,000
BRIDGE BUILDERS TO THE NEW GENERATION$5,000
NEWBERRY'S BLOCK$3,000
ANTIOCH ROTARY CLUB$3,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$2,500
RR TRANSITIONAL HOUSING$2,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$139k · 18 repeat orgs$96k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$139k

$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+101%

+207%

Still filing today

78%

23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BP
BIOTECH PARTNERS
2× · 2019–2023 · $25k · revenue +67%
VK
VILLAGE KEEPERS
2× · 2022–2023 · $14k · revenue +734%
ML
MINDFUL LIFE PROJECT
2× · 2022–2023 · $12k · revenue +344%

Funded once

CO
CITY OF ANTIOCH
one grant, 2022 · $16k
AH
ANTIOCH HISTORICAL SOCIETY SPORTS LEGENDS
one grant, 2022 · $2k
RE
RENAISSANCE ENT-BIZ TRAINING
one grant, 2022 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Contra Costa Crisis Center

The Contra Costa Crisis Center's mission is to keep people in Contra Costa County, California alive and safe, help them through crises, and connect them with culturally relevant resources in the community.

Health

Refugee & Immigrant Transitions

Our mission is to welcome and partner with those who have sought refuge, employing strengths-based educational approaches and community supports so they may thrive in our shared communities.

Youth Development

Loaves and Fishes of Contra Costa

The mission of Loaves and Fishes of Contra Costa is to provide community based food programs and partner services that focus on basic needs. We Nourish Lives!

—

People with Disabilities Succeeding

Community support for Developmentally Disabled Adults, with a main emphasis on helping people to obtain and maintain real jobs in local businesses.

Employment

Rebuilding Together East Bay-North

We repair homes for low-income seniors, veterans, and adults with disabilities and the community facilities that serve them.

Housing & Shelter

Community Housing Sonoma County

Community Housing Sonoma County creates supportive housing communities for people living with disabling conditions, especially veterans.

Housing & Shelter

Challenge Success

Challenge Success partners with schools, families, and communities to embrace a broad definition of success and implement research-based strategies that promote student well-being and engagement with learning.

Education

California Community Action Partnership

Provide technical assistance to antipoverty organizations and member agencies enabling these agencies to acquire federal, state, and private funds.

Human Services

Empower Work Inc

To create healthy, equitable workplaces where people are valued, supported, and empowered in ways that support their economic mobility, emotional well-being, and career success through (1) Direct Service, (2) Training and Community, and 3)…

Employment

California Partnership Safe Communities

CPSC works with communities to reduce shootings, improve life outcomes for those at highest risk of violence, and build trust between police and communities affected by violence. In each city where we work, CPSC engages a broad…

—

Community Action of Napa Valley

To increase the self-determination and self-sufficiency of individuals and families who are in need.

Human Services

Nami Contra Costa

Providing non clinical supports to those impacted by mental illness through education, outreach, and advocacy.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Share Community and the most unlike its peers is Rr Transitional Housing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/28

the rest of the field

11%

661/5,996

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

27/28

Grantees still filing

22/28

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$123,404Education$36,750Human Services$20,000Health$15,000Religion$13,750Youth Development$13,000Arts & Culture$12,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dean and Margaret Lesher FoundationCA26.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dean and Margaret Lesher Foundation · John Muirmt Diablo Community · East Bay Community Foundation · Justice Justice Foundation · Richmond Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The San Francisco Foundation · John Muir Health · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Tipping Point Community · Harry and Helen Tassell Family · Leo Fontana Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ANTIOCH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CELEBRATE ANTIOCH FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 461820212 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CELEBRATE ANTIOCH FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 14% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Antioch Community Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Antioch Community Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ANTIOCH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Antioch Community Foundation?

More from the funding graph

ANTIOCH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Antioch Community Foundation?

More from the funding graph