Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

American Hospital Association

To advance the health of all individuals and communities.

$12M
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$8.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$24MPublic Benefit$2.8MCivil Rights$412kArts & Culture$392kScience & Tech$310kPublic Safety & Disaster$303kInternational$250kCommunity Improvement$152kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 23 grants below total $11,651,235 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $11,948,975 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $297,740 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $276k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $170k
  • $250k+5 grants · $11M
$27,375
Median grant
15
States reached
$435M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE$8,000,000
AONL FOUNDATION FOR NURSING LEADERSHIP RESEARCH AND EDUCATION$1,200,000
MAJORITY FORWARD$1,000,000
ONE NATION$500,000
NEWHEIGHTS FOR AMERICA$500,000
HEALTHCARE WORKFORCE COALITION$70,000
NORTH CAROLINA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$50,000
DEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION$50,000
NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCATION$45,000
ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROGRAMS IN HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (AUPHA)$30,000
COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT EDUCATION (CAHME)$27,500
NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE LEADERSHIP$27,375
B'NAI B'RITH$25,000
ALABAMA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION$25,000
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF INSURANCE LEGISLATORS$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE: $40k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $35k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $25k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $25k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $25k → 17%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
NJ
CA
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$24M · 39 repeat orgs$3.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

39 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
25

Total granted

$24M
$912k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+19%

Still filing today

90%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCommunity ImprovementEducationPublic BenefitPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    COALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE
    4× · 2018–2024 · $12M · revenue +917% · 69% of their budget
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR DIVERSITY AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $4.3M · revenue +48% · 83% of their budget
  • CF
    CAMPAIGN FOR SUSTAINABLE RX PRICING
    4× · 2020–2023 · $410k · revenue +180%

Funded once

  • WT
    WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $375k · revenue +29%
  • HM
    HOUSE MAJORITY FORWARDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +229%
  • NA
    NCHC ACTION FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · 50% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Coalition On Health Care

The mission of the national coalition on health care (nchc) is to support research and analysis, develop and promote policy solutions, build consensus, and engage the public in order to ensure that america has a high quality health system…

Health
2
American Hospital Association

To advance the health of all individuals and communities. The AHA leads, represents and serves hospitals, health systems and other related organizations that are accountable to the community and committed to equitable care and health…

—
3
National Alliance for Care At Home

The association represents and advocates for home health agencies, hospices, and home care providers across the united states. it advances high quality, accessible home based care through federal and regulatory advocacy, professional…

—
4
American College Health Association

The american college health association (acha) serves as the principal leadership organization for advancing the health of college students and campus communities through advocacy, education, and research.

Health
5
National Association for Healthcare Quality

To prepare individuals and organizations to lead, inspire, and advance healthcare quality and safety across the continuum.

Health
6
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
7
American Health Law Association

The mission of the american health law association is to deliver authoritative educational content and serve as a professional home for all who engage with health law.

—
8
Minnesota Hospital Association

Advance the health of individuals and communities through leadership, advocacy and collaboration on behalf of minnesota hospitals and health systems. vision: minnesotans are healthy and have access to the right care at the right time in…

Community Improvement
9
Integrated Healthcare Association

Iha's mission is to bring the healthcare community together to solve industry-wide challenges that stand in the way of high-value care. as a non-profit industry association, we use objective data, our decades of expertise, and our unique…

—
10
Association of Academic Health Centers Inc

The association of academic health centers (aahc) seeks to improve the nation's health care system by mobilizing and enhancing the strengths and resources of the academic health center enterprise in health professions, education, patient…

—
11
Coalition for Healthcare Communication Inc

The coalition for healthcare communication, inc. ("chc") is an organization that promotes the free exchange of accurate, credible scientific and medical information (see schedule o).

—
12
National Alliance of Healthcare Purchaser Coalitions Inc

To accelerate the nation's progress towards safe, efficient, high - quality health care and the improved health status of the american population.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Carolina Healthcare Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mha Health Research and Educational Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Policy Research and AdvocacyDomestic Violence ServicesJewish Community Organizati…Community FoundationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr18%16%10–20yr18%23%20–35yr16%21%35–55yr15%34%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr18%14%10–20yr18%61%20–35yr16%4%35–55yr15%18%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/77
the rest of the field
12%
1,600/12,924

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
65/69
Grantees still filing
36/69
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE — $11,800,000 · HealthCOALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CAREHealth Research and Educational Trust — $2,160,345 · HealthHealth Research and Educational TrustAONL FOUNDATION FOR NURSING LEADERSHIP RESEARCH AND EDUCATION — $1,200,000 · HealthAONL FOUNDATION FOR NURSING LEADERSHIP RESEARCH AND EDUCATION+20 more — $1,280,375 · Health+20 moreINSTITUTE FOR DIVERSITY AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT INC — $4,342,156 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR DIVERSITY AND HEALTH MA…PARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE FUTURE INC — $1,500,000 · OtherPARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE…MAJORITY FORWARD — $1,000,000 · OtherMAJORITY FORWARDNew Heights for America — $500,000 · OtherNew Heights for America+39 more — $1,973,270 · Other+39 moreONE NATION — $1,000,000 · Public Benefit+2 more — $20,500 · Public BenefitCAMPAIGN FOR SUSTAINABLE RX PRICING — $410,000 · Community ImprovementHOUSE MAJORITY FORWARD — $100,000 · Community Improvement+2 more — $19,500 · Community ImprovementWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $375,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FIRE PROTECTION RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $287,500 · Public Safety & DisasterUkrainian Resistance Foundation — $25,000 · Public Safety & DisasterNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $310,000 · Science & Tech
Health$16,440,720Other$9,315,426Public Benefit$1,020,500Community Improvement$529,500Arts & Culture$375,000Public Safety & Disaster$312,500Science & Tech$310,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE — $11,800,000 over 4y, 69% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR DIVERSITY AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT INC — $4,342,156 over 4y, 83% of budgetHealth Research and Educational Trust — $2,160,345 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE FUTURE INC — $1,500,000 over 3y, 9.4% of budgetAONL FOUNDATION FOR NURSING LEADERSHIP RESEARCH AND EDUCATION — $1,200,000 over 1y, 78% of budgetMAJORITY FORWARD — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetONE NATION — $1,000,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNew Heights for America — $500,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCoalition To Transform Advanced Car — $500,000 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetCAMPAIGN FOR SUSTAINABLE RX PRICING — $410,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $375,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $310,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FIRE PROTECTION RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $287,500 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetCommission on Accreditation of Healthcare Management Education — $206,500 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetUNIDOSUS — $187,663 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC — $150,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetChamber of Commerce of the USA — $139,583 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetB NAI B RITH — $135,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CONGRESSIONAL INSTITUTE INC — $103,125 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetHOUSE MAJORITY FORWARD — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNCHC ACTION FUND — $100,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetFLORIDA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetAlliance for Health Policy — $90,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetBLUFORD HEALTHCARE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE — $80,000 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE LEADERSHIP — $76,875 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR HEALTH DESIGN INC — $75,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUST — $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC — $74,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHEALTHCARE WORKFORCE COALITION — $70,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH SERVICES EXECUTIVES — $60,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetPROJECT PERFECT WORLD FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROGRAMS IN HEALTH ADMINISTRATION — $60,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTexas Hospital Association — $55,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES — $45,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDAVID A WINSTON HEALTH POLICY FELLOWSHIP — $35,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetIOWA HOSPITAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetUNITED HOSPITAL FUND OF NEW YORK — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL QUALITY FORUM — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL HOSPICE FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetALABAMA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUkrainian Resistance Foundation — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNational Council of Insurance Legislators — $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetOREGON ASSOCIATION OF HOSPITALS & HEALTH SYSTEMS — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLOUISIANA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMHA HEALTH RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pharmaceutical Resear…Federation of America…Cedars-Sinai Medical …AARPKaiser Foundation Hea…American Property Cas…American Medical Asso…Edison Electric Insti…Biotechnology Innovat…The Commonwealth FundCalifornia Healthcare…American Health Care …
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of AmericaDC21.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Federation of American Hospitals · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · AARP · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc · American Property Casualty Insurance Association · American Medical Association · Edison Electric Institute Inc · Biotechnology Innovation Organization · The Commonwealth Fund · California Healthcare Foundation · American Health Care Association

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Hospital Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 50%
  • The Fire Protection Research Foundation — 50% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines