Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

American Medical Association

To further the interests of the medical profession by promoting the art and science of medicine and the betterment of public health.

$8.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
142
Grants FY2024still arriving
35
States reached
$375k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$30MEducation$19MEmployment$2.8MScience & Tech$1.2MPublic Safety & Disaster$908kCommunity Improvement$520kEnvironment$244kCivil Rights$160kOther$0
02FY2024 · 142 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 142 grants below total $7,278,681 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $8,605,592 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,326,911 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k82 grants · $1.9M
  • $50k–250k45 grants · $3.7M
  • $250k+5 grants · $1.6M
$30,000
Median grant
35
States reached
$1.5B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY$375,000
ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSORS OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS$375,000
MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$292,500
RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$280,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$275,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$180,000
OREGON HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY$180,000
MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER$180,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL$180,000
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$180,000
MAINEHEALTH$180,000
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY$180,000
PARTNERS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC$180,000
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY INC$131,003
INNOVATION DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $215k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICES: $145k → 18%ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN MEDICAL STUDENT ASSOCIATION: $20k → 9%SAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICES: $50k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of American Medical Association’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

American Medical Associationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$51M · 131 repeat orgs$4.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

131 repeat relationships — 82 still active in FY2024, 49 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

131
72

Total granted

$51M
$3.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+22%

Still filing today

75%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $807k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsScience & TechPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    New York University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +76%
  • Vanderbilt University
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +74%
  • MM
    MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • AM
    AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ALLIANCE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $821k · revenue -2%
  • AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $450k · revenue -22%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR HEALTHY FLORIDIANS
    one grant, 2017 · $150k · revenue -86%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association of Physicists in Medicine

Advancing medicine through excellence in the science, education and professional practice of medical physics. the mission is carried out through driving scientific and clinical innovation in medical physics to improve human health,…

Science & Tech
2
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
3
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
4
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
5
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
6
University of Maryland Surgical Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
7
Massachusetts Medical Society

To advance medical knowledge, to develop and maintain the highest professional and ethical standards of medical practice and health care, and to promote medical institutions formed on liberal principles for the health, benefit, and welfare…

—
8
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
9
University of Maryland Oncology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
10
University of Maryland Obstetrical Andgynecological Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
11
University of Maryland Eye Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meharry Medical College and the most unlike its peers is Rayos Contra Cancer. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Women & Girls Leadership De…Lgbtq+ Community SupportMilitary Veterans SupportPregnancy Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%44%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%44%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.4%1/240
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,325

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

201 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 201 of the 240 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
197/201
Grantees still filing
138/201
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PCPI FOUNDATION — $6,358,000 · OtherPCPI FOUNDATIONOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY — $2,319,000 · OtherOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITYPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY — $2,293,863 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $1,300,000 · OtherUniversity of North Dakota-College of Business & Public Admin — $980,000 · Other+92 more — $14,383,023 · Other+92 moreNew York University — $2,580,914 · EducationNew York UniversityVanderbilt University — $2,436,858 · EducationVanderbilt UniversityJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $1,954,955 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $1,732,500 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE…MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $1,017,573 · EducationMOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINERegenstrief Institute Inc — $1,010,000 · EducationRegenstrief Institute IncTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $570,000 · Education+35 more — $3,280,539 · Education+35 moreMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER — $1,985,000 · HealthMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTE…MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $1,925,000 · HealthMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INC…MaineHealth Services — $1,925,000 · HealthMaineHealth ServicesASSOCIATION OF PROFESSORS OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS — $1,925,000 · HealthASSOCIATION OF PROFESSOR…Rush University Medical Center — $838,530 · HealthRush University Medical …+40 more — $4,189,870 · Health+40 moreBROWN UNIVERSITY — $389,000 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL HISPANIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION — $235,000 · Community ImprovementROCK HEALTH FOUNDATION — $185,000 · Community ImprovementTEXAS MEDICAL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION — $150,000 · Community ImprovementWOMEN BUSINESS LEADERS OF THE US HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY FOUNDATION (WBL) — $100,000 · Community ImprovementNational Association of ACOS Inc — $55,000 · Community ImprovementAMERICAN SOCIETY OF MEDICAL ASSOCIATION COUNSEL — $40,000 · Community Improvement+1 more — $25,000 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $1,006,000 · Science & TechSLING HEALTH — $52,407 · Science & TechNEW VOICES FOUNDATION — $390,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $150,000 · PhilanthropyHOPEWELL FUND — $40,000 · PhilanthropyThe Pew Charitable Trusts — $30,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $450,000 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · International
Other$27,633,886Education$14,583,339Health$12,788,400Community Improvement$1,179,000Science & Tech$1,058,407Philanthropy$610,000International$475,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPCPI FOUNDATION — $6,358,000 over 4y, 66% of budgetNew York University — $2,580,914 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University — $2,436,858 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER — $1,985,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $1,954,955 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $1,925,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMaineHealth Services — $1,925,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetASSOCIATION OF PROFESSORS OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS — $1,925,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $1,732,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $1,017,573 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRegenstrief Institute Inc — $1,010,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $1,006,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetINNOVATION DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC — $863,500 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetRush University Medical Center — $838,530 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $570,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE FUTURE INC — $500,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetRESEARCHAMERICA — $480,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetYale University — $464,864 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $450,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL SOCIETY — $446,400 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetALLIANCECHICAGO — $404,494 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF MEDICAL SOCIETY EXECUTIVES — $400,000 over 8y, 21% of budgetNEW VOICES FOUNDATION — $390,000 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $389,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $362,970 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNational Medical Association — $335,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI PHYSICIANS INC — $272,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES — $260,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION — $259,000 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetKAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS — $250,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL HISPANIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION — $235,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER PHYSICIANS — $210,000 over 4y, 77% of budgetSAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICES — $195,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN PHYSICIANS INC — $190,000 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetROCK HEALTH FOUNDATION — $185,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $178,517 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC — $175,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA T Still University of Health Sciences — $175,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDTECH COLOR — $175,000 over 4y, 10% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $175,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $174,875 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAlliance for Health Policy — $170,000 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $168,122 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $165,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL HEALTH IT COLLABORATIVE FOR THE UNDERSERV — $160,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $154,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN STATE MEDICAL SOCIETY — $150,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR HEALTHY FLORIDIANS — $150,000 over 1y, 13% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PCPI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds MaineHealth Services ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSORS OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds Regenstrief Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds INNOVATION DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE FUTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds RESEARCHAMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Yale University ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA MEDICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCECHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF MEDICAL SOCIETY EXECUTIVES ↗
  • Who funds NEW VOICES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds National Medical Association ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI PHYSICIANS INC ↗
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pharmaceutical Resear…AARPAssociation of Americ…The Commonwealth FundCalifornia Healthcare…American Heart Associ…Washington UniversityAmerican Cancer Socie…The Children's Hospit…Johns Hopkins Univers…Mayo ClinicCystic Fibrosis Found…
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of AmericaDC30.2× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · AARP · Association of American Medical Colleges · The Commonwealth Fund · California Healthcare Foundation · American Heart Association Inc · Washington University · American Cancer Society Inc · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · Johns Hopkins University · Mayo Clinic · Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization American Medical Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine — 100% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • Medstar Health Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • Vermont Medical Society — 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
  • American Society of Addiction Medicine — 9% of income from government
  • Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • Masschallenge Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Christiana Care Health Services Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Medical Society of New Jersey — 0% of income from government
  • Samaritan Health Services — 0% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Institute for Healthcare Improvement — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 240 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home