Skip to content
American Hospital Association at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

American Hospital Association

To advance the health of all individuals and communities.

$12M
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$8.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$24MPublic Benefit$2.8MCivil Rights$412kArts & Culture$392kScience & Tech$310kPublic Safety & Disaster$303kInternational$250kCommunity Improvement$152kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 23 grants below total $11,651,235, the rows itemized in this filing. The $11,948,975 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $297,740 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $276k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $170k
  • $250k+5 grants · $11M
$27,375
Median grant
15
States reached
$435M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE$8,000,000
AONL FOUNDATION FOR NURSING LEADERSHIP RESEARCH AND EDUCATION$1,200,000
MAJORITY FORWARD$1,000,000
ONE NATION$500,000
NEWHEIGHTS FOR AMERICA$500,000
HEALTHCARE WORKFORCE COALITION$70,000
NORTH CAROLINA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$50,000
DEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION$50,000
NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCATION$45,000
ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROGRAMS IN HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (AUPHA)$30,000
COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT EDUCATION (CAHME)$27,500
NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE LEADERSHIP$27,375
B'NAI B'RITH$25,000
ALABAMA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION$25,000
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF INSURANCE LEGISLATORS$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE: $40k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $35k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $25k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $25k → 17%NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $25k → 17%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
NJ
CA
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24M · 39 repeat orgs$3.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
25

Total granted

$24M
$912k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+19%

Still filing today

90%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthCommunity ImprovementEducationPublic BenefitPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    COALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE
    4× · 2018–2024 · $12M · revenue +917% · 69% of their budget
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR DIVERSITY AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $4.3M · revenue +48% · 83% of their budget
  • CF
    CAMPAIGN FOR SUSTAINABLE RX PRICING
    4× · 2020–2023 · $410k · revenue +180%

Funded once

  • WT
    WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $375k · revenue +29%
  • NA
    NCHC ACTION FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · 50% of their budget
  • HM
    HOUSE MAJORITY FORWARDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +229%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Coalition On Health Care

The mission of the national coalition on health care (nchc) is to support research and analysis, develop and promote policy solutions, build consensus, and engage the public in order to ensure that america has a high quality health system…

Health
2
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
3
American Hospital Association

To advance the health of all individuals and communities. The AHA leads, represents and serves hospitals, health systems and other related organizations that are accountable to the community and committed to equitable care and health…

—
4
Coalition for Healthcare Communication Inc

The coalition for healthcare communication, inc. ("chc") is an organization that promotes the free exchange of accurate, credible scientific and medical information (see schedule o).

—
5
National Alliance for Care At Home

The association represents and advocates for home health agencies, hospices, and home care providers across the united states. it advances high quality, accessible home based care through federal and regulatory advocacy, professional…

—
6
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
7
National Association for Healthcare Quality

To prepare individuals and organizations to lead, inspire, and advance healthcare quality and safety across the continuum.

Health
8
American College Health Association

The american college health association (acha) serves as the principal leadership organization for advancing the health of college students and campus communities through advocacy, education, and research.

Health
9
Association of Academic Health Centers Inc

The association of academic health centers (aahc) seeks to improve the nation's health care system by mobilizing and enhancing the strengths and resources of the academic health center enterprise in health professions, education, patient…

—
10
National Health Council Inc

To provide a united voice for people with chronic diseases and disabilities.

—
11
National Alliance of Healthcare Purchaser Coalitions Inc

To accelerate the nation's progress towards safe, efficient, high - quality health care and the improved health status of the american population.

—
12
Executives for Health Innovation Ehi

Executives for Health Innovation (EHI) is a catalyst for healthcare transformation, convening diverse leaders from across the industry to unlock opportunities for collaborative innovation. EHI focuses on collaborative learning, shaping…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Medical Fellowships Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mha Health Research and Educational Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
65/69
Grantees still filing
37/69
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE: $11,800,000 · HealthCOALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CAREHealth Research and Educational Trust: $2,160,345 · HealthHealth Research and Educational TrustAONL FOUNDATION FOR NURSING LEADERSHIP RESEARCH AND EDUCATION: $1,200,000 · HealthAONL FOUNDATION FOR NURSING LEADERSHIP RESEARCH AND EDUCATION+20 more: $1,280,375 · Health+20 moreINSTITUTE FOR DIVERSITY AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT INC: $4,342,156 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR DIVERSITY AND HEALTH MA…PARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE FUTURE INC: $1,500,000 · OtherPARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE…MAJORITY FORWARD: $1,000,000 · OtherMAJORITY FORWARDNew Heights for America: $500,000 · OtherNew Heights for America+39 more: $1,973,270 · Other+39 moreONE NATION: $1,000,000 · Public Benefit+2 more: $20,500 · Public BenefitCAMPAIGN FOR SUSTAINABLE RX PRICING: $410,000 · Community ImprovementHOUSE MAJORITY FORWARD: $100,000 · Community Improvement+2 more: $19,500 · Community ImprovementWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $375,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FIRE PROTECTION RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $287,500 · Public Safety & DisasterUkrainian Resistance Foundation: $25,000 · Public Safety & DisasterNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $310,000 · Science & Tech
Health$16,440,720Other$9,315,426Public Benefit$1,020,500Community Improvement$529,500Arts & Culture$375,000Public Safety & Disaster$312,500Science & Tech$310,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE: $11,800,000 over 4y, 69% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR DIVERSITY AND HEALTH MANAGEMENT INC: $4,342,156 over 4y, 83% of budgetHealth Research and Educational Trust: $2,160,345 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE FUTURE INC: $1,500,000 over 3y, 9.4% of budgetAONL FOUNDATION FOR NURSING LEADERSHIP RESEARCH AND EDUCATION: $1,200,000 over 1y, 78% of budgetMAJORITY FORWARD: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetONE NATION: $1,000,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCoalition To Transform Advanced Car: $500,000 over 7y, 4.9% of budgetNew Heights for America: $500,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCAMPAIGN FOR SUSTAINABLE RX PRICING: $410,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC: $375,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $310,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FIRE PROTECTION RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $287,500 over 3y, 7.5% of budgetCommission on Accreditation of Healthcare Management Education: $206,500 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetUNIDOSUS: $187,663 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $150,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetChamber of Commerce of the USA: $139,583 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetB NAI B RITH: $135,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CONGRESSIONAL INSTITUTE INC: $103,125 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFLORIDA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNCHC ACTION FUND: $100,000 over 1y, 50% of budgetHOUSE MAJORITY FORWARD: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAlliance for Health Policy: $90,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetBLUFORD HEALTHCARE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $80,000 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE LEADERSHIP: $76,875 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUST: $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR HEALTH DESIGN INC: $75,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC: $74,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHEALTHCARE WORKFORCE COALITION: $70,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HEALTH SERVICES EXECUTIVES: $60,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROGRAMS IN HEALTH ADMINISTRATION: $60,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetPROJECT PERFECT WORLD FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetTexas Hospital Association: $55,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES: $45,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetIOWA HOSPITAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $35,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetDAVID A WINSTON HEALTH POLICY FELLOWSHIP: $35,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED HOSPITAL FUND OF NEW YORK: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetNATIONAL QUALITY FORUM: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUkrainian Resistance Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetALABAMA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNational Council of Insurance Legislators: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMHA HEALTH RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLOUISIANA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pharmaceutical Resear…Federation of America…Cedars-Sinai Medical …AARPKaiser Foundation Hea…American Property Cas…American Medical Asso…Edison Electric Insti…Biotechnology Innovat…The Commonwealth FundCalifornia Healthcare…American Health Care …
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of AmericaDC21.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Federation of American Hospitals · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · AARP · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc · American Property Casualty Insurance Association · American Medical Association · Edison Electric Institute Inc · Biotechnology Innovation Organization · The Commonwealth Fund · California Healthcare Foundation · American Health Care Association

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization American Hospital Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from American Hospital Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 50%
  • The Fire Protection Research Foundation: 50% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on American Hospital Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home