How much did American Hospital Association grant in FY2024?

Health$16MPublic Benefit$1.0MCommunity Improvement$530kArts & Culture$375kPublic Safety & Disaster$313kScience & Tech$310kEducation$276kHuman Services$165kPhilanthropy$115kOther$8.8M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

technology innovationresearch educationfieldchildrendesign researchhealthcare designbest

2019

receivescientificvanderbiltvumcacademicpersonalizedresearch educational

2020

traffickingsurvivorsnationcoveragecongressionalexpand accessbetter

2021

nationcoveragelegislativecongressionalbetterexpand accesspolicy issues

2022

coverageexpand accesswhat'smedicare medicaidlowersocialbuilding

2023

suppliesukrainestatessciences nasnas dedicateddedicated furtherancefurtherance science

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $5k
$10k–50k14 grants · $276k
$50k–250k3 grants · $170k
$250k+5 grants · $11M

$27,375

Median grant

States reached

$435M

Total assets

Largest grants

COALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE$8,000,000
AONL FOUNDATION FOR NURSING LEADERSHIP RESEARCH AND EDUCATION$1,200,000
MAJORITY FORWARD$1,000,000
NEWHEIGHTS FOR AMERICA$500,000
ONE NATION$500,000
HEALTHCARE WORKFORCE COALITION$70,000
NORTH CAROLINA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$50,000
DEMOCRATIC GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION$50,000
NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCATION$45,000
ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROGRAMS IN HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (AUPHA)$30,000
COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT EDUCATION (CAHME)$27,500
NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE LEADERSHIP$27,375
B'NAI B'RITH$25,000
ALABAMA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION$25,000
BLUFORD HEALTHCARE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$15,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$24M · 40 repeat orgs$3.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

40 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$24M

$922k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%

+22%

Still filing today

88%

77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.9M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthCommunity ImprovementEducationPhilanthropyPublic BenefitPublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CT
COALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE
4× · 2018–2024 · $12M · revenue +503% · 69% of their budget
IF
INSTITUTE FOR DIVERSITY IN HEALTH MANAGEMENT
4× · 2017–2020 · $4.3M · revenue +48% · 83% of their budget
ON
ONE NATION
3× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +117%

Funded once

W
WTTW
one grant, 2023 · $375k · revenue +4%
HM
HOUSE MAJORITY FORWARDgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +1078%
NA
NCHC ACTION FUND
one grant, 2017 · $100k · 50% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

National Coalition On Health Care

The mission of the national coalition on health care (nchc) is to support research and analysis, develop and promote policy solutions, build consensus, and engage the public in order to ensure that america has a high quality health system…

Health

American Hospital Association

To advance the health of all individuals and communities. The AHA leads, represents and serves hospitals, health systems and other related organizations that are accountable to the community and committed to equitable care and health…

—

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic

Advancing health through research, education, clinical practice, and community partnerships; providing each person the best care in the right place, at the right time, every time.

Health

Commission On Accreditation for Health

Cahiim accredits college level programs in health informatics and health information management.

Education

America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit

Health Markets Policy Network

Education and networking organization to promote fellowship and collaboration among health care leaders who studyeffects of health care policy on the health care marketplace. The organization will promote their work and engage media t…

Health

Executives for Health Innovation Ehi

Executives for health innovation (ehi) is a catalyst for healthcare transformation, convening diverse leaders from across the industryto unlock opportunities for collaborative innovation. ehi focuses on education, shaping policy, and…

—

Global Health Council

Global health council is the leading membership organization supporting and connecting advocates, implementers, and stakeholders around global health priorities worldwide. the global health council, inc. (the "council"ghc") was…

International

American Public Health Association

To build public health capacity and promote effective policy and practice.

Health

American Health Care Association

The american health care association is a non-profit federation of affiliate state health organizations, together representing more than 14,000 non-profit and for-profit nursing, assisted living, developmentally - disabled, and sub-acute…

—

Integrated Healthcare Association

To solve industry-wide challenges that stand in the way of high-value care.

—

Institute for Healthcare Improvement

To improve health and health care worldwide.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Healthcare and the most unlike its peers is Unidosus. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/78

the rest of the field

10%

1,356/12,923

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

68 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

65/68

Grantees still filing

48/68

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$16,440,720Other$9,315,426Public Benefit$1,020,500Community Improvement$529,500Arts & Culture$375,000Public Safety & Disaster$312,500Science & Tech$310,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Federation of American HospitalsDC22.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Federation of American Hospitals · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · AARP · American Medical Association · The Commonwealth Fund · Dignity Health · American Property Casualty Insurance Association · Edison Electric Institute Inc · Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc · The California Endowment · Ctia - the Wireless Association

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation American Hospital Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: INSTITUTE FOR DIVERSITY IN HEALTH MANAGEMENT.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 582094118 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on INSTITUTE FOR DIVERSITY IN HEALTH MANAGEMENT, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 83% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to American Hospital Association?

Find your warmest path to American Hospital Association through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

American Hospital Association

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

68 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to American Hospital Association?

More from the funding graph

American Hospital Association

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

68 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to American Hospital Association?

More from the funding graph