Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Third Sector New England Inc

Tsne strengthens organizations working towards a just and equitable society.

$13M
Granted FY2025still arriving
94
Grants FY2025still arriving
25
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$25MHuman Services$9.6MPublic Benefit$7.8MHealth$6.3MCommunity Improvement$3.8MScience & Tech$2.8MCivil Rights$2.7MCrime & Legal$1.9MOther$0
02FY2025 · 94 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k35 grants · $838k
  • $50k–250k49 grants · $6.6M
  • $250k+7 grants · $5.0M
$84,000
Median grant
25
States reached
$116M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER GRANTS & CONTRACTS$1,086,031
POLICY INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN OF LOUISIANA INC$1,043,288
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT DC TREASURY$914,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE$538,107
CHILD CARE ASSOCIATES$531,868
STATE OF COLORADO DEPT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD$493,546
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION$423,361
FAMILY FORWARD OREGON$204,000
9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING WOMEN INC$204,000
ISAIAH$204,000
ALABAMA INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE$204,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS$204,000
THE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO$200,000
SAINT PAUL & MINNESOTA FOUNDATION$200,000
SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$200,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $6.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CALIFORNIA CHILD CARE RESOURCE AND REFERRAL NETWORK: $171k → 10%TRIBAL CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA: $137k → 11%ALLIANCE FOR EARLY SUCCESS: $220k → 5%BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE - MILWAUKEE: $125k → 17%EQUITY BEFORE BIRTH: $125k → 11%MIGRANT EQUITY SOUTHEAST INC: $125k → 16%BLACK CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE - OHIO AFFILIATE: $125k → 17%TACOMA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $110k → 9%SKAGIT VALLEY FAMILY YMCA: $120k → 11%NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $159k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SPOKANE DBA CATHOLIC CHARITIES EASTERN WASHINGTON: $45k → 12%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $154k → 23%PIONEER VALLEY PROJECT: $82k → 17%CALIFORNIA CHILD CARE RESOURCE AND REFERRAL NETWORK: $119k → 10%TRIBAL CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA: $100k → 11%VIBRANT FUTURES: $76k → 11%JANUS YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $60k → 12%TACOMA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $56k → 9%SKAGIT VALLEY FAMILY YMCA: $60k → 11%NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $60k → 12%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $115k → 23%BROCKTON WORKERS ALLIANCE: $52k → 8%PIONEER VALLEY PROJECT: $53k → 17%FIRST UP: $130k → 22%CALIFORNIA CHILD CARE RESOURCE AND REFERRAL NETWORK: $115k → 10%TRIBAL CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA: $100k → 11%THE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $200k → 12%SKAGIT VALLEY FAMILY YMCA: $50k → 11%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $110k → 23%BOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM: $300k → 16%FIRST UP: $129k → 22%PUBLIC ALLIES INC: $119k → 17%FIRST UP: $125k → 22%PUBLIC ALLIES INC: $115k → 17%STATE POWER FUND: $80k → 19%INSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT PRACTICE: $138k → 16%ACEDONE: $104k → 16%ACEDONE: $99k → 16%ACEDONE: $54k → 16%ACEDONE: $49k → 16%TRUE ALLIANCE CENTER INC: $134k → 16%TRUE ALLIANCE CENTER INC: $111k → 16%TRUE ALLIANCE CENTER INC: $59k → 16%NEIGHBORS UNITED FOR A BETTER EAST BOSTON: $85k → 16%RIAN IMMIGRANT CENTER INC: $60k → 16%BRAZILIAN WOMEN'S GROUP: $130k → 16%BRAZILIAN WOMEN'S GROUP: $94k → 16%BRAZILIAN WOMEN'S GROUP: $56k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$55M · 125 repeat orgs$10M to everyone else

125 repeat relationships — 62 still active in FY2025, 63 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

125
221

Total granted

$55M
$7.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+28%

Still filing today

80%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementHealthHousing & ShelterCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UE
    UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $4.5M · revenue +44%
  • ED
    EVERYDAY DEMOCRACY INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $2.5M · revenue +31% · 30% of their budget
  • PI
    POLICY INSTITUTE FOR THE CHILDREN OF LOUISIANA INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $2.0M · revenue +142%

Funded once

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY
    one grant, 2020 · $707k
  • AF
    AGENDA FOR CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $350k · revenue +177%
  • BOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $300k · revenue +88%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
2
CommonHealth Action

CommonHealth ACTION develops people and organizations to produce health through equitable policies, programs, and practices.

Health
3
Massachusetts Council of Human Services Providers Inc

To advance the interests of the human services sector and providers through advocacy, education, and engagement of diverse stakeholders for collective impact.

4
Neighborhealth Corporation

Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…

Health
5
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
6
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
7
Massachusetts Nonprofit Network

The mission of the massachusetts nonprofit network is to unite and strengthen the nonprofit sector in the commonwealth through public policy, public awareness, and capacity building services.

Education
8
Metropolitan Boston Housing Partnership Inc D/B/a Metro Housing Boston

Metro housing boston mobilizes wide-ranging resources to provide innovative and personalized services that lead families and individuals to housing stability, economic security, and an improved quality of life.

Housing & Shelter
9
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

10
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
11
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

12
Massachusetts Housing Investment Corporation

Mhic's mission is to be an innovative private financier of afforable housing and community development throughout new england, providing financing that would not otherwise be available, and extending the impact of that financing to ensure…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Everthrive Illinois and the most unlike its peers is Sowega Rising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Pregnancy Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Youth Development ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Immigrant Worker SupportYmca Youth DevelopmentPolicy Research and AdvocacyElementary Literacy TutoringCommunity FoundationsSenior Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsUnited Way AffiliatesEnvironmental Conservation …Youth Development CentersJewish Community Organizati…Local Food System Organizat…Food Banks and PantriesHealth Access Advocacy and …Independent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%36%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.5%2/380
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,185

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

281 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 281 of the 380 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

13
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
73
Early backer (in before they grew)
274/281
Grantees still filing
185/281
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK — $3,723,279 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARKARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY — $2,946,816 · OtherARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITYEVERYDAY DEMOCRACY INC — $2,476,988 · OtherEVERYDAY DEMOCRACY INCREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $2,351,648 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO — $2,331,164 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADODC PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $2,059,000 · OtherDC PUBLIC SCHOOLSUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $1,903,852 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILLCOLORADO ENERGY OFFICE — $1,701,432 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII SYSTEM — $1,306,279 · Other+82 more — $14,479,686 · Other+82 moreUNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES INC — $4,476,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY ENTE…SALISH KOOTENAI COLLEGE INC — $866,000 · EducationSALISH KOOTENAI…GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $846,728 · EducationGEORGIA STATE U…For Providers by Providers Louisiana — $366,558 · Education+22 more — $2,457,997 · Education+22 morePOLICY INSTITUTE FOR THE CHILDREN OF LOUISIANA INC — $1,998,805 · Human ServicesPOLICY INSTITUT…FAMILY FORWARD OREGON — $967,285 · Human ServicesFAMILY FORWARD …California Child Care Resource and Referral Network — $404,800 · Human ServicesFIRST UP — $384,000 · Human ServicesSPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES — $379,000 · Human ServicesBRAZILIAN WOMEN'S GROUP INC — $348,547 · Human ServicesTHE TRIBAL CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA — $337,002 · Human ServicesAFRICAN COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF NEW ENGLAND — $323,622 · Human ServicesTRUE ALLIANCE CENTER INC — $304,175 · Human ServicesBOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM INC — $300,000 · Human Services+33 more — $3,251,236 · Human Services+33 moreTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $1,728,042 · Community ImprovementFUSION PARTNERSHIP INC — $619,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $579,000 · Community ImprovementWEPOWER — $563,285 · Community ImprovementBeloved Community Inc — $275,000 · Community ImprovementCRAFT3 — $237,731 · Community ImprovementURBAN GUILD INC — $175,000 · Community Improvement+10 more — $830,500 · Community ImprovementPUBLIC POLICY AND EDUCATION FUND OF NEW YORK INC — $897,570 · Public BenefitCOALITION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE EDUCATION FUND INC — $867,800 · Public BenefitTHE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE — $779,000 · Public BenefitChangeLab Solutions — $155,200 · Public Benefit+2 more — $110,352 · Public BenefitTHE OLE EDUCATION FUND — $1,019,800 · Civil RightsMOTHERING JUSTICE — $584,800 · Civil RightsPOWER COALITION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE — $329,000 · Civil Rights+4 more — $126,000 · Civil RightsMOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND — $480,285 · PhilanthropyThe Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc — $200,000 · PhilanthropySAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $200,000 · PhilanthropySAINT PAUL & MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $200,000 · PhilanthropyBLUE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $113,945 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER NEW HAVEN — $100,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Spokane County — $58,395 · Philanthropy+2 more — $63,426 · Philanthropy
Other$35,280,144Education$9,013,283Human Services$8,998,472Community Improvement$5,007,558Public Benefit$2,809,922Civil Rights$2,059,600Philanthropy$1,616,051

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES INC — $4,476,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetEVERYDAY DEMOCRACY INC — $2,476,988 over 5y, 30% of budgetPOLICY INSTITUTE FOR THE CHILDREN OF LOUISIANA INC — $1,998,805 over 3y, 22% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $1,728,042 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTHE OLE EDUCATION FUND — $1,019,800 over 6y, 7.5% of budgetISAIAH — $983,800 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetFAMILY FORWARD OREGON — $967,285 over 6y, 13% of budgetPUBLIC POLICY AND EDUCATION FUND OF NEW YORK INC — $897,570 over 6y, 4.0% of budget9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING WOMEN INC — $873,800 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetCOALITION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE EDUCATION FUND INC — $867,800 over 6y, 22% of budgetSALISH KOOTENAI COLLEGE INC — $866,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $846,728 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE — $779,000 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetAlabama Institute for Social Justice — $759,000 over 5y, 55% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE MENOMINEE NATION — $674,213 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetFUSION PARTNERSHIP INC — $619,000 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetMOTHERING JUSTICE — $584,800 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $579,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWEPOWER — $563,285 over 4y, 5.6% of budgetCOLORADO STATEWIDE PARENT COALITION — $486,285 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetMOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND — $480,285 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCalifornia Child Care Resource and Referral Network — $404,800 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetFIRST UP — $384,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetSPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES — $379,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetGlobal Financial Integrity — $366,780 over 7y, 8.2% of budgetFor Providers by Providers Louisiana — $366,558 over 4y, 13% of budgetAGENDA FOR CHILDREN — $350,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBRAZILIAN WOMEN'S GROUP INC — $348,547 over 7y, 29% of budgetTHE TRIBAL CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA — $337,002 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetPOWER COALITION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE — $329,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetAFRICAN COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF NEW ENGLAND — $323,622 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetTRUE ALLIANCE CENTER INC — $304,175 over 3y, 25% of budgetBOSTON HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS PROGRAM INC — $300,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLYNN COMMUNITY HEALTH INC — $300,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBeloved Community Inc — $275,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetNORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES — $260,101 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetBROCKTON NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC — $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR EARLY SUCCESS FKA BIRTH TO FIVE POLICY ALLIANCE — $239,810 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCRAFT3 — $237,731 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPUBLIC ALLIES INC — $234,285 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC — $234,270 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Skagit Valley Family YMCA — $229,747 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $221,557 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY POLICY CENTER — $200,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC — $200,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetALABAMA PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN — $200,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetSTART EARLY — $200,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES INC
  • Who funds EVERYDAY DEMOCRACY INC
  • Who funds POLICY INSTITUTE FOR THE CHILDREN OF LOUISIANA INC
  • Who funds THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC
  • Who funds THE OLE EDUCATION FUND
  • Who funds ISAIAH
  • Who funds FAMILY FORWARD OREGON
  • Who funds PUBLIC POLICY AND EDUCATION FUND OF NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds 9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING WOMEN INC
  • Who funds COALITION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE EDUCATION FUND INC
  • Who funds SALISH KOOTENAI COLLEGE INC
  • Who funds GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE
  • Who funds Alabama Institute for Social Justice
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF THE MENOMINEE NATION
  • Who funds FUSION PARTNERSHIP INC
  • Who funds MOTHERING JUSTICE
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS
  • Who funds WEPOWER
  • Who funds CHILD CARE ASSOCIATES
  • Who funds COLORADO STATEWIDE PARENT COALITION
  • Who funds MOMSRISING EDUCATION FUND
  • Who funds California Child Care Resource and Referral Network
  • Who funds FIRST UP
  • Who funds SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES
  • Who funds Global Financial Integrity
  • Who funds For Providers by Providers Louisiana
  • Who funds AGENDA FOR CHILDREN

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hyams Foundation IncMA52.9× affinity25 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hyams Foundation Inc · Health Resources in Action Inc · Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center Inc · Barr Foundation · Pritzker Family Foundation · Alliance for Early Success Fka Birth to Five Policy Alliance · Haymarket People's Fund Inc · Philanthropy Massachusetts Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · The Lenny Zakim Fund · Herman and Frieda L Miller Foundation · Children's Hospital Corporation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Third Sector New England Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 210%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Orleans County Child Advocacy Center Inc97% of income from government
  • Young Women's Christian Association of L53% of income from government
  • O League49% of income from government
  • Janus Youth Programs Inc46% of income from government
  • Quincy Asian Resources Inc43% of income from government
  • Greater Lawrence Family Health Center Inc40% of income from government
  • La Colaborativa Inc34% of income from government
  • Aids Support Group of Cape Cod Inc33% of income from government
  • Lynn Community Health Inc31% of income from government
  • Fenway Community Health Center Inc27% of income from government
  • Center for Human Development Inc26% of income from government
  • Cumacecho Inc25% of income from government
  • Institute for Community Health Inc13% of income from government
  • Yale University12% of income from government
  • Brockton Neighborhood Health Center Inc9% of income from government
  • Brandeis University9% of income from government
  • Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc8% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
  • Steps to Success Inc5% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc3% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc3% of income from government
  • Fusion Partnership Inc3% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Legal Services Inc3% of income from government
  • Asian Community Development Corporation2% of income from government
  • Urban Guild Inc2% of income from government
  • The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven2% of income from government
  • Chinese Culture Connection Inc2% of income from government
  • Resist Inc2% of income from government
  • Madison Park Development Corporation1% of income from government
  • CRAFT31% of income from government
  • Brazilian Women's Group Inc0% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce0% of income from government
  • Asian American Resource Workshop Inc0% of income from government
  • North Shore Community Development Coalit0% of income from government
  • Community Labor United Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
21get no government money at all
48report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 380 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph