· Private foundation
Alaska Airlines Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k41 grants · $216k
- $10k–50k24 grants · $307k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Alaska Development Corporation | $50,000 |
| Angel City Aerospace Foundation | $30,000 |
| Fly Compton Aeronautical Education Foundation | $20,000 |
| YMCA of Greater Seattle | $20,000 |
| United Way of King County | $20,000 |
| Hawaii First Robotics | $15,000 |
| Silicon Valley Education Foundation | $15,000 |
| Adult Friends for Youth | $15,000 |
| Alliance for Education | $12,000 |
| Covenant House Alaska | $10,000 |
| Yuut Elitnaurviat Inc | $10,000 |
| Hera School | $10,000 |
| EXCEL Alaska Inc | $10,000 |
| Oregon Museum of Science and Industry | $10,000 |
| New Avenues for Youth | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $463k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 48% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 14% of Alaska Airlines Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 20% of the giving stays in AK; read by stated purpose it is 40% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
68 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $210k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ADAlaska Development Corporation3× · 2022–2024 · $150k · revenue +102% · 43% of their budget
- TYTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871)5× · 2020–2024 · $100k · revenue +43%
- CHCOVENANT HOUSE ALASKA5× · 2020–2024 · $80k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- HSHIGHLINE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCEgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +163%
UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INCone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -29%
COUNCIL FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN ADVANCEMENTgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +64%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.
Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…
Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
School's out washington (sowa) drives positive systemic change so that all washington's children and youth, particularly those furthest from justice, have access to a robust ecosystem of high-quality expanded learning programs.
The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…
To support equitable access to economic opportunities for immigrants, refugees, low-income, marginalized, and underserved communities in king county and the united states.
The mission of Impact Public Schools is to prepare a diverse student population to succeed in college and impact communities as the next generation of equity-driven, innovative leaders. (Continued on Schedule O)Impact Public Schools makes…
Washington Ethnic Studies Now WAESN is a multigenerational majority POC-led nonprofit advancing Ethnic Studies and racial justice in Washington. We center people of color build youth-centered leadership and learning and organize…
Equal opportunity schools' mission is to strengthen educator and system leader capacity to break down barriers to increase access, belonging, and success in rigorous college and career-prep secondary school courses for students of color…
With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…
Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Washington Stem Center and the most unlike its peers is Kapena School of Music. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
174 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 174 of the 187 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Alaska Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds HIGHLINE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) ↗
- Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF KING COUNTY ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ALASKA ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON FIRST ROBOTICS ↗
- Who funds Junior Achievement of Alaska Inc ↗
- Who funds CLIMBHI ↗
- Who funds EXCEL ALASKA INC ↗
- Who funds Girls Inc of the Pacific Northwest ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds RAINIER SCHOLARS ↗
- Who funds Alliance for Education ↗
- Who funds Ilisagvik College ↗
- Who funds The Alaska Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds Fly Compton Aeronautical Education Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE WASHINGTON STEM CENTER ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE POSSIBLE INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds Techbridge Girls ↗
- Who funds ADELANTE MUJERES ↗
- Who funds JUMA VENTURES INC ↗
- Who funds AFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN ADVANCEMENT ↗
- Who funds TECHNOLOGY ACCESS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DEV MISSION ↗
- Who funds NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC FOUNDATION OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds SILICON VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PHILANTHROPY NORTHWEST ↗
- Who funds ADULT FRIENDS FOR YOUTH ↗
- Who funds Southwest Youth And Family Services ↗
- Who funds CHOICES EDUCATION GROUP ↗
- Who funds Sharefest Community Development Inc ↗
- Who funds Larkin Street Youth Services ↗
- Who funds OREGON MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Norcliffe Foundation · School's Out Washington · Seattle Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · United Way of King County · Medina Foundation · Harvest Foundation · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Alaska Airlines Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Reap Inc — 46% of income from government
- Adelante Mujeres — 31% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
- New Avenues for Youth Inc — 20% of income from government
- Latino Network — 15% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Portland Workforce Alliance — 8% of income from government
- Impact Nw — 8% of income from government
- Oregon Museum of Science and Industry — 4% of income from government
- Girls Inc of the Pacific Northwest — 4% of income from government
- Portland Community Media — 1% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
- Oregon Business Academy — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Alaska Airlines Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Alaska Airlines Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.