Skip to content

Colorado · Private foundation

Maki Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$237k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
51
Grants FY2025
51
Organizations funded FY2024
14%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$7,000
Organizations funded a year
51 to 64
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
10
Total assets, FY2025
$5.0M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 14% of the organizations Maki Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 12% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentAnimalsEducationArts & CultureSocial ScienceHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving51$237k18%
FY202451$229k14%
FY202351$204k10%
FY202255$231k20%
FY202154$229k7%
FY202064$233k20%
FY201955$205k25%
FY201851$196k24%
98% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$1.6MAnimals$151kCommunity Improvement$63kArts & Culture$47kPublic Benefit$28kRecreation & Sports$21kCivil Rights$10kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MT
OR
NV
WY
CA
UT
CO
AZ
NM
DC

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 90 grantees
All grantees of Maki Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Energy & Conservation Law$50,00098%
High Country Conservation Advocates$48,00092%
Aspen Journalism$47,00073%
Western Mining Action Project Inc$45,00092%
New Mexico Environmental Law Center$42,00091%
Western Environmental Law Center$40,00090%
Wilderness Workshop$39,00081%
Wild Connections Inc$38,00096%
Western Colorado Alliance$38,00081%
Montana Environmental Information Center$38,00091%
Friends of the Clearwater Inc$38,00083%
Snake River Waterkeeper Inc$38,00094%
San Luis Valley Ecosystem Council Inc$37,00095%
Yaak Valley Forest Council$37,00091%
San Juan Citizens Alliance$37,00091%
Craighead Institute$37,000810%
Great Old Broads for Wilderness$37,00081%
Powder River Basin Resource Council$36,00062%
Advocates for the West Inc$36,00080%
Yellowstone to Uintas Connection$35,00088%
Rocky Mountain Wild$31,50072%
Utah Rivers Council Inc$31,00062%
Information Network for Responsible Mining Inc$30,0006n/a
Wilderness Watch Inc$30,00061%
Canyonlands Field Institute Inc$29,50091%
Citizens for a Healthy Community$29,00066%
Sheep Mountain Alliance$29,00078%
Sageland Collaborative$29,00091%
Western Leaders Network$28,00072%
Friends of the Wild Swan$27,000619%
Park County Environmental Council$25,00070%
Wyoming Wilderness Association$24,50061%
Backcountry Hunters & Anglers$24,00060%
350 Colorado$23,00061%
Quiet Use Coalition Inc$22,0008n/a
People and Carnivores Inc$21,00071%
Winter Wildlands Alliance Inc$21,00061%
Western Watersheds Projects Inc$21,00050%
Great Basin Resource Watch$20,00049%
Grand Staircase - Escalante Partners Inc$19,00051%
Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah$18,00041%
Nfria-Wserc Conservation Center Inc$18,00041%
Friends of Scotchman Peaks Wilderness Inc$16,00062%
The Glacier-Two Medicine Alliance$16,00042%
Earth Law Center$14,50040%
Save the Poudre Poudre Waterkeeper$13,00046%
Footloose Montana$13,00043%
Western Wildlife Conservancy$13,0006n/a
Colorado Wild Public Lands Inc$12,20037%
Northern Rockies Research & Educational Services Inc$12,00043%
Climate Conservation Dba Center for Large Landscape Conservation$11,00030%
Citizens Committee to Save Our$11,00041%
Roaring Fork Safe Passages$10,00024%
Idaho Wildlife Federation$9,00021%
Upper Gila Watershed Alliance$9,00023%
Rocky Mountain Raptor Program$9,00030%
Amigos Bravos Inc$9,00030%
Dolores River Boating Advocates$9,00022%
Northern Plains Resource Council$8,0002n/a
New Mexico Wilderness Alliance$8,00020%
Gateway Conservation Alliance$8,000216%
Buffalo Field Campaign Inc$7,00021%
Southwest Environmental Center$7,00022%
Idaho Rivers United$6,50021%
Wildwest Institute$6,0002n/a
Big Hole River Foundation Inc$6,00022%
Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc$6,00020%
Montana Wildlife Federation$5,00020%
Utah Wildlife Federation$5,0001n/a
The Salmonfly Project$5,00011%
Alliance for the Wild Rockies Inc$5,00011%
Stewardship Utah Foundation$4,00010%
Teton Raptor Center$4,00020%
Flathead-Lolo-Bitterroot Citizen Task Force$4,0001n/a
National Wildlife Refuge Association$3,00010%
North American Wilderness Recovery$3,0001n/a
Boulder Climbing Community$3,0001n/a
Save America's Forests Fund Inc$3,00014%
Middle Colorado Watershed Council$3,00011%
Durango Nature Studies$3,00011%
Rock Creek Alliance Inc$3,00015%
Idaho Trails Association$3,00012%
Conservation Voters New Mexico Education Fund$3,0001n/a
Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance$3,00020%
Cabinet Resource Group$2,0001n/a
Upper Colorado River Watershed Group dba Upper Colorado Watershed Environme$2,0001n/a
Ocean First Institute$2,00011%
Wyoming Wildlife Federation$2,00010%
Southern Plains Land Trust Inc$2,00010%
Mosquito Range Heritage Initiative$1,00011%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 32 recipients with no EIN on record ($274k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Maki Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEnergy & Conservation Law: $50,000 over 9y, 8.3% of budgetHigh Country Conservation Advocates: $48,000 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetAspen Journalism: $47,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetWestern Mining Action Project Inc: $45,000 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetNew Mexico Environmental Law Center: $42,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetWestern Environmental Law Center: $40,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetWilderness Workshop: $39,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetWild Connections Inc: $38,000 over 9y, 5.6% of budgetWestern Colorado Alliance: $38,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetMontana Environmental Information Center: $38,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetFriends of the Clearwater Inc: $38,000 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetSnake River Waterkeeper Inc: $38,000 over 9y, 3.6% of budgetSan Luis Valley Ecosystem Council Inc: $37,000 over 9y, 5.2% of budgetYaak Valley Forest Council: $37,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetSan Juan Citizens Alliance: $37,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetCraighead Institute: $37,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetGreat Old Broads for Wilderness: $37,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetPowder River Basin Resource Council: $36,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetAdvocates for the West Inc: $36,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetYellowstone to Uintas Connection: $35,000 over 8y, 7.9% of budgetRocky Mountain Wild: $31,500 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetUtah Rivers Council Inc: $31,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetWilderness Watch Inc: $30,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetCanyonlands Field Institute Inc: $29,500 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetCitizens for a Healthy Community: $29,000 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetSheep Mountain Alliance: $29,000 over 7y, 8.1% of budgetSageland Collaborative: $29,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetWestern Leaders Network: $28,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetFriends of the Wild Swan: $27,000 over 6y, 19% of budgetPark County Environmental Council: $25,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetWyoming Wilderness Association: $24,500 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetBackcountry Hunters & Anglers: $24,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budget350 Colorado: $23,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetPeople and Carnivores Inc: $21,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetWinter Wildlands Alliance Inc: $21,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetWestern Watersheds Projects Inc: $21,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetGreat Basin Resource Watch: $20,000 over 4y, 8.6% of budgetGrand Staircase - Escalante Partners Inc: $19,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetHealthy Environment Alliance of Utah: $18,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetNfria-Wserc Conservation Center Inc: $18,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetFriends of Scotchman Peaks Wilderness Inc: $16,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetThe Glacier-Two Medicine Alliance: $16,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetEarth Law Center: $14,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetSave the Poudre Poudre Waterkeeper: $13,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetFootloose Montana: $13,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetColorado Wild Public Lands Inc: $12,200 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetNorthern Rockies Research & Educational Services Inc: $12,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetClimate Conservation Dba Center for Large Landscape Conservation: $11,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 78.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PatagoniaorgCA108.5× affinity64 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Patagoniaorg · The New-Land Foundation Inc · Resources Legacy Fund · The Wilderness Society · Western Conservation Foundation · Wilburforce Foundation · The Pew Charitable Trusts · Colorado Gives Foundation · National Forest Foundation · The Wolcott Family Foundation · Clif Family Foundation · Conservation Lands Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Maki Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Maki Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Maki Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Maki Foundation

How much does Maki Foundation give?
Maki Foundation reported 51 grants totaling $236,900 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 51 and 64 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Maki Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Environment (80%), Animals (8%), Community Improvement (3%).
Who are Maki Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Energy & Conservation Law ($50k), High Country Conservation Advocates ($48k), Aspen Journalism ($47k).
Does Maki Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 14% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Maki Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Maki Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Patagoniaorg, The New-Land Foundation Inc, Resources Legacy Fund.
Where is Maki Foundation based?
Maki Foundation is based in CO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 122 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Maki’s filings →

More from the funding graph