Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The New-Land Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
92
Grants FY2024still arriving
19
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Environment$6.5MInternational$1.7MCivil Rights$495kScience & Tech$355kPublic Benefit$345kArts & Culture$285kAnimals$235kEducation$210kOther$0
02FY2024 · 92 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k87 grants · $1.7M
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $270k
$20,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$100,000
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS$70,000
NUCLEAR INFORMATION AND RESOURCE SERVICE$50,000
CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE$50,000
ARMS CONTROL ASSOCIATION$45,000
EARTHJUSTICE$40,000
NAUTILUS INSTITUTE$40,000
ASPEN JOURNALISM$35,000
PLOUGHSHARES FUND$35,000
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY$35,000
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY$30,000
SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION$30,000
ECOFLIGHT$30,000
WESTERN MINING ACTION PROJECT$30,000
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TIDES CENTER: $15k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $15k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $15k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $15k → 10%RURAL UTAH PROJECT EDUCATION FUND: $15k → 8%Jewish Community Center in Manhattan: $25k → 17%STEWARDSHIP UTAH FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MD
AZ
NM
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.9M · 104 repeat orgs$616k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.

104 repeat relationships — 77 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

104
18

Total granted

$9.9M
$391k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+46%

Still filing today

89%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $225k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentInternationalAnimalsPublic BenefitCivil RightsCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CE
    CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $300k · revenue +12%
  • EARTHJUSTICE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $240k · revenue +66%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $225k · revenue +103%

Funded once

  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • FF
    FOCUS FOR DEMOCRACY
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • NEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -93%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
CalWild

The California Wilderness Coalition protects the natural landscapes that make California unique, providing clean air and water, a home to wildlife, and a place for recreation and spiritual renewal.

—
2
Cascadia Wildlands

Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…

Environment
3
Greater Yellowstone Coalition

Greater yellowstone coalition works with all people to protect the lands, waters, and wildlife of the greater yellowstone ecosystem, now and for future generations.

Environment
4
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
5
Washington Forest Law Center

Dedicated to protecting the world's natural environment on behalf of the public by serving as a public interest law firm. refer to schedule o, part iii, line 4a, for list of litigated cases or advocacy work.

—
6
Defenders of Wildlife

Defenders of Wildlife is a national, nonprofit membership organization dedicated to the protection of all native animals and plants in their natural communities.

Animals
7
Living Rivers

Living rivers promotes river restoration through mobilization by articulating conservation and alternative management strategies to the public. seeking to revive the natural habitat and spirit of rivers by undoing the extensive damage done…

Environment
8
Southwest Environmental Center

To promote and protect Wildlife

—
9
Wyoming Wildlife Advocates

To promote science-based wildlife management that fosters ecosystem health and dynamic equilibrium between species throughout the state of wyoming.

Animals
10
Gallatin Wildlife Association

Promote research and actions to save wildlife.

Animals
11
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
12
Crag Law Center

Providing legal aid to the environment by providing legal services to conservation organizations, community groups, native american tribes, and individuals working to protect and sustain the pacific northwest's natural legacy.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Conservation Colorado Education Fund and the most unlike its peers is Guttmacher Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%35%20–35yr13%41%35–55yr16%6%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%35%20–35yr13%41%35–55yr16%11%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%1/117
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,448

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

116 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 116 of the 137 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
41
Early backer (in before they grew)
114/116
Grantees still filing
79/116
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EARTHJUSTICE — $240,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $190,000 · EnvironmentPUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY INC — $180,000 · EnvironmentWESTERN MINING ACTION PROJECT INC — $170,000 · EnvironmentENERGY & CONSERVATION LAW — $160,000 · Environment+53 more — $3,655,000 · Environment+53 moreWILDEARTH GUARDIANS — $210,000 · OtherWILDEARTH GUARDIANSNAUTILUS INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC — $200,000 · OtherNAUTILUS INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INCBulletin of the Atomic Scientists — $120,000 · OtherEARTHWORKS' OIL & GAS ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT — $120,000 · OtherWILDERNESS WORKSHOP — $120,000 · OtherREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION — $110,000 · OtherHIGH COUNTRY CONSERVATION ADVOCATES — $105,000 · OtherWESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $105,000 · OtherWESTERN COLORADO ALLIANCE — $120,000 · OtherWestern Resource Advocates — $150,000 · OtherThe Trustees of Princeton University — $150,000 · Other+42 more — $1,590,365 · Other+42 moreCARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE — $300,000 · InternationalCARNEGIE ENDOW…The Arms Control Associations — $230,000 · InternationalThe Arms Contr…PLOUGHSHARES FUND INC — $175,000 · InternationalPLOUGHSHARES F…LOS ALAMOS STUDY GROUP — $150,000 · InternationalLOS ALAMOS STU…FEDERATION OF AMERICAN SCIENTISTS — $135,000 · InternationalFEDERATION OF …NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE FUND INC — $100,000 · InternationalNATIONAL SECUR…THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $100,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF C…HERBERT SCOVILLE JR PEACE — $65,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP — $50,000 · International+2 more — $40,000 · InternationalCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $225,000 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ASSOCIATION — $150,000 · AnimalsWYOMING WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION — $110,000 · AnimalsXERCES SOCIETY INC — $90,000 · AnimalsWILD SALMON CENTER — $40,000 · Animals+1 more — $20,000 · AnimalsALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE — $150,000 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $140,000 · Civil RightsNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC — $50,000 · Civil RightsPROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT INC — $95,000 · Public BenefitCITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON INC — $95,000 · Public BenefitTAXPAYERS FOR COMMON SENSE — $90,000 · Public BenefitCoalition to Protect Americas National — $10,000 · Public BenefitAspen Journalism — $180,000 · Arts & CultureWild Earth Society Incorporated — $85,000 · Arts & Culture
Environment$4,595,000Other$3,100,365International$1,345,000Animals$635,000Civil Rights$340,000Public Benefit$290,000Arts & Culture$265,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE — $300,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE — $240,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Arms Control Associations — $230,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC — $225,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWILDEARTH GUARDIANS — $210,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $190,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAspen Journalism — $180,000 over 6y, 8.9% of budgetPUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY INC — $180,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetPLOUGHSHARES FUND INC — $175,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetWESTERN MINING ACTION PROJECT INC — $170,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetENERGY & CONSERVATION LAW — $160,000 over 6y, 42% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University — $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ALAMOS STUDY GROUP — $150,000 over 3y, 51% of budgetALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE — $150,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetSouthern Utah Wilderness Alliance — $150,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetWestern Resource Advocates — $150,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ASSOCIATION — $150,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetECOFLIGHT — $145,000 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $140,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFEDERATION OF AMERICAN SCIENTISTS — $135,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetWILDERNESS WATCH INC — $125,000 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetNuclear Information and Resource Service — $125,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetBulletin of the Atomic Scientists — $120,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CLEARWATER INC — $120,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC — $120,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWILDERNESS WORKSHOP — $120,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetPOWDER RIVER BASIN RESOURCE COUNCIL — $120,000 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetWESTERN COLORADO ALLIANCE — $120,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetWYOMING WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION — $110,000 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetWESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECTS INC — $110,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION — $110,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHIGH COUNTRY CONSERVATION ADVOCATES — $105,000 over 6y, 7.2% of budgetWESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $105,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE FUND INC — $100,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetRESOURCE CENTRAL — $100,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC — $100,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT INC — $95,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetWILD CONNECTIONS INC — $95,000 over 6y, 22% of budgetCITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON INC — $95,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCITIZENS FOR A HEALTHY COMMUNITY — $95,000 over 5y, 25% of budgetUTAH RIVERS COUNCIL INC — $95,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetNORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL — $90,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetADVOCATES FOR THE WEST INC — $90,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTRUSTEES FOR ALASKA — $90,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetXERCES SOCIETY INC — $90,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetGREEN CORPS INC — $90,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetSnake River Waterkeeper Inc — $90,000 over 6y, 12% of budgetWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE — $90,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CARNEGIE ENDOWMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL PEACE ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds The Arms Control Associations ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDEARTH GUARDIANS ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Aspen Journalism ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY INC ↗
  • Who funds PLOUGHSHARES FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN MINING ACTION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ENERGY & CONSERVATION LAW ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds LOS ALAMOS STUDY GROUP ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance ↗
  • Who funds Western Resource Advocates ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ECOFLIGHT ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds FEDERATION OF AMERICAN SCIENTISTS ↗
  • Who funds WILDERNESS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Nuclear Information and Resource Service ↗
  • Who funds Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CLEARWATER INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN RIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDERNESS WORKSHOP ↗
  • Who funds POWDER RIVER BASIN RESOURCE COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN COLORADO ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds WYOMING WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HIGH COUNTRY CONSERVATION ADVOCATES ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds RESOURCE CENTRAL ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PatagoniaorgMaki FoundationResources Legacy FundThe Wilderness SocietyWestern Conservation …The Pew Charitable Tr…Wilburforce FoundationTortuga Charitable Fo…Conservation Lands Fo…Colorado Gives Founda…National Forest Found…The Wolcott Family Fo…
PatagoniaorgCA99× affinity58 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Patagoniaorg · Maki Foundation · Resources Legacy Fund · The Wilderness Society · Western Conservation Foundation · The Pew Charitable Trusts · Wilburforce Foundation · Tortuga Charitable Foundation · Conservation Lands Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · National Forest Foundation · The Wolcott Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The New-Land Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Wild Salmon Center — 49% of income from government
  • Xerces Society Inc — 22% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
  • Upstream Usa Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Western Rivers Conservancy — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The New-Land Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The New-Land Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 137 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines