Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Campion Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
40
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$225k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Environment$12MHousing & Shelter$6.3MPhilanthropy$4.2MCommunity Improvement$3.0MCivil Rights$1.7MAnimals$1.2MHuman Services$812kPublic Benefit$679kOther$0
02FY2024 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k31 grants · $529k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.0M
$15,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SEATTLE FOUNDATION$225,000
CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS$150,000
COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL INC$112,000
ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE$100,000
NEW VENTURE FUND$100,000
AUDUBON ALASKA$100,000
NATIVE MOVEMENT$85,000
THE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY$80,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
CONSERVATION LANDS FOUNDATION$40,000
POINT SOURCE YOUTH$35,000
WASHINGTON LOW INCOME HOUSING ALLIANCE$35,000
WILDERNESS SOCIETY$32,000
BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS & ANGLERS$25,000
NATIONAL HOMELESSNESS LAW CENTER$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YOUTH COLLABORATORY INC: $20k → 11%JANUS YOUTH PROGRAMS: $11k → 12%TACOMA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $11k → 9%OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS: $11k → 11%SKAGIT VALLEY YMCA: $11k → 11%NORTHWEST YOUTH SERVICES: $11k → 12%SPECTRUM CENTER: $11k → 12%CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $70k → 14%YOUTH COLLABORATORY INC: $20k → 11%PARTNERS IN PREVENTION EDUCATION: $17k → 9%CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 14%YOUTH COLLABORATORY INC: $15k → 11%CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 14%YOUTH COLLABORATORY INC: $15k → 11%YOUTH COLLABORATORY INC: $20k → 11%YOUTH COLLABORATORY INC: $20k → 11%FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNESS: $25k → 16%FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNESS: $25k → 16%FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNESS: $25k → 16%FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNESS: $25k → 16%FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNESS: $25k → 16%FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNESS: $25k → 16%FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNESS: $25k → 16%FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNESS: $10k → 16%THE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $80k → 9%THE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $69k → 9%THE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $65k → 9%THE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $65k → 9%THE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $65k → 9%THE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $64k → 9%THE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $60k → 9%THE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY: $50k → 9%SEATTLE KING COUNTY COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS: $35k → 9%SEATTLE KING COUNTY COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS: $25k → 9%SEATTLE KING COUNTY COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS: $25k → 9%SEATTLE KING COUNTY COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS: $25k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $20k → 9%SEATTLE KING COUNTY COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS: $20k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $20k → 9%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $15k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $20k → 9%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $15k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $20k → 9%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $15k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $17k → 9%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $15k → 9%YOUTHCARE: $15k → 9%CHIEF SEATTLE CLUB: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
WA
ID
MT
IL
NY
MA
OR
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of Campion Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Campion Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$25M · 57 repeat orgs$922k to everyone else

57 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 33 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
23

Total granted

$25M
$628k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+67%

Still filing today

84%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $294k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AW
    ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $4.9M · revenue +131% · 58% of their budget
  • THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +44%
  • BC
    BUILDING CHANGES
    7× · 2017–2023 · $2.2M · revenue +531%

Funded once

  • HC
    HIGH COUNTRY NEWS
    one grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue -13%
  • AL
    AMERICAN LANDS PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $140k · revenue +170% · 74% of their budget
  • TU
    TROUT UNLIMITED INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +75%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nw Energy Coalition

The NW Energy Coalition is an alliance of over 100 environmental, civic, and human service organizations, utilities, and businesses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, plus many individual members. The NW Energy…

—
2
Fsc I&P

Fsc i&p promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world's forests. this mission aligns with the forest stewardship council (fsc), its network of offices, and other organizations.…

Philanthropy
3
Cowiche Canyon Conservancy

Protecting our shrub-steppe and connecting people to this vanishing landscape.

—
4
Center for Environmental Law & Policy

The Center for Environmental Law & Policy is a statewide organization whose mission is to protect, preserve and restore Washington's waters through education, advocacy, policy reform, and public interest litigation.

Environment
5
Discover Your Northwest

Discover Your Northwest promotes the discovery of northwest public lands, enriches the experience of visitors and builds community stewardship of these special places today and for generations to come.

Recreation & Sports
6
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
7
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
8
Re Sources

RE Sources mobilizes people of Northwest Washington to build just and thriving communities and to protect the land, water, and climate on which we all depend.

Environment
9
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
10
Great Peninsula Conservancy

Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.

Environment
11
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
12
Greater Yellowstone Coalition

Greater yellowstone coalition works with all people to protect the lands, waters, and wildlife of the greater yellowstone ecosystem, now and for future generations.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philanthropy Northwest and the most unlike its peers is Spectrum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Environmental Conservation …Youth Development ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%44%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%22%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/81
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,484

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
27
Early backer (in before they grew)
80/81
Grantees still filing
60/81
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE — $4,926,191 · EnvironmentALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUENEW VENTURE FUND — $2,100,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUNDLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND — $1,050,000 · EnvironmentLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FU…Conservation Lands Foundation — $695,000 · EnvironmentConservation Lands FoundationTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY — $532,000 · EnvironmentTRUSTEES FOR ALASKA — $472,000 · Environment+14 more — $1,513,500 · Environment+14 moreAUDUBON ALASKA — $1,100,000 · OtherAUDUBON ALASKANATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY — $1,055,000 · OtherNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIET…TROUT UNLIMITED ALASKA — $750,000 · OtherTROUT UNLIMITED ALASKAIDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC — $340,000 · OtherIDAHO CONSERVATION LEAG…THE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY — $517,449 · OtherTHE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETYBOARDSOURCE — $226,850 · Other+44 more — $2,322,278 · Other+44 moreWashington Low Income Housing Alliance — $2,133,575 · Housing & ShelterWashington …NATIONAL LOW INCOME HOUSING COALITION — $555,000 · Housing & ShelterNATIONAL LO…NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS — $135,000 · Housing & ShelterSolid Ground Washington — $120,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL INC — $112,000 · Housing & Shelter+5 more — $100,000 · Housing & ShelterTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $2,315,500 · Community ImprovementTHIRD SECT…NATIVE MOVEMENT — $280,000 · Community ImprovementNATIVE MOV…NONPROFIT ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON — $130,000 · Community Improvement501 Commons — $110,000 · Community Improvement+4 more — $28,600 · Community ImprovementSEATTLE FOUNDATION — $1,906,500 · PhilanthropySEATTLE F…The Pew Charitable Trusts — $350,000 · PhilanthropyThe Pew C…INDEPENDENT SECTOR — $200,000 · PhilanthropyINDEPENDE…SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS — $90,000 · Philanthropy+2 more — $40,000 · PhilanthropyBUILDING CHANGES — $2,210,000 · HealthCENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS — $1,397,500 · Civil RightsTRUE COLORS UNITED INC — $225,000 · Civil Rights
Environment$11,288,691Other$6,311,577Housing & Shelter$3,155,575Community Improvement$2,864,100Philanthropy$2,586,500Health$2,210,000Civil Rights$1,622,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE — $4,926,191 over 8y, 58% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $2,315,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetBUILDING CHANGES — $2,210,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetWashington Low Income Housing Alliance — $2,133,575 over 8y, 32% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $2,100,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION — $1,906,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS — $1,397,500 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND — $1,050,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetConservation Lands Foundation — $695,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetNATIONAL LOW INCOME HOUSING COALITION — $555,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetTHE WILDERNESS SOCIETY — $532,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY — $517,449 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetTRUSTEES FOR ALASKA — $472,000 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetMONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION — $375,000 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetThe Pew Charitable Trusts — $350,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC — $340,000 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetNATIVE MOVEMENT — $280,000 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetBOARDSOURCE — $226,850 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetTRUE COLORS UNITED INC — $225,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetBACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS & ANGLERS — $225,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetINDEPENDENT SECTOR — $200,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNES — $185,000 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetSITKA CONSERVATION SOCIETY — $175,000 over 7y, 3.2% of budgetCHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN — $170,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHIGH COUNTRY NEWS — $150,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE — $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCONSERVATION NW — $150,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetAMERICAN LANDS PROJECT — $140,000 over 1y, 74% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS — $135,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetNONPROFIT ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON — $130,000 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetSeattleKing County Coalition on Homelessness — $129,528 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetINVEST OUTSIDE — $125,000 over 2y, 62% of budgetSolid Ground Washington — $120,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK FOR YOUTH INC — $116,500 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL INC — $112,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTHCARE — $111,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budget501 Commons — $110,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetYouth Collaboratory Inc — $110,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS — $90,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTAXPAYERS FOR COMMON SENSE — $90,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities — $85,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WASHINGTON STATE BUDGET AND POLICY CENTER — $81,250 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetPOINT SOURCE YOUTH INC — $70,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetWASHINGTON WILD — $70,000 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetCHIEF SEATTLE CLUB — $70,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSING DEVELOPMENT CONSORTIUM OF SEATTLE - KING COUNTY — $65,250 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF SCOTCHMAN PEAKS WILDERNESS INC — $60,000 over 3y, 11% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALASKA WILDERNESS LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds BUILDING CHANGES ↗
  • Who funds Washington Low Income Housing Alliance ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds SEATTLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds Conservation Lands Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LOW INCOME HOUSING COALITION ↗
  • Who funds THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE MOCKINGBIRD SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES FOR ALASKA ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds The Pew Charitable Trusts ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO CONSERVATION LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE MOVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds BOARDSOURCE ↗
  • Who funds TRUE COLORS UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds BACKCOUNTRY HUNTERS & ANGLERS ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENT SECTOR ↗
  • Who funds FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNES ↗
  • Who funds SITKA CONSERVATION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds HIGH COUNTRY NEWS ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION NW ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LANDS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
  • Who funds NONPROFIT ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds SeattleKing County Coalition on Homelessness ↗
  • Who funds INVEST OUTSIDE ↗
  • Who funds Solid Ground Washington ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHCARE ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationRaikes FoundationWilburforce FoundationSchool's Out Washingt…PatagoniaorgGates FoundationInatai FoundationThe Satterberg Founda…The Norcliffe Foundat…The Wilderness SocietyMedina FoundationThe New-Land Foundati…
Seattle FoundationWA56.9× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Raikes Foundation · Wilburforce Foundation · School's Out Washington · Patagoniaorg · Gates Foundation · Inatai Foundation · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · The Norcliffe Foundation · The Wilderness Society · Medina Foundation · The New-Land Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Campion Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Janus Youth Programs Inc — 46% of income from government
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Campion Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Campion Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 97 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines