Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

The Liz Claiborne & Art Ortenberg Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9.5M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
81
Grants FY2024
42
Organizations funded FY2023
19%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$100,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$1,100,000
Organizations funded a year
34 to 42
FY2020 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
15
Total assets, FY2024
$230M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 19% of the organizations The Liz Claiborne & Art Ortenberg Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 9% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $905k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
EnvironmentAnimalsScience & TechArts & CultureHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving50$9.2M20%
FY202342$9.5M19%
FY202241$11M22%
FY202134$5.1M26%
FY202039$5.6Mn/a
98% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Environment$27MAnimals$12MInternational$1.4MFood & Nutrition$582kArts & Culture$506kYouth Development$165kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kPhilanthropy$64kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
DC
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 54 grantees
All grantees of The Liz Claiborne & Art Ortenberg Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Wildlife Conservation Society$7,470,92451%
Rewild$4,326,07445%
Maliasili Initiatives Inc$2,732,573516%
African Conservation Centre US$1,586,700580%
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc$1,582,11441%
Greater Yellowstone Coalition$1,350,81438%
Pams Foundation Inc$1,211,924523%
Montana Wilderness Association$745,00056%
The Peregrine Fund Inc$719,29653%
International Wilderness Leadership Foundation Inc$630,00027%
The Wilderness Society$579,50050%
Missouri Botanical Garden Board of Trustees$576,57250%
Mica Group Inc$505,000210%
Swan Valley Connections$450,000414%
Dorobo Fund for Tanzania Inc$423,800436%
Blackfoot Challenge Inc$410,00054%
Clark Fork Coalition$410,00055%
Wildlife Guardians$404,90048%
Northern Plains Resource Council$320,00054%
Health in Harmony$315,00032%
National Wildlife Federation$300,00050%
Saola Foundation Inc$284,250239%
Park County Environmental Council$230,00057%
Fauna & Flora International USA Inc$228,53928%
Climate Conservation Dba Center for Large Landscape Conservation$219,00024%
Planet Indonesia$207,500210%
Friends of Birdlife International Inc$204,40015%
Western Landowners Alliance$200,00023%
Space for Giants USA Inc$166,66718%
Yaak Valley Forest Council$155,000226%
Montana Outdoor Science School$145,000312%
Montana Natural History Center$145,00038%
Teller Wildlife Refuge Inc$130,000314%
Centre for Wildlife Studies Inc$125,150115%
Amazon Conservation Team$100,00012%
The Montana Land Reliance$100,00021%
GREAT BURN STUDY GROUP dba Great Burn Conservation Alliance$100,000131%
Friends of Scotchman Peaks Wilderness Inc$100,000218%
The Glacier-Two Medicine Alliance$100,000219%
Western Organization of Resource Councils Education Project$90,00012%
Western Organization of Resource Councils$80,07721%
CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp$67,20022%
Philanthropy New York Inc$64,35050%
World Central Kitchen Inc$50,00010%
Lincoln Park Zoological Society$50,00010%
Five Valleys Land Trust$50,00013%
The Vital Ground Foundation Inc$20,00010%
Resources Legacy Fund$10,00010%
Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc$10,00010%
Promise Project Inc$5,0001n/a
Citizens for a Better Flathead$2,50011%
Flathead Land Trust$2,50010%
International Stillbirth Alliance NFP$1,00016%
Department of Public Health & Human Services$1,0001n/a

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 21 recipients with no EIN on record ($10M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Liz Claiborne & Art Ortenberg Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 5 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 52 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $7,470,924 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetRewild: $4,326,074 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetMaliasili Initiatives Inc: $2,732,573 over 5y, 16% of budgetAfrican Conservation Centre US: $1,586,700 over 5y, 80% of budgetWildlife Conservation Network Inc: $1,582,114 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetGreater Yellowstone Coalition: $1,350,814 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetPams Foundation Inc: $1,211,924 over 5y, 23% of budgetMontana Wilderness Association: $745,000 over 5y, 6.5% of budgetThe Peregrine Fund Inc: $719,296 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetInternational Wilderness Leadership Foundation Inc: $630,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetThe Wilderness Society: $579,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMissouri Botanical Garden Board of Trustees: $576,572 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMica Group Inc: $505,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetSwan Valley Connections: $450,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetDorobo Fund for Tanzania Inc: $423,800 over 4y, 36% of budgetBlackfoot Challenge Inc: $410,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetClark Fork Coalition: $410,000 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetWildlife Guardians: $404,900 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetNorthern Plains Resource Council: $320,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetHealth in Harmony: $315,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetNational Wildlife Federation: $300,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSaola Foundation Inc: $284,250 over 2y, 39% of budgetPark County Environmental Council: $230,000 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetFauna & Flora International USA Inc: $228,539 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetClimate Conservation Dba Center for Large Landscape Conservation: $219,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetPlanet Indonesia: $207,500 over 2y, 10% of budgetFriends of Birdlife International Inc: $204,400 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetWestern Landowners Alliance: $200,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetSpace for Giants USA Inc: $166,667 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetYaak Valley Forest Council: $155,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetMontana Outdoor Science School: $145,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetMontana Natural History Center: $145,000 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetTeller Wildlife Refuge Inc: $130,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetCentre for Wildlife Studies Inc: $125,150 over 1y, 15% of budgetAmazon Conservation Team: $100,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetThe Montana Land Reliance: $100,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGREAT BURN STUDY GROUP dba Great Burn Conservation Alliance: $100,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetFriends of Scotchman Peaks Wilderness Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetThe Glacier-Two Medicine Alliance: $100,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetWestern Organization of Resource Councils Education Project: $90,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetWestern Organization of Resource Councils: $80,077 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCONSULTATIVE GROUP ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC Biodiversity Funders Grp: $67,200 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetPhilanthropy New York Inc: $64,350 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetWorld Central Kitchen Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLincoln Park Zoological Society: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFive Valleys Land Trust: $50,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetThe Vital Ground Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetResources Legacy Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 52.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The High Stakes FoundationMT36.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The High Stakes Foundation · Patagoniaorg · The Kendeda Fund · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Resources Legacy Fund · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Driggers Foundation · Mwc Foundation Inc #0726315 · Cadeau Foundation · Maki Foundation · The Fanwood Foundation · Weeden Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Liz Claiborne & Art Ortenberg Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Liz Claiborne & Art Ortenberg Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Liz Claiborne & Art Ortenberg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Liz Claiborne & Art Ortenberg Foundation

How much does The Liz Claiborne & Art Ortenberg Foundation give?
The Liz Claiborne & Art Ortenberg Foundation reported 81 grants totaling $9,530,697 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 34 and 42 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2023.
What does The Liz Claiborne & Art Ortenberg Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Environment (65%), Animals (28%), International (3%).
Who are The Liz Claiborne & Art Ortenberg Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: Wildlife Conservation Society ($7.5M), Rewild ($4.3M), Maliasili Initiatives Inc ($2.7M).
Does The Liz Claiborne & Art Ortenberg Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 19% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Liz Claiborne & Art Ortenberg Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Liz Claiborne & Art Ortenberg Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The High Stakes Foundation, Patagoniaorg, The Kendeda Fund.
Where is The Liz Claiborne & Art Ortenberg Foundation based?
The Liz Claiborne & Art Ortenberg Foundation is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Liz Claiborne & Art Ortenberg’s filings →

More from the funding graph