Loading…
Loading…
California · Nonprofit
University of California Los Angeles (California) is funded by 127 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $95,950,328 in grants to it, the largest being DR MIRIAM & SHELDON G ADELSON ($30,872,231). 67 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
University of California Los Angeles runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 6,617 education nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,617 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.
$26k from 4 funders in 2025, up from $2.4M and 13 in 2017.
From the IRS filings of University of California Los Angeles’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 127 funders by total. Association, not causation.
University of California Los Angeles has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 32% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 48% · 2018 63% · 2019 31% · 2020 40% · 2021 35% · 2022 29% · 2023 25% · 2024 26% · 2025 76% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
29% of University of California Los Angeles's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 53% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
University of California Los Angeles draws 71% of its grant income from funders outside California — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 23 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 127 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2022–2025), and the filings of 127funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing