Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Domestic Workers of America

The local's primary function includes representing members in matters related to employee-employer relations, including, but not limited to wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment and to protect and preserve the union as an institution in the performance of its legal and contractual obligations.

$2.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
50
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$329k
Largest
01What you fund
0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Employment$1.7MCivil Rights$944kHealth$730kPublic Benefit$640kEducation$582kHuman Services$557kPhilanthropy$391kArts & Culture$361kOther$0
02FY2024 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 50 grants below total $2,025,072 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,136,627 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $111,555 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $581k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+1 grant · $329k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$41M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILD CARE PROVIDERS UNITED$329,117
UDW RESOURCE CENTER$200,000
CESAR CHAVEZ SERVICE CLUB$115,000
SPONSORED BY ACTION FOR SAFETY AND$100,000
GOVERNOR NEWSOM'S BALLOT MEASURE CO$100,000
AFFORDALE COMMUNITIES SPONSORED BY$75,000
CARA$75,000
YES ON PROPOSITION 3 SPONSORED BY$75,000
ENDING MODERN DAY SLAVERY SPONSOR$75,000
BROWN PUBLISHING AND COMMUNICATIONS$55,000
CARE IN ACTION INC$52,500
PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF$51,000
SOMALI-BANTU ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA$51,000
CAIPTC$50,200
CAPITAL & MAIN$40,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $403k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOTWHEEL FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%COURAGE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE: $55k → 14%IAPALA: $25k → 14%IAPALA: $20k → 14%JORDAN'S GUARDIAN ANGELS: $35k → 12%JORDAN'S GUARDIAN ANGELS: $35k → 12%COURAGE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE: $10k → 14%US VETS: $5k → 11%JORDAN'S GUARDIAN ANGELS: $30k → 12%JORDAN'S GUARDIAN ANGELS: $20k → 12%CENTER ON POLICY INITIATIVES: $21k → 11%CENTER ON POLICY INITIATIVES: $20k → 11%CENTER ON POLICY INITIATIVES: $10k → 11%JORDAN'S GUARDIAN ANGELS: $12k → 12%CENTER ON POLICY INITIATIVES: $10k → 11%CENTER ON POLICY INITIATIVES: $10k → 11%THE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSOCIATION: $10k → 11%JACKIE ROBINSON FAMILY YMCA: $8k → 11%SOMALI-BANTU ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $51k → 11%SOMALI-BANTU ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.3M · 45 repeat orgs$3.0M to everyone else

45 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
75

Total granted

$5.3M
$1.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+54%

Still filing today

64%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureCivil RightsEducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LOS ANGELES BROTHERHOOD CRUSADE - BLACK UNITED FUND INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $255k · revenue +45%
  • UR
    UDW RESOURCE CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $250k · revenue ×13 · 39% of their budget
  • CC
    Cesar Chavez Service Clubs Inc
    4× · 2018–2024 · $174k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $500k
  • UD
    UNITED DOMESTIC WORKERS OF AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +62%
  • YO
    YES ON 16 OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL COALI
    one grant, 2020 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Labor Federation Afl-Cio

The primary purposes of the organization are the study of economic and social conditions; the pursuit of policies aimed at effecting a more equal distribution of wealth; and the promotion of full employment.

2
California State Council of Service Employees

The council coordinated the efforts of affiliated local unions and assisted their organizations work, bettering the working conditions of their members.

3
The Laborers Pacific Southwest Regional Organizing Coalition

to organize workers in the laborers international union of north America, afl-cio pacific southwest region through a coordinated program to maintain and improve employment opportunities for affiliated local union members and to recruit new…

Employment
4
California Employers Association

Provide all member employers with current human resource and California labor law information.

5
Contra Costa Labor Council Afl-Cio

The council is a federation of approximately 85 affiliated unions. the organizaton engages in a wide range of activities. the activities are designed to improve the lives of working families, to bring economic justice to the workplace, and…

6
League of Women Voters of Los Angeles

The League of Women Voters, a nonpartisan political organization, encourages informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and…

7
California Workforce Association

To promote, enhance and serve the interests of local workforce development partnerships.

8
Los Angelesorange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council

To organize, increase collective bargaining support and publicize labor issues related to the construction industry within los angeles and orange counties.

9
California Chamber of Commerce

Represent members and cal employers to members of cal legislature and other agencies of state government through in-house legislative analysts, lobbying staff, and contract lobbyists. cal chamber publishes books and software related to…

10
Coalition for Responsible and Equitable Economic Development Los Angeles

To ensure that the workers in the construction industry in Los Angeles are highly trained and professional. The organization seeks the creation of good jobs, safety for workers, health care and a secure retirement for working families.

Community Improvement
11
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
12
Los Angeles Black Worker Center

The mission of the Los Angeles Black Worker Center is to increase access to quality jobs, reduce employment discrimination, and improve industries that employ black workers through action and unionization.

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southern California Center for Nonprofit Management and the most unlike its peers is United States Veterans Initiative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%7%<5yr16%14%5–10yr20%29%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr11%10%35–55yr13%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%10%<5yr16%33%5–10yr20%29%10–20yr17%8%20–35yr11%2%35–55yr13%19%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%2/68
the rest of the field
15%
15,572/104,700

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

60 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 60 of the 145 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
17
Early backer (in before they grew)
58/60
Grantees still filing
38/60
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CAIPTC — $965,100 · OtherCAIPTCIndividual grant recipient — $500,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHILD CARE PROVIDERS UNITED — $329,117 · OtherCHILD CARE PROVIDERS UNITEDCARA — $217,900 · OtherSAN DIEGO & IMPERIAL COUNTIES LABOR — $195,000 · Other+107 more — $3,240,547 · Other+107 moreThe B5 Foundation — $937,940 · EmploymentThe B5 Founda…+1 more — $20,000 · EmploymentCalifornia Independent Provider Training Center — $351,400 · EducationCaliforni…UDW RESOURCE CENTER — $250,000 · EducationUDW RESOU…Women in California Leadership Inc — $65,000 · EducationWomen in …CALIFORNIA LGBTQ FOUNDATION — $35,000 · Education+1 more — $8,000 · EducationJORDANS GUARDIAN ANGELS — $132,000 · Human ServicesCENTER ON POLICY INITIATIVES — $71,000 · Human ServicesCOURAGE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE C3 — $65,000 · Human ServicesSomali Bantu Association of America — $57,000 · Human ServicesINSTITUTE FOR ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LEADERSHIP AND ADVANCEMENT — $45,000 · Human Services+4 more — $32,650 · Human ServicesCAPITAL & MAIN — $155,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MIGUEL CONTRERAS FOUNDATION — $40,000 · Arts & CultureMANDATE PROJECT IMPACT INC — $35,000 · Arts & CultureASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION — $27,500 · Arts & CultureVOICE OF SAN DIEGO — $10,000 · Arts & CultureLATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $7,500 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES BROTHERHOOD CRUSADE - BLACK UNITED FUND INC — $255,000 · PhilanthropySOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS — $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $8,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE — $115,000 · Civil RightsCare in Action Inc — $52,500 · Civil RightsCARA EDUCATION FUND — $35,000 · Civil RightsEQUALITY CALIFORNIA — $22,000 · Civil RightsNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc — $20,000 · Civil RightsA PHILIP RANDOLPH EDUCATIONAL FUND — $10,000 · Civil Rights+1 more — $6,000 · Civil Rights
Other$5,447,664Employment$957,940Education$709,400Human Services$402,650Arts & Culture$285,000Philanthropy$273,000Civil Rights$260,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe B5 Foundation — $937,940 over 5y, 91% of budgetCalifornia Independent Provider Training Center — $351,400 over 3y, 58% of budgetLOS ANGELES BROTHERHOOD CRUSADE - BLACK UNITED FUND INC — $255,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetUDW RESOURCE CENTER — $250,000 over 2y, 39% of budgetCesar Chavez Service Clubs Inc — $173,873 over 4y, 12% of budgetCAPITAL & MAIN — $155,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetUNITED DOMESTIC WORKERS OF AMERICA — $150,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOURAGE CALIFORNIA — $140,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetJORDANS GUARDIAN ANGELS — $132,000 over 5y, 6.5% of budgetTHE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE — $115,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetCENTER ON POLICY INITIATIVES — $71,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetCOURAGE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE C3 — $65,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetSan Diego and Imperial Counties Labor Council AFL-CIO — $65,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetWomen in California Leadership Inc — $65,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL COAST LABOR COUNCIL — $59,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetSomali Bantu Association of America — $57,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY — $55,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCare in Action Inc — $52,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLA JAZZ FESTIVAL FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LEADERSHIP AND ADVANCEMENT — $45,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetAFSCME FALLEN HEROES FUND — $44,000 over 2y, 57% of budgetTHE MIGUEL CONTRERAS FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAFLCIO Los Angeles County Federation of Labor Building Assoc — $36,100 over 2y, 32% of budgetCALIFORNIA LGBTQ FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetMANDATE PROJECT IMPACT INC — $35,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetCARA EDUCATION FUND — $35,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION — $27,500 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetEQUALITY CALIFORNIA — $22,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetORANGE COUNTY LABOR FEDERATION AFL-CIO — $20,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetJOHN STACY LYONS MEMORIAL FNDTN — $20,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetPROGRESSIVE LABOR ALLIANCE — $20,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES COUNTY FEDERATION OF LABOR AFL-CIO — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetA PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE — $12,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN LABOR ALLIANCE AFL -CIO — $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetVOICE OF SAN DIEGO — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetA PHILIP RANDOLPH EDUCATIONAL FUND — $10,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetLATINO LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCalifornia Research Project — $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetHotwheel Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetMAINE PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSan Francisco Labor Council — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ASSN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The B5 Foundation
  • Who funds California Independent Provider Training Center
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES BROTHERHOOD CRUSADE - BLACK UNITED FUND INC
  • Who funds UDW RESOURCE CENTER
  • Who funds Cesar Chavez Service Clubs Inc
  • Who funds CAPITAL & MAIN
  • Who funds UNITED DOMESTIC WORKERS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds COURAGE CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds JORDANS GUARDIAN ANGELS
  • Who funds THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE
  • Who funds CENTER ON POLICY INITIATIVES
  • Who funds COURAGE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE C3
  • Who funds San Diego and Imperial Counties Labor Council AFL-CIO
  • Who funds Women in California Leadership Inc
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS
  • Who funds CENTRAL COAST LABOR COUNCIL
  • Who funds Somali Bantu Association of America
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY
  • Who funds Care in Action Inc
  • Who funds LA JAZZ FESTIVAL FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seiu Local 2015CA28.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seiu Local 2015 · The California Endowment · The San Diego Foundation · Communications Workers of America Afl-Cio Clc · The James Irvine Foundation · American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees · California Community Foundation · California Nurses Association · Seiu Local 221 · Unite Here · American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations · The Conrad Prebys Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Domestic Workers of America funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to United Domestic Workers of America?

    Find your warmest path to United Domestic Workers of America through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 145 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph