· Public charity
Pi Beta Phi Foundation
PI BETA PHI FOUNDATION enables the fraternity to realize its vision and ensures the future of our sisterhood.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 24 grants below total $3,313,244 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,770,738 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $457,494 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $61k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $154k
- $250k+4 grants · $3.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OK BETA OF PI BETA PHI HOUSING CORP | $1,210,315 |
| MISSOURI ALPHA CHAPTER OF PI BETA PHI | $1,083,449 |
| TEXAS ETA CHAPTER OF PI BETA PHI CORPORATION | $406,548 |
| PI BETA PHI FRATERNITY | $397,741 |
| AR ALPHA HOUSING CORP | $27,000 |
| THE LEAP FROG PROGRAM | $21,850 |
| TUSCALOOSA EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI | $16,000 |
| MN ALPHA CHAPTER OF PI BETA PHI | $15,269 |
| UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA | $11,950 |
| INDIANA UNIVERSITY - BLOOMINGTON | $11,500 |
| OKLAHOMA ALPHA CHAPTER OF PI BETA PHI | $10,704 |
| IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY | $8,900 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PBPI BETA PHI FRATERNITY8× · 2017–2025 · $5.3M · revenue +27%
- PBPI BETA PHI FRATERNITY OKLAHOMA BETA CHAPTER2× · 2024–2025 · $3.8M · revenue +62%
- PBPI BETA PHI ARKANSAS ALPHA HOUSE CORPORATION6× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +34% · 82% of their budget
Funded once
- PBPI BETA PHI FRATERNITY MISSISSIPPI BETA CHAPTERone grant, 2024 · $359k · revenue +19%
- TFTPL FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue -34%
- TFTUCSON FESTIVAL OF BOOKSgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $16k · revenue +88%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To mutually encourage and assist members in social, mental, and moral advancement.
Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.
Brotherhood, Scholarship,Leadership
Provide housing for undergraduate chapter of a national collegiate social sorority.
Provide a suitable social environment for collegiate members.
Provide housing for college students at kansas state university.
The organization is an association of men of integrity who strive to develop the individual in his intellect, in his involvement in the community, and in his faith.
Provide fraternal services - room & board and social activities for members
To provide housing, meals, and a meeting place for social activities of college age women, members of gamma iota chapter of alpha delta pi sorority.
To provide comfortable living space which promotes both academic and social growth to a group of about 40 undergraduate students of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Provide for our members a safe, quality living environment that promotes academic excellence and individual and chapter success. We are committed to fiscal responsibility, operating with integrity , honoring tradition and demonstrating…
To promote academic and social brotherhood among members by providing and maintaining the fraternity house where members live while enrollled at the pennsylvania state university.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pi Beta Phi Fraternity Missouri Alpha Chapter and the most unlike its peers is Umom New Day Centers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 57 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PI BETA PHI FRATERNITY ↗
- Who funds PI BETA PHI FRATERNITY OKLAHOMA BETA CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds PI BETA PHI ARKANSAS ALPHA HOUSE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PI BETA PHI FRATERNITY MISSOURI ALPHA CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds KANSAS BETA OF PI BETA PHI HOUSE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds PI BETA PHI FRATERNITY TEXAS EPSILON CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds PI BETA PHI FRATERNITY MISSISSIPPI BETA CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds PI BETA PHI FRATERNITY ARIZONA ALPHA CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA BETA OF PI BETA PHI INC ↗
- Who funds Boys Club of Brazos County Inc ↗
- Who funds Pi Beta Phi Corp of Lubbock co Michelle Stephens ↗
- Who funds INDIANA DELTA OF PI BETA PHI INC ↗
- Who funds TUSCALOOSA CITY SCHOOLS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PI BETA PHI OREGON ALPHA HOUSE ↗
- Who funds LAFAYETTE COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA ALPHA OF PI BETA PHI ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE LEAP FROG PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds TPL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HATTIESBURG PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATE FAIRFAX ↗
- Who funds PI BETA PHI FRATERNITY OKLAHOMA ALPHA CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds TUCSON FESTIVAL OF BOOKS ↗
- Who funds Drury University ↗
- Who funds KIDS NEED TO READ ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN BETA OF PI BETA PHI ASSN INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds READING CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOOK TRUCK INC ↗
- Who funds REACH OUT AND READ INC ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dollar General Literacy Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pi Beta Phi Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Community Action Program Inc — 62% of income from government
- Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
- Stetson University Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Pi Beta Phi Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Pi Beta Phi Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.