Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Hispanic Scholarship Fund

Hsf empowers students and parents with the knowledge and resources to successfully complete a higher education, while providing support services and scholarships to as many exceptional students, hsf scholars and alumni as possible.

$32M
Granted FY2025still arriving
278
Grants FY2025still arriving
47
States reached
$903k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$88MCivil Rights$131k
02FY2025 · 278 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 278 grants below total $22,314,149 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $32,453,331 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,139,182 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k33 grants · $247k
  • $10k–50k146 grants · $3.5M
  • $50k–250k78 grants · $7.9M
  • $250k+21 grants · $11M
$30,806
Median grant
47
States reached
$123M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOWARD UNIVERSITY$902,564
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN$774,943
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE$720,573
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$720,093
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES$710,641
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD UNIVERSITY$693,565
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK$667,921
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$602,881
SPELMAN COLLEGE$574,436
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$453,873
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE$437,314
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$424,459
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY$414,504
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$387,853
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN - ANN ARBOR$366,636
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 80% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $1.0M → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE: $437k → 10%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $424k → 10%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $287k → 16%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $775k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA: $266k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN - ANN ARBOR: $367k → 14%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $303k → 11%SPELMAN COLLEGE: $574k → 8%GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $454k → 13%TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $415k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $312k → 22%THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $826k → 8%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $504k → 10%SPELMAN COLLEGE: $399k → 8%GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $291k → 13%THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $694k → 8%THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN: $244k → 10%THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $670k → 8%THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $662k → 8%THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $423k → 8%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $388k → 14%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE: $721k → 8%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $256k → 14%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE: $578k → 8%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $603k → 17%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $251k → 14%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE: $523k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $720k → 14%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $446k → 17%PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE: $481k → 8%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $711k → 14%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $262k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $449k → 14%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $499k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $347k → 14%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $300k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $301k → 14%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $247k → 14%UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND: $21.2M → 14%HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $903k → 14%THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $699k → 17%HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $452k → 14%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $685k → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $668k → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $590k → 17%THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $428k → 17%THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $381k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$47M · 211 repeat orgs$23M to everyone else

211 repeat relationships — 188 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 67 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

211
17

Total granted

$47M
$21M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+42%

Still filing today

53%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    New York University
    7× · 2019–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +51%
  • THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +38%
  • Northwestern University
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $21M · revenue +74%
  • DV
    DELAWARE VALLEY UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +5%
  • CS
    COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $19k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
3
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
4
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
5
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
6
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
7
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
10
Hillsdale College

Hillsdale college is a private liberal arts college with approximately 1,500 students. founded in 1844, the college remains, in the words of its articles of association, "grateful to god for the inestimable blessings resulting from the…

Education
11
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
12
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University and the most unlike its peers is Amda Inc (American Musical and Dramatic Academy). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Health Access Advocacy and …Community Arts CentersChristian Missionary Organi…Immigrant Worker SupportCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 80 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr16%5%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr16%78%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%38%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr16%48%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/307
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,258

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

166 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 166 of the 307 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
166/166
Grantees still filing
113/166
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $21,206,244 · EducationUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INCTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $4,441,592 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITYTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $3,586,337 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORKPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $3,095,865 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $2,379,531 · EducationNew York University — $2,099,627 · Education+101 more — $23,778,014 · Education+101 moreUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS — $2,136,283 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXASREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $2,036,823 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIAGEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $1,574,256 · OtherGEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOG…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY — $1,326,157 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF C…UNVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA — $1,062,526 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $1,022,051 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $793,022 · Other+83 more — $13,270,176 · Other+83 moreNorthwestern University — $1,289,953 · Recreation & SportsBROWN UNIVERSITY — $1,168,203 · Community ImprovementLATINO DONOR COLLABORATIVE INC — $131,113 · Arts & Culture
Education$60,587,210Other$23,221,294Recreation & Sports$1,289,953Community Improvement$1,168,203Arts & Culture$131,113

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $21,206,244 over 1y, 23% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $4,441,592 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $3,586,337 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $3,095,865 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $2,379,531 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University — $2,099,627 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYale University — $1,707,362 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $1,685,447 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University — $1,289,953 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $1,168,203 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $1,126,142 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSpelman College — $1,063,460 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $1,022,051 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $946,674 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University — $828,316 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $805,419 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $761,807 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University — $559,618 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWilliam Marsh Rice University — $546,151 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University — $530,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDavidson College — $527,605 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY — $425,153 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University — $424,813 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $414,728 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University — $405,507 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College — $348,040 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Tulsa — $341,768 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $335,033 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $328,283 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC — $322,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $321,547 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMOREHOUSE COLLEGE — $311,178 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSavannah College of Art and DesignInc — $300,912 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $291,513 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University — $284,862 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPACE UNIVERSITY — $281,973 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $279,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $268,455 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEMERSON COLLEGE — $267,823 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $262,882 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $256,792 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University — $252,387 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $218,942 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $208,497 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPOMONA COLLEGE — $200,159 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND — $193,344 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $178,599 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University — $168,036 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds New York University
  • Who funds Yale University
  • Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Northwestern University
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Spelman College
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds Cornell University
  • Who funds University of Chicago
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Emory University
  • Who funds William Marsh Rice University
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University
  • Who funds Davidson College
  • Who funds PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College
  • Who funds The University of Tulsa

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Collegiate Athletic AssociationIN109.8× affinity55 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · Folds of Honor Foundation · American Chemical Society · Tulsa Community Foundation · American Council of Learned Societies · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · World Learning Inc · National Writing Project Corporation · Howard Hughes Medical Institute · Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities · Corporation for Public Broadcasting · Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Hispanic Scholarship Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology26% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology12% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College11% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University11% of income from government
  • Yale University9% of income from government
  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute6% of income from government
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College5% of income from government
  • Northeastern University4% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa2% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College2% of income from government
  • Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc2% of income from government
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc2% of income from government
  • University of Portland2% of income from government
  • Southeastern University Inc1% of income from government
  • Rider University1% of income from government
  • Wellesley College1% of income from government
  • Suffolk University1% of income from government
  • Mcphs University1% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College0% of income from government
  • Rollins College0% of income from government
  • Champlain College Incorporated0% of income from government
  • Emerson College0% of income from government
  • Boston Architectural College0% of income from government
  • Berklee College of Music Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 307 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph