Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

California · Nonprofit

PREVENT CHILD ABUSE CALIFORNIA

PREVENT CHILD ABUSE CALIFORNIA (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,967,487 to it, the largest being SIERRA HEALTH FOUNDATION CENTER FOR HEALTH PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ($1,067,625). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$3.9M
Revenue FY2024
7
Funders on record
$2.0M
Grants received
$-1591630
Net assets
4/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 9%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($4.7M) Expenses 100 ($4.7M)2018 Revenue 90 ($4.2M) Expenses 96 ($4.5M)2019 Revenue 100 ($4.7M) Expenses 101 ($4.7M)2020 Revenue 155 ($7.3M) Expenses 160 ($7.6M)2021 Revenue 218 ($10M) Expenses 208 ($9.8M)2022 Revenue 202 ($9.5M) Expenses 226 ($11M)2023 Revenue 96 ($4.5M) Expenses 98 ($4.6M)2024 Revenue 82 ($3.9M) Expenses 84 ($4.0M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (82)Expenses (84)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 95% · 2018 94% · 2019 89% · 2020 96% · 2021 92% · 2022 100% · 2023 95% · 2024 98%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$9k
17
$256k
18
$17k
19
$227k
20
$491k
21
$1.1M
22
$78k
23
$73k
24
0.1
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income fell $75k → $20k.

1 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PREVENT CHILD ABUSE CALIFORNIA’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PREVENT CHILD ABUSE CALIFORNIA leans on a few funders — its largest provides 54% of grant income and the top three 89%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

55% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PREVENT CHILD ABUSE CALIFORNIA.

54%
largest funder
89%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 62% · 2020 60% · 2021 63% · 2022 83% · 2023 99%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

97% of PREVENT CHILD ABUSE CALIFORNIA's grant income comes from California funders.

NY
CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $862 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding PREVENT CHILD ABUSE CALIFORNIA receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $120k on record.

Federal$120k
grants $120kcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
Top agencies
  • Corporation for National and Community Service$120k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like PREVENT CHILD ABUSE CALIFORNIA

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

90% of spending goes to programs.

Program 90%Management 10%Fundraising 0%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Part of a family of 3 related entities

  • Child Abuse Prevention Council of S · exempt
  • Lift the Children · exempt
  • Child Abuse Prevention Center PAC · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PREVENT CHILD ABUSE CALIFORNIA: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PREVENT CHILD ABUSE CALIFORNIA?
PREVENT CHILD ABUSE CALIFORNIA (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,967,487 to it, the largest being SIERRA HEALTH FOUNDATION CENTER FOR HEALTH PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ($1,067,625). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PREVENT CHILD ABUSE CALIFORNIA have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $1,967,487 in grants to PREVENT CHILD ABUSE CALIFORNIA, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PREVENT CHILD ABUSE CALIFORNIA?
SIERRA HEALTH FOUNDATION CENTER FOR HEALTH PROGRAM MANAGEMENT is the largest funder on record, with $1,067,625 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PREVENT CHILD ABUSE CALIFORNIA find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing