Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Webb Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$111k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$560kHealth$321kHuman Services$124kArts & Culture$62kEducation$26kYouth Development$2kPhilanthropy$1kHousing & Shelter$850Other$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$8,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$833k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$50,750
presbyterian church$24,000
The Priority Center$20,850
A21 USA INC$8,000
GRACE CHURCH$5,000
POWER TO ACT$2,000
CHOC FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%The Obria Group: $4k → 19%A21 USA INC: $8k → 11%The Obria Group: $4k → 19%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $6k → 14%The Obria Group: $4k → 19%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $6k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $6k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $3k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $2k → 14%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
OH
PA
CA
CO
WV
VA
MD
NC
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.1M · 22 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against -20% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
15

Total granted

$1.1M
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
-20%

Still filing today

36%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionInternationalHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
    3× · 2018–2022 · $146k · revenue +32%
  • TP
    THE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $79k · revenue +11%
  • FR
    FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL
    6× · 2017–2024 · $25k · revenue +63%

Funded once

  • AA
    ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • BW
    baf-woodrow wilson class of 1952 fu
    one grant, 2019 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Emanate Health Foothill Presbyterian Hospital

Our mission is to help people keep well in body, mind, and spirit by providing quality health care services in a safe, compassionate environment.

Health
2
Emanate Health

Our mission is to help people keep well in body, mind, and spirit by providing quality health care services in a safe, compassionate environment.

Health
3
Emanate Health Medical Center

Our mission is to help people keep well in body, mind, and spirit by providing quality health care services in a safe, compassionate environment.

Health
4
Emanate Health Hospice

Our mission is to help people keep well in body, mind, and spirit by providing quality health care services in a safe, compassionate environment.

Human Services
5
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
6
Children's Healthcare of California

The primary exempt purpose of children's healthcare of california includes without limitation the receipt of distributions and grants for the making of distributions and grants to children's hospital of orange county (choc) and to…

Health
7
Allyfe Pregnancy Clinics

Allyfe pregnancy clinic exists to offer truth, hope, and love to every woman and family facing an unexpected pregnancy. founded in 1985, we have built four decades of integrity as a christ-centered center of excellence - providing…

Human Services
8
Providence Trinitycare Hospice

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

9
Children's Hospital of Orange County

To nurture, advance and protect the health and well-being of children.

Health
10
Loma Linda University Shared Services Inc

To participate in christ's ministry of health, healing, and wholeness for: education, healthcare, and research by providing support to the lluh entities.

11
Providence Medical Foundation

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

Health
12
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Hospital Regional Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is Pathway to Hope Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
8/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

presbyterian church — $430,100 · Otherpresbyterian churchIndividual grant recipient — $110,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientalzheimers disease research — $100,500 · Otheralzheimers disease researchProvidence Mission Hope — $100,000 · OtherProvidence Mission HopeOCHSA FOUNDATION — $62,000 · OtherOCHSA FOUNDATIONALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION — $50,000 · OtherALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION+25 more — $83,417 · Other+25 moreMISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER — $146,000 · HealthMISSION HOSPI…+1 more — $500 · HealthTHE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE — $78,873 · Crime & LegalFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL — $24,996 · Human ServicesTHE OBRIA GROUP INC — $12,000 · Human ServicesA21 USA INC — $8,000 · Human ServicesUCLA FOUNDATION — $3,000 · EducationTILLY'S LIFE CENTER — $1,100 · EducationE3 Partners Ministry — $3,000 · Religion+1 more — $100 · ReligionSADDLEBACK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $1,000 · PhilanthropyBECKLEY AREA FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$936,767Health$146,500Crime & Legal$78,873Human Services$44,996Education$4,100Religion$3,100Philanthropy$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER — $146,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE — $78,873 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL — $24,996 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OBRIA GROUP INC — $12,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetA21 USA INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetE3 Partners Ministry — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTILLY'S LIFE CENTER — $1,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSADDLEBACK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBECKLEY AREA FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOrange County Rescue Mission Inc — $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ALAMITOS POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION — $200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENCHANTED PEACH CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSION HOSPITAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds THE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE
  • Who funds FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL
  • Who funds THE OBRIA GROUP INC
  • Who funds A21 USA INC
  • Who funds E3 Partners Ministry
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TILLY'S LIFE CENTER
  • Who funds SADDLEBACK MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BECKLEY AREA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds FresnoMadera Youth For Christ Inc
  • Who funds CHOC FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Orange County Rescue Mission Inc
  • Who funds LOS ALAMITOS POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY
  • Who funds ENCHANTED PEACH CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Webb Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Webb Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Webb Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph